table of contents

03/07/2006

Thomas Harrison on expressionism in the year 1910

Thomas Harrison is Professor of Italian at UCLA, where he has been since 1994. He recieved his B.A. from Sarah Lawrence College and his M.Phil. and Ph.D in Comparative Literature from CUNY. Before joining the faculty of UCLA in 1994 he taught in Italian and comparative literature programs at the University of Pennsylvania, New York […]

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[Music]
00:00:10.000
This is KZSU Stanford.
00:00:14.000
Welcome to entitled opinions.
00:00:16.000
My name is Robert Harrison
00:00:20.000
and we're coming to your live from the Stanford campus.
00:00:24.000
[Music]
00:00:45.000
We had great response to the Jesus show.
00:00:47.000
We did a few weeks back and some angry responses too.
00:00:52.000
Many of you said you learned things about the historical Jesus you never knew before,
00:00:57.000
including the fact that he had several brothers.
00:01:00.000
In fact, Jesus' brother James was the head of the Christian church in Jerusalem after Jesus' death.
00:01:07.000
St. Paul didn't like him very much, but that's not the point.
00:01:12.000
The point is that brothers punctuate cultural history.
00:01:16.000
We have the brothers Grimm, the Marx brothers, the Schlegel brothers,
00:01:21.000
the Konguud brothers, and it so happens that I have a brother too.
00:01:26.000
Thomas Harrison, who like me is a professor of literature,
00:01:30.000
who like me has written a few books and who joins us today on KZSU.
00:01:36.000
So let's hear it for brothers.
00:01:39.000
[Music]
00:01:44.000
[Music]
00:02:05.000
I'll introduce you to my brother Tom in a moment,
00:02:08.000
but first I would like to turn to the Medusa head of reality,
00:02:12.000
as we do from time to time on this program,
00:02:15.000
and say a word about the calamities of 20th century history.
00:02:19.000
In my view, most of those calamities have their source in the biggest disaster
00:02:24.000
to have ever befallen the West.
00:02:27.000
I mean the First World War, in which millions upon millions of men
00:02:32.000
in the bloom of their youth perished in the surreal trenches of Europe.
00:02:38.000
Those trenches were nothing but mass graves, and the soldiers who were lucky enough
00:02:42.000
to get out of them alive left their souls behind in that underworld.
00:02:47.000
An underworld more ghastly than any Hades, or in fair no imagine by poets.
00:02:54.000
I would take the ninth circle of Dante's hell over the trenches of the Great War any day.
00:03:00.000
What was this war all about? What was it thought over?
00:03:04.000
Nothing. Essentially nothing.
00:03:09.000
If the leaders of Europe had gotten together for a few days of rational dialogue,
00:03:13.000
the whole thing could have been prevented.
00:03:17.000
But instead those leaders decided to lose their minds all at once,
00:03:21.000
and all at the same time.
00:03:24.000
They went insane, and for four years Western civilization committed collective suicide.
00:03:32.000
Their died a myriad wrote Ezra Pound and the best among them for an old bitch gone in the teeth
00:03:40.000
for a botched civilization.
00:03:43.000
I don't know if Western civilization was botched or gone in the teeth before the First World War.
00:03:50.000
There's no doubt that it was botched after the war, and because of that war.
00:03:58.000
The causes of the First World War were completely insignificant,
00:04:02.000
yet its consequences were completely catastrophic.
00:04:06.000
The war not only decimated the male population of Europe,
00:04:10.000
it made possible the Bolshevik Revolution, which in turn helped fuel the fires of fascism.
00:04:17.000
And before you know it you had another World War and a Holocaust, followed by a cold war,
00:04:23.000
and mouths and enslavement of China, and so on and so forth.
00:04:28.000
If the leaders could have just gotten together like reasonable adults for a few days in the summer of 1914,
00:04:35.000
we would not, with wild faces, have marched into that remorseless night,
00:04:41.000
or buddle and ree, like blind men battering blind men in a blind ditch.
00:04:48.000
Instead here we are today still living out the aftermath of that fateful war.
00:04:54.000
That's more like it, Harrison, a fateful war.
00:04:59.000
It's naive to think that anything could have forced all the war that the nations of Europe had been building up to for years.
00:05:07.000
The best evidence that it was faded, that it had to take place,
00:05:12.000
is the fact that the horrors of the Great War had already darkened the European soul before they played themselves out on European soil.
00:05:22.000
The realm of spirit and the realm of history, all those separate, are correlative to one another.
00:05:29.000
Poets know this better than anyone, that history is the spoken word of an otherwise silent thought of the soul.
00:05:39.000
Nothing essential happens in history unless it's first expounded in the realm of spirit.
00:05:45.000
This was especially so in the case of the Great War.
