table of contents

09/17/2005

René Girard: Why We Want What We Want

“MIMETIC DESIRE IS AN ABSOLUTE MONARCH.” –RENÉ GIRARD“Know thyself.” It’s not an easy proposition. As Entitled Opinions host Robert Harrison says, “To know yourself means, above all, to know your desire. Desires are what lurk at the heart of our behavior. It’s what determines our motivations. It’s what organizes our social relations. It’s what informs our politics, […]

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[Music]
00:00:10.000
This is KZSU, Stanford.
00:00:14.000
Welcome to entitled opinions. My name is Robert Harrison
00:00:20.000
and we're coming to you live from the Stanford campus.
00:00:24.000
[Music]
00:00:50.000
And pitious to tears. But tell me in the time of your sweet size, how did love grant you to know your dangerous desires?
00:01:00.000
And she to me, we were reading one day for pleasure of Lancelot, how loved we set him.
00:01:08.000
We were alone and without any suspicion. Many times that reading drove our eyes together and turned our faces pale,
00:01:16.000
but one point alone was the one that overpowered us.
00:01:20.000
When we read that the yearn for smile was kissed by so great a lover,
00:01:25.000
he who will never be separated from me,
00:01:29.000
kissed my mouth all trembling.
00:01:32.000
Galerto was the book and he who wrote it.
00:01:36.000
That day we read no further.
00:01:39.000
[Music]
00:01:49.000
[Music]
00:02:09.000
I was reading from Kanto 5 of Dante's Inferno, the famous Salulik we of Francesca in the circle of lust.
00:02:16.000
How did love grant you to know your dangerous desires?
00:02:21.000
That's the question, how do no one's desire.
00:02:25.000
We think of the university as an institution devoted to the pursuit of knowledge and so it is.
00:02:31.000
If that's not all it is, the sciences seek after knowledge,
00:02:36.000
but in the humanities we're interested above all in self knowledge, which is a very different kind of beast.
00:02:43.000
The founding adage of philosophy is "know thyself."
00:02:47.000
That's not an easy proposition.
00:02:51.000
To know yourself means above all to know your desire.
00:02:55.000
Desire is what lurks at the heart of our behavior.
00:02:58.000
It's what determines our motivations.
00:03:01.000
It's what organizes our social relations.
00:03:04.000
It's what informs our politics, religions, ideologies, and above all our conflicts.
00:03:10.000
And yet nothing is more mysterious, elusive, or perverse than human desire.
00:03:16.000
It's amazing to me that our government invests so many billions of dollars in scientific research every year
00:03:22.000
in order to better understand the world of nature.
00:03:26.000
Yet commits only a tiny fraction of that to advancing the cause of self knowledge
00:03:31.000
in order to better understand ourselves.
00:03:34.000
Most of our major problems today are as old as the world itself.
00:03:39.000
The problem of reciprocal violence, for example, which seems to draw us all into its vortex.
00:03:46.000
You would think we would want to understand its mechanisms, its psychology, its tendencies to spiral out of control.
00:03:55.000
Instead, we keep on reacting and blindly perpetuating its cycles,
00:04:00.000
the way our ancestors have done for centuries and even millennia.
00:04:05.000
We're not very good when it comes to understanding the basic laws and passions of human nature.
00:04:10.000
Almost as if we were afraid to ask about the deeper, desired, driven sources of our conduct.
00:04:17.000
Almost as if we were afraid to ask about ourselves as individuals and as a society, and so far as we are desiring creatures.
00:04:28.000
I have a guest with me in the studio who has spent the greater part of his career trying to understand the fundamental mechanisms of human desire
00:04:36.000
and will be talking to him during the next hour about his theories.
00:04:40.000
His name is Honejiraj and it's a distinct privilege and honor to have him on this program.
00:04:46.000
Honej, welcome.
00:04:48.000
Welcome to pleasure to be here.
00:04:50.000
Professor Honejiraj is one of the titans of 20th century thought,
00:04:54.000
and I for one believe that the 21st century will vindicate the cogency of his theories in a clamorous way.
00:05:01.000
He has published several momentous and ground-baked breaking books,
00:05:05.000
and just this year, his native country of France saw fit to recognize his extraordinary achievements
00:05:11.000
by inducting him into the Akadimifal says,
00:05:15.000
which is the highest honor of French intellectual can receive in France.
00:05:19.000
His induction ceremony will be taking place on December 15th.
00:05:23.000
Honej, congratulations on becoming one of the so-called immortals of the French Academy.
00:05:28.000
Thank you very much.
00:05:30.000
I should also mention that Honej has been a professor of French literature here at Stanford since the late 70s
00:05:36.000
in the Department of French and Italian, and that means that Stanford's Department of French and Italian
00:05:42.000
has not only won, but two immortals among its faculty.
00:05:47.000
Honejiraj and Michel Seir.
00:05:50.000
For those of you who may not appreciate how exceptional that is,
00:05:53.000
let me say that no other department in the country has even won.
00:05:58.000
Honej, your work as an enormous reach, it branches out into various areas and disciplines, literary criticism, anthropology,
00:06:07.000
religious studies, and so forth.
00:06:09.000
But today we'd like to focus on what I take to be the foundational concept of all you're thinking, namely, memetic desire.
00:06:17.000
Can you tell our listeners exactly what you mean by that term, memetic desire?
