table of contents

01/24/2006

Kathryn Todd on Henry David Thoreau

Kathryn Todd is a graduate student in the Physics Department at Stanford University. She completed her B.S. in Physics and Literature at Caltech in 2001. She is also the current Program Director at KZSU 90.1 FM.

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[Music]
00:00:17.000
This is KZSU Stanford.
00:00:21.000
Welcome to entitled opinions.
00:00:23.000
My name is Robert Harrison.
00:00:27.000
And we're coming to you live from the Stanford campus.
00:00:30.000
[Music]
00:00:51.000
Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion.
00:01:01.000
That's what Dasman says.
00:01:03.000
But is it true?
00:01:06.000
Is everybody entitled to an opinion?
00:01:10.000
That's a question we're not going to resolve here today.
00:01:13.000
All I know is that on this show, everyone is entitled to my opinions
00:01:18.000
and to the opinions of my guests.
00:01:21.000
We're not miserly here.
00:01:24.000
We're in fact exceedingly generous with our opinions.
00:01:28.000
We're here to instruct and delight and to talk about literature.
00:01:33.000
So is everybody in?
00:01:36.000
Is everybody in?
00:01:38.000
The symposium is about to begin.
00:01:43.000
[Music]
00:01:53.000
[Music]
00:02:13.000
I learned this at least by my experiment that if one advances
00:02:17.000
confidently in the direction of his dreams
00:02:20.000
and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success
00:02:25.000
unexpected in common hours.
00:02:28.000
He will put some things behind, will pass an invisible boundary,
00:02:33.000
new universal and more liberal laws will begin to establish themselves
00:02:38.000
around and within him,
00:02:40.000
or the old laws be expanded and interpreted in his favor
00:02:45.000
in a more liberal sense.
00:02:47.000
And he will live with the license of a higher order of beings.
00:02:52.000
In proportion as he simplifies his life, the laws of the universe
00:02:57.000
will appear less complex and solitude will not be solitude,
00:03:02.000
nor poverty, poverty, nor weakness, weakness.
00:03:07.000
If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost.
00:03:12.000
That is where they should be.
00:03:15.000
Now put the foundations under them.
00:03:19.000
[Music]
00:03:21.000
That is a paragraph from the conclusion of Walden by Henry David Thoreau
00:03:26.000
whom we are going to be talking about this hour.
00:03:29.000
But first let me throw out an opinion.
00:03:33.000
I think we should have a citizens test in this country.
00:03:36.000
That is right, a citizens test to be taken say by the age of 25 or 30.
00:03:43.000
Not the kind of thing that if you failed it you would lose your citizenship.
00:03:47.000
Just something that goes on record.
00:03:51.000
Citizens test past or citizens test failed.
00:03:56.000
It would require I suppose that you demonstrate a basic familiarity with American history,
00:04:01.000
some knowledge of the Constitution,
00:04:04.000
a solid understanding of the rights of the citizen,
00:04:08.000
and also the responsibilities of a citizen in a republic.
00:04:13.000
And if I were drawing up the test,
00:04:16.000
I would require that you be able to recite by heart,
00:04:19.000
Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.
00:04:22.000
And at least ten memorable lines from the speeches of Martin Luther King
00:04:26.000
and maybe five lines from JFK's speeches.
00:04:31.000
The reason I bring this up is because I would also require
00:04:35.000
that the person taking the test be able to give a rudimentary account of Walden
00:04:40.000
and on civil disobedience.
00:04:43.000
Two books by Thoreau that I believe are part of the founding scripture of this nation.
00:04:49.000
At least that's my opinion,
00:04:52.000
which I know is not shared by everyone,
00:04:55.000
but as I said before everyone is entitled to it.
00:05:00.000
Now why would I privilege Thoreau over someone like Melville or Ed Geralen Poe
00:05:06.000
or any number of other great American writers?
00:05:10.000
The reason is that Thoreau, in my view,
00:05:14.000
consistently challenges his fellow citizens to think about what it means to be an American.
00:05:20.000
And what kind of society we as citizens want to live in,
00:05:24.000
whether we're on the right track or the wrong track,
00:05:28.000
and whether the dominant values of American society,
00:05:31.000
such as the accumulation of wealth and property,
00:05:35.000
serve to promote happiness and the cause of freedom,
00:05:39.000
or whether they in fact meditate against our spiritual well-being and civic freedom.
00:05:45.000
Almost every sentence in those two books put America on trial.
00:05:50.000
And if America is going to live up to its promise,
00:05:53.000
it has to continuously put itself on trial.
00:05:59.000
One thing Thoreau insists on over and over is that you should never, ever accept the opinions of other people
00:06:07.000
without verifying them for yourself.
00:06:10.000
And that includes above all his opinions.
00:06:13.000
So in Good Thoreau, in Spirit, we're going to put Thoreau himself on trial during the next hour.
00:06:19.000
Does he really live up to my billing?
00:06:22.000
Is he worth reading?
00:06:24.000
Did he practice what he preached?
00:06:27.000
We'll be discussing these issues with a special guest who joins me here in the studio.
00:06:33.000
Her name is Catherine Todd, and she has a talk show of her own on KZSU.
00:06:38.000
Catherine, welcome.
00:06:40.000
Catherine, you're a graduate student here at Stanford.
00:06:48.000
That's right.