00:05:50.000
At least that is the crux of a book my brother Thomas Harrison wrote a few years back entitled,
00:05:55.000
1910, The Emancipation of Disenance.
00:06:00.000
This book looks at what took place in the arts in Europe, in and around the year 1910,
00:06:05.000
one of the most remarkable years in the history of European modernism.
00:06:10.000
There's no way one can read this book and not conclude that the nihilism of the First World War was precedged, summarized, and mourned in the painting,
00:06:20.000
music, poetry, and thought, which are great many artists and thinkers produced in the year 1910.
00:06:27.000
I'm putting it too crudely no doubt, and I'll let my brother revise or nuance the thesis for himself.
00:06:34.000
As I mentioned, he's with me in the studios of KZSU.
00:06:38.000
He's here in the Bay Area on a visit from Los Angeles,
00:06:42.000
where he's been a professor of Italian literature at UCLA for the past ten years or so.
00:06:47.000
Tom, welcome to the program.
00:06:49.000
That's my pleasure.
00:06:51.000
So Tom, you may or may not subscribe to the way I characterize things in my opening remarks,
00:06:56.000
but before we start probing the main thesis of your book 1910,
00:07:01.000
why don't we start with your decision to write a book about a single year?
00:07:05.000
What is it about the year 1910 that's so special?
00:07:09.000
Why do you see it as a year that emancipated dissonance as you put it in the subtitle of your book?
00:07:15.000
And who are the main protagonists of this so-called "inmancipation of dissonance"?
00:07:21.000
Robert, as you know, their books written about all sorts of different years, and
00:07:27.000
I chose 1910 once I realized that something was going on at that particular moment that it did indeed
00:07:33.000
pressage World War I.
00:07:35.000
Feelings of enormous spiritual malays, political malays,
00:07:40.000
Halley's comet passed over in May of 1910 and provoked all sorts of newspaper articles,
00:07:47.000
announcing the end of the world, the end of the world that they've been expecting since the end of the century,
00:07:53.000
the previous century as often happens when a century turns to another.
00:07:58.000
I discovered that Freud announced the Eruppus Complex in 1910,
00:08:04.000
one of his disciples, a psychoanalyst, the Sabina Schpiel-Rine,
00:08:09.000
presented the radical thesis that love is tied to destruction and the death instinct of the thesis that Freud himself took over later.
00:08:17.000
Kandinsky announced the beginning of abstract art, Arnold Schoenberg, from whom the title comes,
00:08:24.000
the emancipation of dissonance wrote the theory of harmony,
00:08:28.000
in which he carefully set forth the idea that we had to restructure the language of music
00:08:34.000
and no longer use those eight tones but liberate the notes on the other notes on the scale
00:08:41.000
that people shied away from except sometimes to create tension.
00:08:45.000
So that's the title of emancipation of dissonance.
00:08:48.000
People were obsessed with madness, the decline of the West, the degeneration of Europe,
00:08:56.000
all this without knowing exactly why,
00:09:00.000
but there was an extraordinary convergence of these concerns in music, painting, poetry,
00:09:08.000
philosophy, psychology, and it seemed to have its best exposition in that year 1910.
00:09:15.000
Yeah, it's remarkable how many actual books or treatises were published in 1910.
00:09:21.000
You mentioned Schoenberg, the theory of harmony.
00:09:23.000
Kandinsky, you mentioned he writes what's it called on spirituality and art.
00:09:28.000
Right.
00:09:29.000
Rainer-Rilke writes Mount Laudet-Brigge.
00:09:33.000
You speak also of Georg Zimmel, the metaphysics of death, and Cardinal Mikkel-Shader,
00:09:41.000
and we'll talk about who finishes a dissertation and actually heels himself, shoots himself
00:09:47.000
on the very day that he finishes dissertation.
00:09:50.000
That's a warning to all graduate students out there.
00:09:52.000
But there's no life after the dissertation sometimes.
00:09:55.000
You mentioned Freud and the Edible Complex, and that sense that there is explosive irrationality
00:10:08.000
under the surface of the bourgeois world as it had been lived out until then,
00:10:15.000
is there a particular obsession with the irrational, and then we'll try to link that to the concept of dissonance?
00:10:22.000
Well, you know, there have been so many revolutionary developments in the 19th century from the industrial revolution onwards.
00:10:28.000
Philosophically, the climate was extremely pessimistic after Schopenhauer,
00:10:34.000
the world is willing representation, proved the point that life is a nasty process.
00:10:39.000
Then there was Darwin who theorized the will to survival and Nietzsche himself, made it the will to power.
00:10:47.000
The idea was philosophically that things were ruled by a blind will,
00:10:52.000
an irrational, animalistic thirst for self-interest and mere getting ahead.