00:06:22.000
The memetic desire is fundamentally a desire in which the choice of the object the individual is going to desire is not determined by that object itself,
00:06:36.000
as we normally believe, but by third person, we imitate a third person, and this is what memetic means.
00:06:46.000
In order to understand this, you can take almost any example.
00:06:52.000
Why do all girls have been burying their navels for the last five years?
00:06:58.000
Obviously they didn't all think by themselves that it would be nice to show one's navel.
00:07:04.000
Or maybe one is too hot in the navel, and one must do something about this.
00:07:10.000
We see the memetic nature of that desire, the data, fashion collapses.
00:07:16.000
Suddenly it will become very old fashion to show one's navel, and no one will show it anymore.
00:07:21.000
And it will be because of other people, just as now, it is because of other people that they show it.
00:07:33.000
But how far do you want to go in and saying that desire by its very nature and human beings is fundamentally memetic?
00:07:42.000
Well, maybe one can start from this question.
00:07:46.000
What is the difference between need, appetite and desire?
00:07:51.000
And need and appetite all animals have, and we know very well that if we are alone in a Sahara desert,
00:08:01.000
and we are thirsty, we don't need a model to want to drink.
00:08:06.000
It's a need that we have to satisfy.
00:08:09.000
But most about desires in a civilized society are not like that.
00:08:14.000
And if you think of such thing as vanity, snobbery, you know, what is snobbery?
00:08:20.000
In snobbery you desire something not because you really had an appetite for it,
00:08:25.000
but because you think you look smarter, you look more fashionable if you imitate the man who desires that object,
00:08:36.000
or also pretend that he desires it.
00:08:40.000
Well, let me read one quote, a few lines from one of your essays from the Volume Double Business Bound,
00:08:48.000
where you say that mimetic desire precedes the appearance of its object and survives the disappearance of its object.
00:08:54.000
My mises cannot spread without becoming reciprocal.
00:08:59.000
And here the important line for me, desire is attract, ape and bind one another,
00:09:07.000
creating antagonistic relationships that both parties seek to define in terms of difference.
00:09:13.000
So here's the question.
00:09:15.000
The young women who are bearing their navels,
00:09:18.000
there doesn't seem to be necessarily an element of antagonism in this kind of massive mimetic imitation of the others.
00:09:27.000
And it's very important, I think in your theory, to the you hold to the fact that antagonism is almost the inevitable result of mimetic desire when it becomes rivalrous.
00:09:40.000
Well, maybe the best example would be this first place of Shakespeare in which you always have two male friends, you know.
00:09:49.000
And they always desire the same thing. They've lived together, they desire the same dreams, the same meals,
00:09:56.000
and they even see to each other, if you don't want what I want, you're not my friend.
00:10:02.000
But suddenly one of them falls in love with a girl. And as soon as the other one falls in love with a girl, the same girl, because of his friend,
00:10:13.000
antagonism is going to proceed. They are two types of objects.
00:10:17.000
The objects we can share because they are abundant, you know, drinks, soft drinks, and so forth.
00:10:23.000
And they are the objects we cannot share or do not want to share, which is the case for the, you know, sympathy, the love of a girl friend.
00:10:35.000
We do not want to share that, even especially with our best friend. Even though these characters are very insecure, and as soon as they desire a girl, they are trying to get their friend to desire the same girl.
00:10:51.000
This is a crucial point, because it's one thing to have competition over the scarcity of the object.
00:10:59.000
One woman, one man can have her or the other. But I take it to be suggesting that it's much more complex than that.
00:11:06.000
Which more complex.
00:11:07.000
That it's not just that two men desiring the same object, but it's somehow their desire is, for Miss Goose, one with the other, and their rivalry sets up a kind of desire for the rival, no?
00:11:19.000
Yes. It's very obvious, for instance, in the two gentlemen, Verona, you know, where as soon as one of the two boys is in love with a girl, his friend is inevitably drawn into the game.
00:11:34.000
Why is that?
00:11:35.000
And in a way, the first friend tries to draw the other one into the game, because if his friend does not love his girlfriend, he's not sure he made the right choice.
00:11:45.000
Therefore, he too is mediated.
00:11:48.000
And this type of friendship is something that obsesses Shakespeare and other writers.
00:11:56.000
Well, here is the kind of path I'd like to follow first, which is given a number of examples from Shakespeare.
00:12:07.000
I began at the top of the hour, I read from Francesca speech in Kanto 5, where the two lovers are reading a book in which two lovers kiss each other, and they let the book slip on and they imitate the lovers.
00:12:23.000
The first question is, what role does literature play for you in your thinking, in terms of revealing the structures and mechanisms of literature?
00:12:34.000
Literature is just like another other.
00:12:37.000
In other words, if you imitate a book, in the case of Lancelot, you have the Queen and the Queen Queen Vere, and she falls in love with Lancelot.
00:12:50.000
And Paolo and Francesca, they are in-laws, you know, Francesca is married to the brother of Paolo.
00:12:58.000
They have absolutely no bad idea of making love to each other, no bad thought.
00:13:04.000
But when they read this, they think about themselves. They think they could do the same thing.
00:13:10.000
And they are suddenly inspired by the book to do the same thing.
00:13:15.000
That's why Dante, obviously, views the book as in a way that devil who incites that gallo to fool liberal, a kilos crease.