00:06:49.000
In the Department of Physics?
00:06:50.000
That's right.
00:06:51.000
Yeah.
00:06:52.000
Can you tell us something about what you're working on, what your research consists in?
00:06:56.000
Well, in a very broad sense, all of the people in the lab that I work in are trying to understand the behavior of electrons and materials.
00:07:06.000
One of the things that I think is really beautiful and fascinating about this field of research is that,
00:07:12.000
for a long time, physicists have worked to understand the smallest, the most elemental components of matter of the world.
00:07:23.000
Can we understand everything about one electron?
00:07:25.000
Can we strip the world down to just one electron and understand everything about it, for instance?
00:07:31.000
But lately, that approach has been changed in some fields.
00:07:38.000
People are still working to break matter down into its fundamentals and understand those fundamentals.
00:07:44.000
But this other approach has arisen, which is that people have realized that if you understand everything, there is to understand about one electron.
00:07:55.000
It's charged and it's spin and it's mass.
00:07:58.000
That doesn't necessarily mean that you understand the behavior of a piece of matter that has 10 to the 23rd electrons in it.
00:08:06.000
And people are beginning to understand that in order to really have a good understanding of the world around you, you have to understand not only the fundamental parts, but how they relate to each other.
00:08:18.000
And it turns out that you can get this really complex and beautiful behavior from the simple interaction of many simple parts.
00:08:26.000
And so that's what I love about the field of research that I'm in.
00:08:32.000
Well, this is fascinating because I think something similar hopefully is going on in the field of genetic research.
00:08:39.000
And you know how it is. There's this reductionism that has dominated certain fields of the science where you think that if you can just understand the gene and decode its sequence, then you have the secret to all of life.
00:08:57.000
Now people are understanding from what I'm told, and an expert by any means, from what I'm told, that it's all in the interaction of the gene with the cell and the cell with the organism and the organism with its environment.
00:09:14.000
There's a sense of a world to which all these things belong. Would you say that that's a kind of premise that is taking hold in your field?
00:09:27.000
I think that that's very true. I mean, as I said, there are still people. There are still things that aren't known about the simplest components of matter.
00:09:34.000
But I think that we have enough knowledge to begin to build things up again and realize that there's as much richness in the interactions as in the things themselves.
00:09:43.000
That's great. And you're at a good stage in your research.
00:09:46.000
Well.
00:09:47.000
Can we expect any great discoveries from you soon?
00:09:50.000
I don't know about any great discoveries. This all sounds very grand. These wonderful ideas about interactions and the fundamental nature of the universe.
00:10:00.000
But actually, what one does every day as an experimental physicist is mostly, sodders, wires to things and curses when they break.
00:10:11.000
And this is sort of a Theruvian idea. I wanted to be an experimental physicist because I didn't want to spend my whole life doing only one kind of thing.
00:10:22.000
I wanted to be a person who could build something with my hands and build something with my mind. I wanted to spend my days thinking and doing.
00:10:32.000
And I felt like in a world where many people live such specialized lives, spend their whole work lives sitting in front of one computer screen and doing one thing.
00:10:43.000
I thought that being an experimental physicist would give me a chance to lead in a way almost to craftsmen like life, thinking and doing.
00:10:52.000
Yeah, that does have connections to the row. In more ways than one, he talks about Walden. He calls the two years that he spent there an experiment.
00:11:04.000
And he keeps using that word experiment in a, I would say, quasi-scientific manner because what he means by experiment is trying to establish the matters of fact.
00:11:16.000
Nothing matters of fact about matter or a scientific phenomenon, but really the matters of fact about life in America in this nation at that particular time in history.
00:11:27.000
Well, I have my own doubts about claiming the row as a person who is in some way in spirit as scientists, but we can argue about that later.
00:11:39.000
I guess the one thing that I wanted to say is that even that idea of being a craftsman sounds very wonderful and Theruvian, but I find actually that I get frustrated with wires breaking and sometimes I wish that I could be a person less of hands and more of mind and just wave.
00:11:56.000
You know, wave my magic wand and make things work and not break.
00:12:01.000
Would there be any satisfaction at the end of it though? That's the question.
00:12:05.000
Well, you know, there might be, but or there might not, but there would certainly be much less frustration.
00:12:11.000
Okay, well, let's talk a little bit about the row. First, let me ask you, you're obviously not an expert on the row. No one here is as such.
00:12:22.000
And it's the whole point of our discussion today is not to bring a scholarly academic sort of perspective to bear on the row, but really to speak as Americans.
00:12:31.000
And to probe the question of to what extent has the rose legacy been inherited, to what extent it deserves to be inherited or not?
00:12:40.000
And I guess I would begin by asking.
00:12:44.000
Would you agree with part of my opening statement there about the rose importance as a kind of consummate American who kept putting his nation on trial by asking the kind of questions that were uncomfortable to hear for the row and his neighbors?
00:13:05.000
I agree with you that the rose writings are in some sense these important founding documents of America that and I can point to almost every important movement in American history after the row.
00:13:24.000
I feel like I can say these elements of this are are the row. People are are trying to carry out these ideals in some way, but when I think of movements like that, I think of as many movements that I view as negative as positive.
00:13:42.000
I feel like in some ways this this influence and I agree with you that there is this very strong influence that the row still wields over American culture, but I think that it's pernicious as often as it is.