00:13:26.000
The book was their gallo to.
00:13:30.000
The gallo to tell our listeners gallo is the traitor.
00:13:33.000
He's the traitor between the Queen and her boyfriend.
00:13:39.000
She is the one who suggested to the boyfriend that he should make love.
00:13:43.000
He's a go-between.
00:13:45.000
The theme of the go-between is extremely important in Shakespeare too, pandoras, you know.
00:13:51.000
So the go-between is in a way a man who plays with the mimelectessai of others.
00:13:58.000
And the man of the theater, he sets up some kind of story by inciting the méric desire
00:14:05.000
and watching the results, which are usually drama.
00:14:09.000
Drama of jealousy of envy of conflict.
00:14:14.000
So Galleo, there was a traitor to the king.
00:14:17.000
Yes.
00:14:18.000
And a go-between between the adulterous lovers, Paolo and Francesca are cousins, or they're
00:14:24.000
their brother and sister-in-law.
00:14:27.000
And there's a pure emulation of behavior.
00:14:31.000
So here, I guess the question I would ask is if literature first led you to see the structure of mimetic desires,
00:14:41.000
I believe in your first book to seek desire in the novel, is when you first laid out this theater.
00:14:46.000
And all this was through a massive probing of European fiction, beginning with Cervantes and going all the way up to Camus and so forth.
00:14:55.000
So literature clearly had a revelatory fun.
00:14:59.000
Yes, but it was more the contact between literature and my own experience, you know.
00:15:04.000
I was in my early 20s then.
00:15:09.000
And of course I was interested in girlfriends.
00:15:13.000
And I suddenly realized that I was just like the most novel heroes, like post, you know, in his novel.
00:15:22.000
One girlfriend, she wanted me to marry her.
00:15:27.000
And I didn't want to do that.
00:15:29.000
And therefore I would move away from her when she demanded, in a way, some commitment on my part.
00:15:37.000
But as soon as I had moved away and she had accepted it and she had left me, I was drawn back to her again by the very fact, in a way, she denied herself to me.
00:15:49.000
And I realized suddenly there that she was both object and mediator for me, some kind of novel.
00:15:58.000
You see, and she influenced my desire by denying it.
00:16:03.000
So all these games, these negative games, which are always fair in desire, because even the people who know least about desire are aware that the denial of the object increases the desire.
00:16:15.000
The denial of that, the object, is extremely, very linked to the presence of the third person who might steal the object from you.
00:16:27.000
And absence is a form of mediation.
00:16:31.000
So when you turn to literature, you found in the European fiction a variety of representations of this very simple thing.
00:16:41.000
Well, I think there are two types of writers, you know, what I call romantic writers.
00:16:46.000
The romantic writers believe in the genuineness and spontaneity of desire.
00:16:52.000
They believe that their choice of the object is dictated only by what they are and so forth.
00:16:58.000
I call them romantic writers, but the more interesting writers are the ones who realize the role of that third person and play with it in order to obtain the results.
00:17:12.000
Who would be these writers in your opinion?
00:17:15.000
Well, I think that in the European novel, the first great example is Cervantes.
00:17:23.000
You know, why does donkyoty want to become a knight-errant in a world with a normal knight-errant?
00:17:31.000
He's exactly like Francesca. He reads novels of Cervantes.
00:17:36.000
And this is because he reads novels of Cervantes.
00:17:41.000
That he wants to become a great hero. He imitates entities of goal,
00:17:47.000
who is a purely fictional character, of course, and the result is that he gets beaten black and blue on all the highways of Spain.
00:17:58.000
But he's very happy in the sense that he thinks he's the great disciple of entities and is going to re-establish knight-errant, which has disappeared for centuries.
00:18:11.000
So literature not only reveals this mechanisms of mimetic zire also proposes models of imitation for readers.
00:18:18.000
And of course, this is something we see everywhere, not only in readers of literature, but obviously moviegoers, television watchers.
00:18:28.000
I think it's undeniable that we're living a culture where we're steeped with the models of imitation that try to.
00:18:35.000
And of course, the more recent media are more powerful than the old ones. Today we try to get children to read books and not to watch television.
00:18:45.000
But in the old days, books were really fascinating because they played the role of television today, and they were temptation per se.
00:18:55.000
When you try to convince students that they should read them against their mimetic impulse,
00:19:01.000
Of course, you'll more or less tell them that they have no interest to them, that they are not going to get any incitement for them.
00:19:09.000
That's probably why it's so hard to teach literature today.
00:19:15.000
So for you, authors like Stondale, Flo Bette, I mean obviously Emma Bovacie is like a Francesca in a...
00:19:23.000
That's true, modern-day version of Francesca, who was nourished on cheap romantic fiction, we call it cheaper.
00:19:30.000
It was just a popular romantic fiction, which provided her with her concept of what it means to be a hero and so forth.
00:19:40.000
It's very interesting how you, in deceived desire in the novel, you do a whole sort of typology of emotions,
00:19:49.000
especially what we might call negative emotions.
00:19:52.000
Hatred, jealousy, envy, energy, resentment,
00:19:58.000
which are all linked to pride, of course, because if you have a rivalry, a mimetic rivalry, your vanity is involved,
00:20:07.000
and you want to win at all cost. It is the main fight anyway between two young men, two seduce of woman,
00:20:17.000
and they spend quite a bit of time, especially in Latin culture.
00:20:23.000
I think one of the reasons Anglo-Saxon culture is, which would I say, more economically dynamic and so forth,
00:20:34.000
it's because not energy is deviated into the sort of mimetic desire, which plays such an enormous role in the Italian little town, or in southern France,
00:20:46.000
or in Spain, and most of people spend their whole lives doing that.
00:20:52.000
I would raise a question that I'll ask you in a provocative spirit, which is perhaps what you're describing is correct and accurate when it comes to a culture like France,
00:21:03.000
which has had a long aristocratic tradition typically highly committed to forms of snobbery, vanity, and other Latin cultures, as you were mentioning,
00:21:15.000
if it doesn't apply equally well to Anglo-Saxon cultures, nothing about non-western cultures, to what extent is there a claims of universality?
00:21:26.000
There is a claim of universality because it doesn't matter which type of desire it is.
00:21:32.000
Of course, in these novels, sexual desire plays a greater role, but in a world of entrepreneurs, as you see in English,
00:21:42.000
the French are supposed not to have any word for that because that is a French word.
00:21:48.000
In the world of entrepreneurs, mimetic desire is very important too.
00:21:52.000
And the institution, which is a most mimetic of all, is the greatest institution, capitalist institution, or just talk market.
00:22:01.000
You desire a stock, not because it is objectively desirable.
00:22:06.000
You know nothing about what you desire a stock, exclusively because other people desire it.
00:22:12.000
And if other people desire it, its values grows up and up and up, and therefore in a way there, mimetic desire is absolute monarch.
00:22:22.000
It's an official thing.
00:22:24.000
And what is very interesting is that the analyst of the market had not yet discovered that.
00:22:30.000
When they tell you psychology is getting into the market, they mean that the mimetic wave, which next starts, lies, is getting out of bounds.
00:22:43.000
It has no more relationship to reality because of course, behind it there is objective information.
00:22:49.000
But the stock market is always threatened with a mimetic wave of such importance and such a lack of objectivity,
00:22:58.000
that there will inevitably be a collapse, which is also lacking in objectivity.
00:23:04.000
Just as a fashionable woman in Balzac, when she is abandoned by a lover, she may be abandoned by all potential lovers at the same time.
00:23:13.000
And it's a total disaster for her. She becomes like a stock that has lost its value.
00:23:19.000
The error of Marx was to believe that the economic aspect of these things is more fundamental than the other ones.
00:23:29.000
They are all equal.
00:23:30.000
There is no reason the error of Freud was to believe that the sexual aspect was the only one which was fundamental.
00:23:37.000
But the relationship between Freud and Marx, the mimetic desire reveals it.
00:23:43.000
Each one of them limits mimetic desire to one sector, one aspect of human activity, which is regarded as the only important one, the key to everything.
00:23:57.000
Whereas I take a theory of a mimetic desire is not a psychological theory.
00:24:01.000
No.
00:24:02.000
It's not based in psychological premises.
00:24:06.000
No, because it's human relations.
00:24:08.000
It's also the structures which obtain between people and not just within their own psyches.
00:24:17.000
It's also not from what I understand exclusively limited to human beings that there is a basis for it in the animal world.
00:24:26.000
In the animal world, you have what they call dominant patterns.
00:24:34.000
How are they established?
00:24:36.000
They are the males fighting for the females.
00:24:40.000
And the males are so eager to fight for the females that sometimes the females will disappear and they will continue to fight.
00:24:49.000
Just because they are menatically aroused and the fight is more important than the object.
00:24:57.000
But they will never kill each other.
00:24:59.000
Whereas human beings invent vengeance.
00:25:03.000
Vengeance is the ultimate form of an genetic rivalry because each act of vengeance is the exact imitation of the preceding one.
00:25:14.000
If you study vengeance, you realize how mimises imitation is all over the place in all manifestations of desire.
00:25:24.000
So in human beings it's pushed to such an extreme that you have death.
00:25:30.000
You have vengeance which cannot be limited.
00:25:35.000
That's why I said in my opening remarks about why can't we have an institution devoted strictly to the study of vengeance, for example.
00:25:45.000
And to work out its logic, reciprocal violence, these kind of things, it seems like we are far from having overcome this sort of behavior that is characterized human history throughout all these centuries.
00:25:58.000
But let's move on to another emotion which is closely linked obviously to hatred, vengeance, and jealousy.
00:26:06.000
It's envy.
00:26:07.000
And we'll talk about your book on Shakespeare which you chose to entitled it The Order of Envy.
00:26:13.000
But before we talk about Shakespeare specifically, I think envy is a highly underrated emotion among human relations.
00:26:24.000
How do you see the role of Envy?
00:26:26.000
I see it exactly in the same way.
00:26:30.000
I think that envy today is the most, what should I say, the emotion which plays the greatest role in our society, which is all directed towards money.
00:26:42.000
And therefore you envy the people who have more than you have.
00:26:46.000
And you cannot talk about your envy.
00:26:49.000
I think the reason we talk so much about sex is that we don't dare talk about envy.
00:26:55.000
The real repressed, the real repression is the repression of Envy.
00:27:01.000
And of course envy is the mimetic.
00:27:04.000
You cannot help imitating your model.
00:27:07.000
And of course if you want money very badly, you're going to go into the same business that man is in and so forth.