00:13:56.000
For nicious is a very strong word to use in this context first thing. Before I hear why you think it's pernicious I'm not sure that the row has had such a major impact. I don't believe that he's had the impact that he deserves to have had in our culture. Yes, obviously he's a classic and he's venerated, but whether you know America is the
00:14:20.160
the row of you in any real sense that the question we're going to leave open, but why pernicious? Well, I think and I don't want to come across as a as an inflexible through a hater. I think that many of the things that the
00:14:37.160
was not so was not for our wonderful things, but I think that there are certain ways in which he is blind and and those ways are ways in which we continue to be blind as Americans or there are certain ways in which he is
00:14:54.160
unfeeling and those are ways in which we continue in America to be unfeeling and the biggest you're going to have to explain. You can have to explain those are two things blind and feeling.
00:15:05.160
I think that they are similar in certain ways and maybe it will make more sense when I say that I think that his worst sin is that he seems to me to care nothing about community.
00:15:22.160
And almost to believe that community is not really in some sense possible that there's no way that we can understand each other and there's no way that we can help each other.
00:15:33.160
And I think that this continues to be an American idea, the idea that the idea of self-reliance and the idea of finding your own way.
00:15:46.160
I think that's a negative aspect of American culture.
00:15:51.160
Well, okay, we put through an trial and you're prosecuting, let me defend.
00:15:57.160
And first, take issue with the statement that through had no concern for community.
00:16:05.160
And I would find that contradicts first the very gesture of writing a book like Walden,
00:16:14.160
which in his epigraph he says that he wants to sing as lustily as a chantalier and brag, I don't remember the exact words here.
00:16:24.160
If only to wake my neighbors up.
00:16:26.160
This is a book that is addressed very specifically to his neighbors or to those of you who are said to live in New England.
00:16:35.160
That's a great kind of jab.
00:16:38.160
And he said that he moved a mile from any neighbor, which I think we have to understand as him insisting on being within your shot of his neighbor and trying to engage with his neighbor, even if it was at a certain margin of distance.
00:17:01.160
So what do you make of the kind of social act that writing a book like Walden entails?
00:17:08.160
Well, I agree that writing a book is fundamentally a social act, but I would actually point to the text itself as evidence that he does this almost under protest.
00:17:19.160
There was this one sentence that really stuck in my craw near the beginning of Walden.
00:17:24.160
He says he's complaining about how people older than him, people with more experience than him have never given him good advice that people older than him are experts in their way of living, but that he needs to find a different way of living for himself.
00:17:41.160
And he says I've lived some 30 years on this planet and I've yet to hear the first syllable of valuable or even earnest advice from my seniors.
00:17:48.160
And I couldn't help thinking on reading that sentence. Then why are you giving me advice? What do you think if nobody has ever had anything useful to say to you, what possibly, you know, what do you have to give to me?
00:17:59.160
Well, he does have a way of stating things which are meant to provoke, but there I think he's just taking on this whole supposition that wisdom lies with the elders.
00:18:17.160
And we should obsequiously listen to the opinions of our elders and blindly sort of embrace them, repeat them, reproduce them without thinking for ourselves.
00:18:29.160
And we have to remember just how gerontocratic American society was in the 19th century where the elders really had a kind of absolute power when it came to the mores and the customs and the sort of beliefs that they were.
00:18:46.160
So I think that there he's trying to debunk this common assumption that the elders always know better.
00:18:56.160
Then you say, well, why is he trying to give me his opinions? But again, I would say that the purpose of Walden is not to disseminate his opinions or impose them on you, but try to wake you up or us up to the necessity to think for ourselves.
00:19:13.160
Well, this is sort of a side point, but I just want to say that one of the things that's hard for me about reading Thoreau is that he is such a provocateur, that in some sense you're not being fair to him if you take what he says at face value, that he's always trying to shock you and get under your skin.
00:19:34.160
And so you almost can't analyze him calmly if you don't discount in some sense what he says.
00:19:42.160
I thought your introduction to the piece, by the way, was very the rovian in its provocativeness and fireiness.
00:19:51.160
And I thought that as a surly 25 to 30 year old who read Thoreau in high school only under protest I probably would fail my citizenship test.
00:20:02.160
Yeah, well, you would have to study for it. But here's what, here's how I would answer that charge at least, which is that Thoreau was an ornery guy and he wrote in a way that he knew was intended to actually distress his reader.
00:20:24.160
In fact, Emerson, his friend Emerson confessed that when he read Thoreau, he always at every sentence he read made him nervous and wretched.
00:20:36.160
And Thoreau really wanted, I suppose, people to feel nervous and wretched when they read him.
00:20:42.160
So that might be part of his whole agenda to the provocator and stating things overstating them as it were.
00:20:52.160
But by getting back to the notion of his anti-communitarianism, there is, I mean the obvious point to make, which I'll say in passing, but I'm really on my way to something else, is that he talks a great deal about how people have said to him, why are you doing this project of going to live in the woods and when you could be, if you really want to do something worthwhile for your life with your life,
00:21:21.160
why not devote all that energy to being charitable, why not adopt a poor family in the village and he says charity is always a nuisance to the people who are being helped that this is, I couldn't find any family that wanted to be adopted, he says.
00:21:46.160
And it's true, of course, that he is saying something that's partially true and of course the sort of interfering charity where you go to someone and analyze their life and say what you really need is this and I'm going to give it to you now.