00:27:16.000
And more likely than not, you will be destroyed by strength.
00:27:21.000
So when people talk about masochism and so forth, they are still talking about the imadic desire.
00:27:27.000
They are talking about the fact that we move always to the greatest strength in the direction of the desire we envy most.
00:27:38.000
You know, in the direction of the thing we envy most.
00:27:41.000
And we do because that power is greater than ours.
00:27:46.000
And probably is going to defeat us again.
00:27:49.000
So there will be repetition, what Freud calls repetition in psychological life, which is linked to the fact that we are possessed.
00:27:58.000
But what has defeated us the first time?
00:28:01.000
Our victorious rival in lovemaking becomes a permanent model.
00:28:07.000
So novelists like Dostoyevsky, you know, and Cervantes himself, will show you characters who literally ask their rival to choose for them the girl they should love.
00:28:25.000
In the Middle Ages envy was often depicted iconographically as a woman blindfolded.
00:28:31.000
And I think it probably has to do with a false etymology of envy as not having sight.
00:28:37.000
Is there a deucey of blindness at the heart of envy in this regard or a voice?
00:28:42.000
Is there a blind spot in our own failure to recognize envy as one of the most dominant passions of our own society?
00:28:50.000
Yes, it's a most difficult to acknowledge because it involves your being, you know.
00:28:56.000
In a way envy is a denial of one's own being and accepting the fact that you prefer the being of your rival.
00:29:05.000
And this is so hateful to you that it awakens a desire for murder, for murder of that other new envy and cannot repress that envy.
00:29:18.000
Sometimes murder, but you can say also in other cases admiration and...
00:29:22.000
Not the same thing.
00:29:23.000
Well, hopefully they have different outcomes.
00:29:27.000
Yeah, I'm thinking whether the advertising industry is not...
00:29:31.000
Does it know what you're saying the lesson of envy very, very well?
00:29:35.000
Well, I think they know it very well because if you really look at advertising,
00:29:39.000
they are never trying to demonstrate to you that the object they are selling is the best possible from an objective point of view.
00:29:48.000
From the point of view of scientific objectivity.
00:29:53.000
They are always trying to prove to you that this object is desired and possessed by the people you would like to be.
00:30:01.000
Therefore Coca-Cola is drawing on a very beautiful beach, marvelous sun, a bunch of people sent fan in an ideal way.
00:30:10.000
We are always between the age of 16 and 22.
00:30:15.000
Well, everything you would like to be.
00:30:17.000
We are obviously very little close because they have a most shapely body, but very expensive and so forth.
00:30:24.000
So everything you might envy.
00:30:26.000
And therefore there is something sacramental.
00:30:29.000
Religion is always mixed up in these things.
00:30:32.000
If you consume Coca-Cola, maybe if you consume a lot of it, you will become a little bit like these people you would like to be.
00:30:39.000
It is like a kind of eucharist that will turn you into the person you really admire.
00:30:48.000
So why this title for your Shakespeare book?
00:30:51.000
The Order of Envy.
00:30:52.000
And it really comes from a very specific text.
00:30:56.000
Tom and Ernie Poe which is the Rape of Lucrice.
00:31:00.000
And the Rape of Lucrice is the story of all the male population in Rome which is in a camp, you know, because they are fighting a war.
00:31:13.000
And in the evening they talk about their wives.
00:31:16.000
And one of them, Colatinos in Latin, Colatine, describes his wife in such glowing ways that talk with the son of the nephew of the king.
00:31:29.000
During the night, lives on his horse, goes to Rome and rapes the woman.
00:31:37.000
In the original story by Livy, he sees the woman first.
00:31:44.000
In other words, he falls in love with her, he realizes she is all things, she is as beautiful as her husband described her.
00:31:54.000
In the story by Shakespeare, he suppresses that part.
00:31:58.000
She, he writes the woman, sight and scene, he is not seen her.
00:32:04.000
He is aroused only by the words of her husband.
00:32:08.000
So in other words Shakespeare there emphasizes the paradoxical aspect of her, I mean, I think the side.
00:32:14.000
The role of what I call the mediator, who is the husband.
00:32:18.000
It's the reason I think why most critics regard the rape of Lucris as a mad poor, you know, they don't know.
00:32:25.000
And they hate it. They dislike it, I think.
00:32:28.000
Because it tries to show to them what's really important for Shakespeare, the word.
00:32:34.000
And we of so rich it thing, this line is essential.
00:32:41.000
Yeah, that it shows that also it would seem to lack plausibility except if one understands my medic desire the way you do.
00:32:51.000
Because the idea of going to rape a woman's sight unseen would seem not to follow rules of bare as a military, whereas if one would advise into your thing.
00:33:00.000
No, no, I think that's up to a point that does not follow the rules of the mediator.
00:33:05.000
Very similar to much Shakespeare in a way, exaggerates in order to show you the truth, you know, in order to make it visible.
00:33:15.000
Yeah, one of the claims of your book is, and this has irks some critics one has to admit this, is that Shakespeare understood the truth.
00:33:24.000
He was the one literary author among the whole canon who really understood it thoroughly and theoretically, and had such a mastery with regard to the memetic phenomenon that he was able to imbued in all of his plays and to give us a corpus of works which do become this whole theater in this case of the dynamic of the
00:33:52.000
the dynamics of memetic desire everywhere.