00:22:04.160
I mean undoubtedly what he says about that is very true, but I think that it's wrong of him to abandon this project, not of determining for other people what they need and giving it to them, but improving our common world.
00:22:24.160
I think that he sets up sort of a straw man when he says that charitableness is only interference and never right.
00:22:35.160
Yeah, that's a very strong moment in the text where he's denouncing what was the supreme value, Christian charitable value of an American society that still had a lot of the elements of Puritanism present, where philanthropy, which was almost required of every upstanding citizen, was something that was engaged in, oftentimes maybe in bad faith,
00:23:04.160
to preserve appearances.
00:23:08.160
And I think the role thought that philanthropy in his context took the form of material assistance without any concern for the spiritual improvement that or help and assistance that could be brought to bear to the neighbor in need.
00:23:29.160
And maybe Walden is an act of philanthropy in the realm of the spirit rather than in terms of donation of money or providing a material good.
00:23:40.160
I don't know.
00:23:41.160
Well, I think that that is what he implies without going out and saying it that he's doing mankind a better service by waking them up as it were than by providing them with food and clothing.
00:23:53.160
But I just have to say that I don't feel as though I've received a gift of great value.
00:24:00.160
But I think that what's missing in his concept of philanthropy, which he does set up as the sort of straw man, I think, he says early in the book he's talking about, he's apologizing for writing about himself in his own experience.
00:24:19.160
I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else who might do as well.
00:24:24.160
And of course he's trying to be funny, but I also think that there's this underlying belief that you can't be inside anyone else's experience that you can't, that in some sense there's nothing really important that you can learn from an experience that you haven't yourself undergone that I'm reminded in this sense.
00:24:48.160
And maybe I'm making too much out of it of Richard III crying, I am myself alone.
00:24:54.160
And I think that this is, I'm sorry for being so provocative in Therovian, but I think it's an evil tendency to think that you're an island, you can't be touched by any other person.
00:25:09.160
Again, the question is whether that's a premise that could throw commits himself to that we are completely isolated.
00:25:16.160
I would phrase it differently, that clearly we are separated one from the other, that to be an American means to live in a certain measure of separation of citizen from citizen.
00:25:29.160
And that the individual is the basic unit, even political unit of the society.
00:25:34.160
And that the constitution of the United States was designed in order essentially to protect the rights of the individual over and against, not the community per se, but the state and so forth.
00:25:48.160
And that the individual is not an isolated island, but is rather in constant relations with his or her neighbors.
00:26:01.160
But relations that at a certain point reach a limit of communicability where the sort of spiritual experiences that throw communicates to us in language, which is already a public meeting.
00:26:17.160
I think he understood something about the threshold at which something personal does escape the kind of circuitry of communications, whether it's through language or through the newspapers and the media and so forth.
00:26:40.160
And that there was something sacred about that, something to be affirmed, and that it was on the basis of such a self, that the neighbors could come together on a really genuine basis and have something meaningful to say to one another.
00:26:59.160
Well, I can't really quibble with such an articulate and heartfelt defense of the row, although I think I would find it hard to find that in the text myself.
00:27:12.160
I think though that that understanding of one's neighbor is the missing element in his philanthropy, that of course when you are ostentatiously bringing your neighbor, your cast off clothes because it's what everybody does, that that's not really in some sense truly a good action, but that, you know, coming to know your neighbor and understand what he needs and believing yourself to be part of a community with him.
00:27:41.160
Is something that I feel that the row doesn't, doesn't do very well and that we as Americans don't do very well.
00:27:54.160
We are in the courtroom with the row on trial and we're going to be back in just one minute.
00:28:04.160
Can you read a menu, instructions on a medicine bottle, or note from your child's teacher, or a letter from a friend, would you like to help someone who can't?
00:28:13.160
If you're ready to change the life of one individual with reading, writing, or spelling challenges, now is the time to volunteer at your local library.
00:28:21.160
The literacy staff there will match you and guide you.
00:28:24.160
For more information, please call 1-888-740-7323. That number again, 1-888-740-Read.
00:28:39.160
We're here in the studio of KZSU with Catherine Todd talking about the row, and we've really gone to the heart of some of the issues that surround this controversial figure about whether he is a consummate American, or is he a rugged individualist, egoist who wasn't island unto himself, or whether he had a sense of responsibility,
00:29:07.160
if not directly to his community, then to his nation and the destiny that his nation was embarking on.
00:29:16.160
So, Catherine, apart from reading the row in high school, forcibly being coerced to read him, as you said,
00:29:24.160
what other sort of personal considerations do you bring to bear in your reactions to him?
00:29:30.160
Because obviously when one reads a writer like the row or Emerson or these people who challenge us in such a profound way, one brings a lot of personal baggage to the text.
00:29:40.160
Well, it's interesting that you ask that because I have a very good answer.
00:29:46.160
I have this sort of lens through which I read the row, and that lens is the story of my parents' lives who were in the late 1960s and early 1970s, part of this sort of back to the land movement that I see as a very
00:30:10.160
significant element of American culture.
00:30:15.160
I think they appeal to him very directly in that aeronome building your house in the woods and growing your own food.
00:30:22.160
My father actually in the late '60s was living in Boston, and he was an apprentice architect.
00:30:30.160
In the firm where he worked, his last job, the last one before he quit, was to design a multi-story glass-clad office building in the woods near Walden Pond.
00:30:45.160
Nice.
00:30:46.160
Yeah.
00:30:47.160
And he hated it.
00:30:49.160
He hated that his life was being spent in something that he thought of as desecration.
00:30:57.160
And he quit the architecture firm, and he was going to work with his hands until he saved up enough money to go to Mexico and make pottery.
00:31:08.160
And meanwhile, my mother, who was recently divorced with a small child, was also living in Boston.
00:31:17.160
And she had spent her college years in another great Theruvian tradition, that of civil disobedience.
00:31:27.160
She and her first husband both believed that the Vietnam War was very wrong, and that it was their responsibility to do whatever they could to stop it.
00:31:40.160
My mother thought that if she just stood outside of the White House blocking the gate where Hylie Salas' limousine was going to come through, that if she could only stand there long enough and get Lyndon Johnson to talk to her, she could explain to him why the Vietnam War was wrong.
00:32:04.160
And once he heard what she had to say, he would understand that the war was wrong, and that would be an end to it.
00:32:12.160
Cindy She and Mm-hmm.
00:32:14.160
Well, it was just about as effective, I think.
00:32:18.160
But she sort of, I think, came to that belief after a while.
00:32:27.160
I think she became disillusioned with her ability to change the world on a grand scale.
00:32:33.160
Bruce, civil disobedience.
00:32:35.160
Through civil disobedience.
00:32:36.160
Specifically.
00:32:37.160
And she had this young young child.
00:32:43.160
And I think that she came to think that it's either not possible, or it's much too discouraging, one of the two.
00:32:54.160
For us to spend all our energies breaking against the rock of these enormous issues that are beyond our control.
00:33:05.160
And that the way to remake the world as you would wish it to be is on the small scale of a child or a classroom of children or a vegetable garden.
00:33:18.160
And so that was the state that she was in.
00:33:23.160
And when she was driving around Boston one day in her mail truck, her surplus mail truck that she had bought that and post office auction.
00:33:33.160
And it had a rust hole in the side.
00:33:35.160
You know, there was a hole in the metal where it had rested through.
00:33:39.160
And she was looking for some sheet metal to patch the wall of her mail truck.
00:33:44.160
And she stopped at this store that had a sign out front that said earth killed.
00:33:49.160
We sell everything.
00:33:51.160
And she went in looking for sheet metal.
00:33:54.160
And of course they didn't have any sheet metal because it was like a hippie dry goods store that had like hemp, twine, and candles and stuff.
00:34:01.160
But she asked the woman behind the counter anyway, you know, do you have any sheet metal?
00:34:06.160
And it was a slow day and they got to talking and finally the woman said, well, we don't have sheet metal, but we do have salmon.
00:34:13.160
And so my dad came out from the back where he was fixing a kiln as a, you know, preface to, you know, getting enough money to move to Mexico and build pottery.
00:34:25.160
And eventually my parents pooled their mail truck resources.
00:34:30.160
And they ended up driving across the country for a year with my older sister.
00:34:36.160
And they had to find the most beautiful place in the country where they would spend the money that they had to buy a place where they could plant a garden and settle down.
00:34:50.160
That sounds like a Theruvian retreat.
00:34:53.160
In many ways, I would add that.
00:35:01.160
The disobedience theme is one that is full of discouragement and demoralization and the row.
00:35:09.160
If you read that text on civil disobedience, he knows he knew what odds were all up against, you know, as citizens.
00:35:16.160
But he believed that we have, we can't abandon responsibility for the public sphere in whatever impotent the gesture is that, you know, one does it.
00:35:29.160
So I would, it sounds like in the case of your parents, there was a combination of a kind of ethic of civil disobedience combined with the
00:35:39.160
Theruvian sense that life is too precious to devote it entirely to banging your head up against the wall of the world.
00:35:48.160
And that in the meantime, there's a world, there's an earth above all, not a world as much as an earth, you know, full of miracles right there where we live.
00:35:58.160
And it calls out for our attention and our dwelling, our learning how to inhabit it with the sense of affirmation.
00:36:09.160
So it would seem to me that your personal family legacy would predispose you perfectly for this guy.
00:36:16.160
So it's still a bit of an enigma to me where the resistance to him comes from.
00:36:21.160
Well, you haven't heard the conclusion of the story. And I think that so far I agree with you that the story is very Theruvian.
00:36:30.160
What happened at the end of their male truck year though, they were in Santa Cruz visiting with an old friend of theirs and wondering what they were going to do when they read and add in the back of the mother earth news that was explaining that there were, you know,
00:36:50.160
five good acres of hilltop land in Potter Valley, California, and that there was plenty of water and, you know, that it would be sold for such and such a price anyway.
00:37:00.160
They went up to Potter Valley to examine this pot of land and it was up a sort of non-existent dirt road at the top of this dry hill.
00:37:09.160
And my dad asked the man, you know, is there, do you think there's any water up here?
00:37:14.160
He said, oh yeah, you know, you cut down one of these oak trees, you'll get a hundred gallons a day.
00:37:19.160
And they didn't quite believe that. So they were discouraged and they went back down to the bottom of the hill where they were seeing in their male truck in the parking lot of Del's wagon wheel motel.