00:33:56.000
And you as the commentator on Shakespeare claim him as your great sort of predecessor in the discovery of a memetic desire.
00:34:10.000
And one has to say that it's not the first time someone has claimed the authority of Shakespeare on behalf of a theory we know how Freud used him and so forth, but you really see him primarily as the poet of memetic desire.
00:34:27.000
Is that correct?
00:34:28.000
I see him primarily as the poet of memetic desire. If you take a play like in its emanate stream, you will know you would observe that two men are always tend to be in love with the same girl.
00:34:45.000
Then they suddenly change, supposedly because of the love Jews which is put into their eyes, and they both fall in love with the other girl.
00:34:57.000
And then they become rivals. So I really think that in the play the theme of the theories which is greatly emphasized by most people who represent Shakespeare on the stage should be understood as the way human beings in archaic societies fail to recognize memetic desire.
00:35:21.000
Myth and stories of that type are always excuses in order to explain through miraculous means the bad consequences of memetic desire.
00:35:36.000
Do you think Shakespeare understood that?
00:35:38.000
I think he has a way.
00:35:39.000
Or how to choose love by another's eyes is one of the essential lines of that play.
00:35:48.000
In other words, hell is really when you choose love by another's eyes and you are inevitably drawn into a conflict of jealousy and a problem with your friend.
00:36:02.000
Which is the story of memetic, the myths of an ice cream is nothing else.
00:36:09.000
You claim in your book that the memetic phenomena is much more present in the comedies than the tragedies.
00:36:18.000
Or at least it's present in such a way that it's much more obvious.
00:36:21.000
Much more obvious because you can have all sorts of arrangements, you know, and precisely I mentioned before the two gentlemen of all that's of who?
00:36:32.000
The first place of Shakespeare, you have only one pair of lovers, two boys who are in love with the same girl.
00:36:39.000
And beginning after that you have two pairs and the two pairs are entangled with each other.
00:36:46.000
Therefore it's like a ballet, you know.
00:36:49.000
And if you look at the shape of a ballet of a movement, you can assume in a way that behind it there is a form of memetic rivalry too.
00:36:58.000
You see because ultimately we are moving towards a type of art in which gestures and words and so forth are all in a way symmetrically arranged because of memetic rivalry.
00:37:13.000
The more memetic rivalry you have to set with someone, the more different you fear from that person.
00:37:20.000
Whereas in reality you always do the same thing, you always act in the same way.
00:37:27.000
And in a way that differences collapse, as the differences collapse, the characters become literally doubles of each other, they act in the same way, they speak the same way.
00:37:40.000
And they have a feeling that they are imitated by the other who is making fun of them, but this imitation in fact is compulsive.
00:37:48.000
This is hernia and Helena in its own history.
00:37:54.000
Let's take a test case of Hamlet, because in the literary criticism Hamlet, it's considered to be maybe one of the first modern consciousnesses that is at odds with itself.
00:38:08.000
It's an internalized self, speaks to itself, seems to be removed from the alienated from society, and would seem to be that exactly the kind of character who is free from this externalized circuit of the promiscuous circulation of desire around him.
00:38:26.000
He withdraws within himself and sees the birth of the romantic inward melon.
00:38:32.000
But doing much of the play, in fact he is, and that's why it cannot do what society requires of him, which is revenge.
00:38:42.000
He sees the similarity between his father and his uncle. They are both murderers, you know they hate each other, but they are memetic characters.
00:38:51.000
And he sees the futility of the whole world. He sees the futility of love, revenge.
00:38:54.000
That's right.
00:38:55.000
And then what happens? I mean in what way can we say that Hamlet ends up becoming a victim of the very...
00:39:03.000
Well, it's not that he's...
00:39:05.000
There is another plot inside the plot, which is really the whole story of Polonius, killed by Hamlet.
00:39:14.000
And then, there is the son of Polonius, in many ways is the anti-Hammlet. He is as willing and ready to commit to vengeance.
00:39:26.000
Hamlet is unable to commit. He is ready to mourn his sister in a very powerful, emotional way.
00:39:37.000
And when Hamlet sees this, he says the bravery of his grief put me into a towering passion, a towering rage.
00:39:54.000
And this means that out of imitation of Laertes, he will become able to kill Laertes and to start the vengeance process, which he could not start before.
00:40:08.000
Because Laertes is closer to him, and is very different, but becomes a model of the menerictus are, which he feels unconsciously, and which an imitation finally.
00:40:22.000
So it resolves the tension and the inability to act, which comes before. The inability to act in our world is in a way and awareness of the stupidity of the menerictus are, and how equivalent things are to each other.
00:40:40.000
The more you act, the more you get into these menerict situations, which are circular.
00:40:46.000
Would that be the essence of the tragedy? This is Shakespeare, you know, most tragic writers are not that modern. Shakespeare there, in a way, interpreted, at least I don't claim total truth. You know, I want to be modern.
00:41:04.000
But I think that Shakespeare is enormously modern. What he says is it's very difficult to keep a revenge tragedy going on for five hours or three hours, you know, and in order to do it, we must have a hero who is unable to get revenge.
00:41:23.000
The hero who does not believe in the situation, he does not believe in the virtue of his mother, he does not believe in the difference between his uncle and his father, which he does not believe in anything, he should believe.
00:41:37.000
And he's surprised when he sees that an actor who should know it's not true, is capable of shedding real tears for the Queen of Troy, Acuba.