00:37:34.160
And Del was an inquisitive woman and she, you know, asked them what they were doing in Potter Valley and they said, well, they were looking at this land. And she said, oh yeah, you know, that, that, well, she said it more colorfully than I can really say on the radio, but she explained to them that the man who was selling the land had been trying to pawn it off to a succession of city slickers and that he hadn't had any success yet.
00:38:02.160
But she said that she had some property to sell and she hopped on the running board of the male truck and took them down the road, not to some isolated hilltop parcel, but to the corner lot on the end of Main Street, which was not so small because you have to understand Potter Valley is not a bustling, you know, urban place, but sort of a one, two stop sign kind of town.
00:38:29.160
Anyway, so this, this plot at the end of Main Street had a, you know, an innaker or so on, which you could plant a vegetable garden. And it was, it was actually a set of apartments and they were all occupied so my parents camped out in the male truck for a few months until one of the gentlemen occupying one of the apartments died actually and then they moved in and they spent their time renovating.
00:38:58.160
These apartments and growing a vegetable garden, you know, summers underneath the foundation of the house, throwing it up and afternoons at the river.
00:39:09.160
It still doesn't explain where the resistance come. I mean, I don't see a dissonance between this narrative which is very moving and palpable.
00:39:21.160
I don't see where, where, where there's a disconnect with the, the, the rose experiment. Yeah, so I think that the disconnect comes from the fact that this house is on the corner of Main Street and that there are neighbors there who will walk by when you're painting your house and tell you, you know, you're using the wrong kind of paint and it's going to peel off in a month.
00:39:43.160
And how many times has that happened in Walden where the neighbors go by and they give them advice from remember there's a beautiful chapter on the bean field where he's planting beans and hoe and hoeing and the farmers are going by by on their carriages and each one stops and gives them advice about you have to manure it more you have to use this and that.
00:40:03.160
He was a mile from any from any neighbor but a mile from any neighbors not very far away and it sounds very similar to the circumstances you're describing.
00:40:15.160
I think that that let's see how do I defend this. I think the difference comes in here that eventually my parents found that growing their vegetables and showing up the the foundation of their house got boring.
00:40:36.160
My mom became a school teacher and my dad worked for many years on the irrigation district which involved going around to all the farmers fields and turning the water from you know the valves from the ditch into their fields on and off which he said was a great job because he got to shoot the breeze with every farmer in the valley and they all knew that he was the kind of person that they really had to stay in good with because he controlled the water flow.
00:41:02.160
But power that's right. But I think that I think that the for me the way that I've read Walden as as a surly 25 year old who would fail my citizenship test is as a story of retreat from the world that you have to set yourself apart a mile from any neighbor in order to live alone in the purity of your own thoughts.
00:41:32.160
We have to keep in mind that the rose sojourn in Walden lasted just over two years. He never intended it as a mode of life. He never promoted it as the kind of example that had to be emulated by everyone in order to live. He went there for a limited period of time the way a scientist again sets up an experiment in order to put certain facts to the test.
00:41:58.160
One of the motifs said is so powerful I think in the text is the fact that he knew that he was always going to leave Walden.
00:42:09.160
He was going to go back to Concord which in fact he did and this was a hiatus of two and a half year experiment that I don't think he ever tried to propose was reader as a permanent way of being mode of living.
00:42:27.160
Anyway, we're talking with Catherine Todd about Thoreau we're going to take one little break and we'll be right back.
00:42:35.160
Since 1980, wildlife associates has been caring for abuse, abandoned and other non-releasable wildlife and providing educational programs to assemblies of children and adults throughout Northern California.
00:42:49.160
Over the years their services have expanded to include programs for at-risk teens, personal development workshops for adults, and additional lecture programs for schools from preschool through college.
00:43:00.160
If you would like to find out more, please visit wildlifeassociates.org. That's wildlifeassociates.org.
00:43:09.160
This message has been brought to you by KZSC Stanford 90.1 FM.
00:43:17.160
We're back on air here with Catherine Todd. I'd like to read you just a quote from Walden and this has to do with I think the question of demoralization which is a serious problem in our society.
00:43:36.160
There was a problem also in the 60s which had a moment of flourish and great hopes and the disappointments maybe that ensued after there was a return to the kind of status quo.
00:43:51.160
The demoralization that Thoreau himself was so well aware of on behalf of his own countrymen.
00:43:59.160
Maybe the demoralization that we all feel today given the enormity and the magnitude of the kind of forces that control our lives and control even our democracy.
00:44:15.160
It takes a big effort not to just fall into a sense of hopelessness.
00:44:24.160
But Thoreau probes, I think, something that underlies this sort of disposition.
00:44:33.160
There's a passage there in the first book where he's speaking about loss.
00:44:39.160
He says, "I long ago lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle dove, and I'm still on their trail."
00:44:49.160
No one has been able to figure out what the hound or the bay horse or the turtle dove are supposed to mean.
00:44:56.160
Are they allegories or they symbols?
00:44:59.160
I think they're deliberately indeterminate creatures.
00:45:05.160
Nevertheless, let me continue. Many are the travelers I have spoken to concerning them describing their tracks and what calls they answer to.
00:45:14.160
I have met one or two who have met the hound and the tramp of the horse.
00:45:20.160
And even seen the dove disappear behind a cloud and they seemed as anxious to recover them as if they had lost them themselves.