00:41:49.000
Acuba, for Acuba, that actor can shed tears, and I cannot shed them in my real family life. The theatre scene is very important.
00:42:01.000
In that sense. What's, what's heck you but a hammer, he's a heck you about that. Yeah, what's heck you about that?
00:42:07.000
But I think that is tragic that one can understand the madness of reciprocal violence and the forms of vengeance and the perpetuation of those cycles, and at the same time not be able to resist falling into their pattern again.
00:42:30.000
And that would seem to give a deep sort of pessimism to a play like Hamlet, that even if, as I was saying at the beginning of the program, we were to create these institutions that would undertake a massive study of things like vengeance, reciprocal violence and so forth.
00:42:48.000
Why is it that human behavior is so resistant to adapting itself to what the mind knows.
00:42:57.000
It's still a big, it's the same way. That's your question. But in many instances we actually don't, you know.
00:43:04.000
If you really look at the situation, many people pull back from the mirror situations in the sense that Hamlet does.
00:43:13.000
And in a way is not modern wisdom very much this. We don't analyze completely an American situation.
00:43:22.000
But we are aware we are in a situation which is totally classical, which is present all over the world in thousands of examples at every minute, every second.
00:43:34.000
And we pull back from it because we don't want to repeat something we know too well is going to end in exactly the same fashion as all previous examples.
00:43:50.000
One more case from Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet. That is a play where two lovers seem to have a completely unmediated relationship one to the other.
00:44:03.000
What do you make of Romeo and Juliet in terms of memetic desire?
00:44:08.000
Well, I really believe that Shakespeare there wrote a romantic play. In other words Romeo and Juliet, unlike do not play tricks on each other.
00:44:23.000
So, most people always quote "O meo and Juliet" as the play who contradicts my thesis. But at the same time Shakespeare gives you many clues of the way you do it.
00:44:40.000
The reason Romeo and Juliet fall in love with each other is that they shouldn't. They are separated by the blood feud.
00:44:48.000
They belong to the two different tribes that are constantly fighting. So if you look at the language of Romeo and Juliet, what is the language of the love of memetic desire?
00:45:01.000
In Shakespeare, it's the oxymoron. I love hate this girl. You know, love and hate are always together.
00:45:10.000
And people don't realize that the reason for the oxymoron is that love and hate are always mixed. In the case of Romeo and Juliet, they are not mixed.
00:45:21.000
But Romeo and Juliet can use the language of hatred and violence because they are on both sides of the blood feud.
00:45:33.000
I love my beloved enemy. Is the fundamental expression of love in the 16th, 17th century? And in Romeo and Juliet, it really means he is a capulet and a memento-gue.
00:45:50.000
Therefore, you can suppress memetic desire, but it is there underneath in the language because you have the blood feud that brings you the violence you need in order to have convincing passion.
00:46:06.000
I remember Zippiedely had a film version of Romeo and Juliet where he wanted to end with the great romantic myth of love. And the two lovers are there on the stage in the final scene, just alone.
00:46:21.000
But I think in the original play, there is a dead body who comes there and can't remember now. Who is it that Romeo slays?
00:46:30.000
Romeo slays parents.
00:46:33.000
And Paris is there at the end, along with the two lovers in the original play.
00:46:41.000
And that is a hindrance.
00:46:43.000
But there is something else that shows us that Shakespeare did not take the conclusion.
00:46:50.000
Because the thing which is funny about the conclusion of Romeo and Juliet is that they love each other sincerely. But the blood feud, the parents are willing, they can get married.
00:47:02.000
There is no obstacle between them. So they have to create the obstacle.
00:47:06.000
When Juliet does not wake up at the right second she is supposed to wake up, they stupid Romeo kills himself.
00:47:14.000
Therefore, when finally Juliet can wake up, wakes up, she can see that he is dead and she kills herself.
00:47:24.000
Now, at least about the same time as Romeo and Juliet,
00:47:31.000
He takes the rotisetta of that ending, saying, "Look at these fools who believe in the true love there,
00:47:40.000
whereas in fact these lovers are the victims of stupid misunderstanding.
00:47:51.000
If they do that, you have the story of Pyramus and Pispy in the midst of an ice dream,
00:47:59.000
in which the same thing happened, they are supposed to be separated by their parents.
00:48:05.000
They give each other an appointment, and when Pyramus shows up in the forest, he finds a lion there, which is chewing the scar of Pispy.
00:48:20.000
And he kills himself. Two minutes later, Pispy comes back, finding Pyramus dead, she kills herself.
00:48:31.000
And of course, it is a parody of Romeo and Juliet. It means, look what the ending of Romeo and Juliet has to be,
00:48:41.000
in order to make it harder, incredible when you have two young people who love each other,
00:48:46.000
and it is simply not true that their parents are separating them. They are perfectly ready to accept their marriage.
00:48:57.000
I have to tell our listeners that I've known a "Ronya" long time, and I can ask them about any text in this real literature,
00:49:04.000
and I will be thoroughly convinced that memetic desire is absolutely everywhere,
00:49:10.000
and that the theory is finally unfalcifiable. This is an issue now, hold on.
00:49:17.000
That's a proper thing, in order for a theory to be true, there has to be certain conditions under which is falsifiable.
00:49:23.000
So let me ask you, under what conditions do you think your theory of memetic desire is possible?