00:45:29.160
I read that because in that passage it would seem that there was nothing more personal and intimate than what an individual has lost.
00:45:39.160
And these turtle doves, and they seem to be specific to Thoreau himself as an individual.
00:45:45.160
And yet when you speak to your neighbor about these losses, it seems that they recognize.
00:45:52.160
And that we come together in the acknowledgement that all of us insofar as we're mortal human beings and above all even as we're Americans, we come together in this common experience of a loss that sometimes we can't even find words for.
00:46:10.160
And I think that is a genuine basis for founding a community if we can first acknowledge to ourselves that the endless accumulation of material goods or of success and ambitions that all these are in the final analysis going to be very sorry substitutes for a loss for which nothing can really compensate.
00:46:38.160
And maybe the whole course of a country could change if one could bring to bear this sort of awareness.
00:46:49.160
I think that that is one of the passages that make one stop and take breath and stop quarreling with Thoreau for a moment to just be in communion with him.
00:47:00.160
But I think it's interesting too what you point out it's important to note that what he's lost is not something that you can hold in your hand.
00:47:10.160
He speaks Thoreau Walden with contempt for people who are dragging their possessions behind them like a great weight.
00:47:18.160
But what he's talking about that's so terrible to lose is not your house or your livelihood or any certain material thing but is your freedom and your time.
00:47:34.160
These are the things that he safeguards so jealously in his description of his time in the woods.
00:47:41.160
Almost, you know, I think in doing so he loses sight of other things but he definitely feels a horror of losing any more of his time and his freedom to experience the world as he sees fit.
00:48:03.160
We should probably also keep in mind that the book is written in 1854 and I personally believe there's no more important thing about a book than the date it was written.
00:48:13.160
And the history of America or the founding of America and the pre, I mean the colonial period and the Puritan experiment where the Puritans came to America with these hugely wild hyperbolic expectations.
00:48:32.160
Finding the kingdom of God on Earth, of making it, of having the real thing right here and now.
00:48:41.160
And subsequently, again, the disappointments and demoralization for the fact that we're still on the Earth, it's not the kingdom of God on Earth yet.
00:48:54.160
This kind of endless waiting for something that really doesn't happen that there is a loss on a national level that the promise of paradise.
00:49:02.160
I don't know how to define what the expectation was but I think there was no doubt that that America that he belonged to in Concord and Boston and Massachusetts and New England, that newness of New England was supposed to be not new in the sense that it's just a reproduction of the old England.
00:49:23.160
It's supposed to be new in the conversional Christian sense of another order than the old.
00:49:30.160
And so when he says those of you who are said to live in New England, he's saying that we don't live in New England and that that kind of new world in the conversional sense has been lost and maybe we should deal with it.
00:49:49.160
Because perhaps if we can get over that disappointment, we might awaken to the wonder and miracle of the actual nature of the continent itself.
00:50:02.160
And the everyday ordinary miracles that take place as he records them and archives them in Walden, whether it's the squirrels that are feeding on his bean crops or whether it's the wood chuck or the way the ice melts in the springtime and so forth.
00:50:18.160
There is an America out there who's promise actually hasn't been so betrayed.
00:50:25.160
It's just that you have to look for it in the right place, namely in its nature and its elements, the land, seas, skies, forests and so forth.
00:50:35.160
And that's not going to fill this void of loss that comes from perhaps other sources, but it is what we get in return for it if we can just get over our disappointments.
00:50:52.160
And yet this world of wonder is something that for him one can only experience by oneself. You can't, I think for the row, you can't give this world to another person.
00:51:08.160
That is a limitation of the row. I'm not going to debate you on that. He had problems with intimacy.
00:51:18.160
We don't know if he had ever any intimate relations with women.
00:51:25.160
He was oftentimes a very rude guest at the dinner table, never made any concessions to manners and so forth.
00:51:34.160
And there's no doubt that he had a problem there.
00:51:37.160
But I guess the question we're debating is whether that problem, which I would say is a personal psychological problem specific to the individual thorough, whether that carries over into the message and so pervades it that we come away from Walden with the sense that this is a book that is really speaking, it's a self speaking to itself about its own self and its own experiences.
00:52:06.160
And that we're just looking at it from the outside and we can never really get to the inside of it. And therefore in the final analysis it doesn't have any great lessons to teach us as Americans.
00:52:16.160
So I presume that's really the bone of contention here.
00:52:20.160
Well, I think that what is either a loveable or infuriating about the row depending on your point of view is his unwillingness to compromise.
00:52:30.160
That a little freedom is not what he is looking for, that he will have complete freedom or not at all.
00:52:37.160
And that a little understanding and appreciation of the world around him is not what he's looking for.
00:52:44.160
He will be understanding it and with in communion with it all the time or not at all.
00:52:51.160
Yeah, in ancient Greece there were the cynics, the diogenes, the famous cynic and they would live in barrels and they would go around naked and they were there in the public sphere in order to completely shock and flaunt their non-conformism to think.
00:53:13.160
And they served a purpose, they just deliberately situated themselves on the complete outside of things.
00:53:21.160
And we're like gadflies. The row, although I don't believe that he was a modern day kind of diogenes or cynic because I think that he had too many genuinely held beliefs, positive affirmative beliefs to be called a cynic.
00:53:40.160
If anything, I think it was an Epicurean, but nevertheless there are some parallels between a diogenes to the cynic in Athens and the row there in Concord being the gruff aggressive and obnoxious outsider.
00:54:00.160
And the way that you phrase that, the outsider, I think that that's the core of why he can't be a communitarian, why he isn't a writer of community.
00:54:13.160
Because he's looking for perfection, he's looking for the world made anew and community requires compromise of your ideals.
00:54:25.160
Well, perfection is a loaded word that he was searching for perfection.
00:54:33.160
I prefer the other way you put it, which is that he was always looking for this newness.
00:54:39.160
And he found it if we're to believe what he tells us. He found that every morning, in particular every dawn, most beautiful pages involved in my view are the ones where he speaks about that moment right before the dawn.
00:54:54.160
And that there's a kind of sacrality to this kind of in-between moment where it's still dark, but something is being born on the horizon.
00:55:07.160
And the way that the sun comes up, that it's rising is a miracle that happens day in and day out and that it's always new.
00:55:17.160
It's always new. It's a very source of newness. And that his objective for his whole life, he says, was to be awake every dawn in expectation for this diurnal miracle that happened.
00:55:34.160
And he wants to wake his neighbors up, not only intellectually and politically, but he wants them to almost literally be awake for the sunrise so that they can witness it for themselves.
00:55:46.160
That is very beautiful. But as an anti-therovia, I can't let the program end on that note.
00:55:54.160
No, go ahead.
00:55:55.160
In our last 15 minutes, I just wanted to raise one question, which is, can you picture the row being a woman? Can you picture a woman writing this narrative?
00:56:09.160
I can. I really can. Because I think the experiences that he's trying to communicate the deep inner, let's say spiritual experiences, take him into a realm of the soul, which is, I think, not unlike that which Emily Dickinson probed in her palms, although she articulated them in a very different way.
00:56:36.160
I would imagine who can know if I would have to a statistical investigation, but I would imagine that as many women are devoted to thorough as men.
00:56:50.160
Who knows, that may be true, that may not be true, but I certainly have women friends who are totally devoted. In fact, I'll have one of them on this program shortly. I hope Andrea Nightingale, my colleague here in the Department of Classics, is Stanford.
00:57:06.160
Now, I'm perhaps revealing my lack of imagination here, or maybe my latent sexism, but I can't really picture a woman writing Walden.
00:57:20.160
And in fact, when I think of my parents' lives, I think of my father's journey as the rovean, but I don't think of my mothers that way, and I was trying to understand why this was.
00:57:32.160
And I think that it has something to do with the fact that my mother, during this period of time, had a child.
00:57:39.160
And I feel like Thoreau is, in some sense, desperately looking for something to care about, some reason to, you know, some reason to be in the world.
00:57:50.160
And that he finds this reason in himself, in his own thoughts, in his freedom to do as he likes.
00:58:01.160
But I think that as somebody who had responsibility for a child during her Thoreauvian journey, that my mother didn't think in this way,
00:58:17.160
and that her quest was not so much to find a place in the world where she could be herself be unfettered, but to create a world in which her child could lead the life that she would want for her.
00:58:41.160
And I guess that this is one of the things that I just find hard to deal with about Thoreau, is that this focus on the self is, I think he would find it hard to imagine someone with other priorities.
00:59:08.160
That I get angry when he speaks with contempt about people who care about having a roof over their heads of a certain kind.
00:59:19.160
That when you're responsible for another person, that their safety is important to you.
00:59:27.160
And so I guess that this is one of the things that bothers me about Thoreau.
00:59:45.160
Catherine, that's very hard one to answer because I think you're right. I will concede that Thoreau, for all this kind of going to the bottom of what it means to live, to what it means to establish an economy, make a house so much about Walden is about building a house and living in the house.
01:00:08.160
There's hardly any mention of cohabitation and there is hardly any mention really of procreation.
01:00:18.160
And certainly if one is a mother, like you described your mother's case, the experiment in the woods is not going to be that relevant to your experience as a mother or as a woman, let's say.
01:00:36.160
The question still remains that whether there is relevance, not insofar as you're a mother or a woman, but insofar as you are a citizen or maybe a spiritual entity with a spiritual life of your own, that's still an open question.
01:00:56.160
I guess that I'm thinking more and trying to understand what is it about Thoreau that is so inaccessible from the point of view of someone who's responsible for someone else.
01:01:09.160
I guess that for him being free requires taking risks, that if you're to be self-reliant and eat the crops that you plant, you have to deal with the possibility of them not ripening.
01:01:25.160
And that this risk is something that if you're responsible for someone else's life, you want most of all to avoid.
01:01:32.160
And so I guess what I'm trying to understand is if you can have a sort of Thoreau light, you know, freedom without living so close to the edge.
01:01:43.160
Well, this discussion has been fruitful and has convinced me at least that we can continue talking about Thoreau in ways that are as relevant today as they are, they were in his own time.
01:01:57.160
And this is a discussion really to be continued. Catherine Todd, thank you very much.
01:02:02.160
Hello, it's my pleasure.
01:02:03.160
This is KZSU Stanford entitled opinions.
01:02:09.160
[Music]
01:02:33.160
[Music]
01:02:43.160
[Music]
01:02:51.160
[Music]
01:02:59.160
[Music]
01:03:09.160
[Music]
01:03:17.160
[Music]
01:03:27.160
[Music]
01:03:41.160
[Music]