00:49:29.000
No, but I think that Romeo and Juliet in a way is Shakespeare himself, showing you that if you do away with memetic,
00:49:39.800
you have to use other prompts that recreate it, Haji. You can write a comedy. Comedy is a more honest genre,
00:49:48.800
I fear, than tragedy, but in order to have it Haji, you must bring in, you know, underhandedly something like the blood feud,
00:49:58.800
which has just ready-made violence. It's been going on for generations, and you have the sun of one tribe,
00:50:07.800
make love to the girl of the other tribe. If you look at the balcony scene between Romeo and Juliet, you know, they are very young people, she's about 13.
00:50:16.800
It's supposed to be the greatest love scene in Shakespeare, but what do they talk about? They talk about the henchmen of the family who are down there in the bushes, trying to kill Romeo.
00:50:30.800
If you really look at the balcony scene, there is no language of love. They cannot see much to each other, but they can talk a lot about the henchmen of the two families that are fighting that are going to kill Romeo. That's what Juliet is worried about.
00:50:48.800
They have not much to see because Juliet has already accepted to make love to Romeo, and Romeo is about to do it.
00:50:57.800
I promise I wouldn't do this, but I think I have to ask whether we've been talking about literature and memetic desire within individuals in relations between individuals, but blood feuds, vengeance, reciprocal violence.
00:51:14.800
These are also geopolitical realities in the world we live in. Do you see any sort of pulling back from the endless repetition of the old cycles?
00:51:30.800
Or do you see a danger of a kind of vortex in which we never really get beyond cycles of reciprocal violence in political terms?
00:51:42.800
I think we are free. It's a question of understanding and of real human beings are so passionate that they always get caught in the old traps.
00:51:57.800
We ourselves do. We are committed to what we do. We want to succeed. And we always succeed at the expense of someone. And therefore, I really think we are moving more and more towards more and more violence because of rivalry.
00:52:17.800
I've talked a lot about literature, but recently I read a book which is very informative for me, which was close to its on war. It was a great through.
00:52:28.800
And what caused it, he calls war a chameleon, and he says it says rise to the extremes.
00:52:37.800
And he says in order to win, you have to imitate your enemy constantly. And if you start reading in class with it carefully, you can see it works exactly like an American novel which would be explicated.
00:52:53.800
Because fundamentally, a drama in novel is a war. It doesn't matter which side wins. And the cause of its does not teach you how to win. But he constantly shows you the mimetic nature of war. In order to beat the French, you know, he was a Prussian during Napoleon's victory.
00:53:14.800
In order to beat the French, you must have a popular war. You must draft everybody. So here we see the move towards total war. And he sees very well too that the technical side of war, the power of the artillery, for instance, is a mimetic game. If you have a big gun, I must have a bigger gun than you have.
00:53:37.800
So in other words, he shows us the move towards total war and total mimetic conflict.
00:53:47.800
If they were to listen to you, what would you propose to politicians in order to try to avoid falling into this syndrome?
00:53:54.800
Well, I think that knowledge, it's a complicated question because my vision fundamentally is religious. And I believe in non-violence. And I believe in the knowledge of violence being able to teach you to reject violence.
00:54:16.800
Because it will show you that we are always getting into a game which is exactly like the previous ones, which is going to be a constant repetition.
00:54:25.800
You ever Hamlet already saw that? It didn't save him. Ah, but he had to bring in, you know, Shakespeare had to bring in laterties. And if laterties had been another Hamlet, there would have been no end to the play.
00:54:39.800
So it would have been the end of tragedy, but when Shakespeare wrote Hamlet, what he said is untiled of tragedy, and he's really very close to the end of tragedy. And after that, he goes to the romances, and the romances, it's really a bunch of characters who repent.
00:54:59.800
Their violence, these are mimetic desire for vengeance, like guarantees in the winter tale.
00:55:06.800
Their aunties become aware that he's been a wild man totally mad by suspecting his wife of being unfaithful with his friend.
00:55:20.800
You know.
00:55:22.800
Honei, you're going to be a frequent guest on this program, I hope. Today, we've only really scratched the surface. We're trying to get clear some of the fundamentals about the concept of mimetic desire.
00:55:34.800
There's a way in which after your first book there on deceit desire and the novel, you extended it into an anthropological realm.
00:55:42.800
And you went on to write books like Violence and the Sacred and Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World, where you come up with essentially what amounts to an anthropogenic theory of human culture based on scapegoat rituals and sacrifice and the violent origins of religion.
00:56:03.800
And the next time you're on this program, we're going to go from here to that issue of sacrifice and scapegoating.
00:56:12.800
So, I want all our listeners to stay tuned for that. It's going to be soon. Meanwhile, thank you very much, Honei.
00:56:18.800
I'm sure it would be just as present as today.
00:56:21.800
Oh, it will be. So, please stay tuned. There's a second installment of enlightened opinions coming up.
00:56:29.800
We have a guest here in the studio, another professor from Stanford, and you're nothing to want to miss it.
00:56:35.800
[Music]
00:56:45.800
[Music]
00:57:11.800
[Music]
00:57:21.800
[Music]
00:57:47.800
[Music]
00:57:57.800
[Music]
00:58:07.800
[Music]
00:58:15.800
[Music]
00:58:25.800
[Music]
00:58:35.800
[Music]