00:11:00.000
This provoked an enormous crisis, and those who wanted to find logic and history, a rational process.
00:11:07.000
Also, those who were concerned with ethics and morality,
00:11:12.000
that Nietzsche had said were not only relative but spurred by almost immoral if not.
00:11:20.000
Well, not immoral, but immoral concerns.
00:11:23.000
I suggested earlier that madness was being studied.
00:11:27.000
Madness in the artist were considered linked and in a sense, heroized,
00:11:34.000
as opposed to the normal bourgeois typical person that appeared rather shallow.
00:11:40.000
So, artists in this period, I'm talking about the late 19th century through to about World War I,
00:11:47.000
saw themselves as visionaries, as prophets, even as saviors of the future.
00:11:53.000
And there was a sense that the future was laid in coming and had to be cataclysmic.
00:11:58.000
I don't think they quite thought it would be as bad as it was with the war,
00:12:03.000
but when you read this period back from the war, it's clear that it's being picked up a few years ahead of time.
00:12:09.000
Your, your country of artists and thinkers come mostly from middle or eastern Europe,
00:12:17.000
the Austro-Hungarian Empire in particular.
00:12:20.000
Is there a reason why the, these fault lines that you've been enumerating seem to be particularly intensified in that part of Europe?
00:12:33.000
No doubt.
00:12:34.000
In fact, as Zep a few weeks ago was talking about the man without qualities and characterized that Austro-Hungarian Empire as a sprawling conglomeration of countless dozens upon dozens of minority groups, ethnic groups that weren't being represented by power,
00:12:52.000
and felt voiceless, um, originated, disenfranchised.
00:12:58.000
There was a large Jewish contingent, many of the figures in my book are Jewish.
00:13:02.000
It was a period that was particularly anti-Semitic, a famous mayor of Vienna, Carl Luger, was famous for, for his anti-Semitism,
00:13:11.000
and also for, for saying, "I decide who's a Jew when he, when he wanted to, to repress somebody."
00:13:17.000
So, uh, that Austro-Hungarian Empire included Northern Italy, borderlands, figures who felt outside the power structure,
00:13:26.000
and certainly outside of the Western European dominant powers.
00:13:30.000
Mm-hmm.
00:13:31.000
Suicide is another phenomenon that's prevalent at that time.
00:13:38.000
I know that I, I, I, I think I remember from looking again at 1910 that, um, this suicide rates were particularly high at the highest point that they had been in the century in this period.
00:13:49.000
Yeah, they had been rising from around 1903 and reached an absolute peak in 1910.
00:13:56.000
As though, of course, most of these suicides were young men.
00:13:59.000
As though they sense that they were going to be conscripted four years later and meet a, a horrifying experience that they weren't prepared for.
00:14:06.000
So, yeah, suicide was, was predominantly was, uh, mental illness, which may have been there before, not, not, recognize because psychology was getting more sensitive to it.
00:14:18.000
But, yeah, suicide was a huge thing. So big that Freud himself with a psychoanalytic society called the meeting, I recall it almost an emergency meeting in 1910 to try to get to the cause of suicide among students.
00:14:32.000
There's, uh, you quote, uh, is it Henry Adams that you quote in your book about, uh, the year 1910? I don't have it underhand. Let's see where it's.
00:14:42.000
I have, I've, I've got it here on the ground.
00:14:44.000
You got it.
00:14:45.000
That's a great quote. Let's, uh, Henry Adams for the United States, the historian and political theorist, or quote him, February of 1910.
00:14:54.000
Every reader of the French and German newspapers knows that not a day passes without producing some uneasy discussion of social decrepituals, falling off of the birth rate, decline of rural population, lowering of army standards, multiplication of suicides, increase of insanity, or idiocy, cancer, tuberculosis,
00:15:14.000
signs of nervous exhaustion and feebled in vitality, habits of alcoholism and drugs, failure of hindsight, and so on without end.
00:15:25.000
So this is a kind of symptomology. And in 1910, your book, you want to, uh, you, you, you, you set out to show how the arts gave expression in very dramatic forms.
00:15:37.000
Primarily, I guess expression is you would, would it be fair to say that the expressionism as a kind of umbrella, genre under which a lot of the poets and musicians and painters that you deal with that they fall into or what we would understand as expressionism?
00:15:55.000
Exactly. It's a, it's a term that used to be limited to the visual arts and primarily, primarily still is.
00:16:02.000
It's not so much applied to, uh, to music and thinking, but it seemed to me that what was going on in the visual arts could explain also the way people thought and, uh, the, the music too that Schoenberg, this atonal new liberation from tonality.
00:16:21.000
Yeah, we could, what exactly did Schoenberg mean by emancipation of dissonance in the musical sphere and then maybe we can talk about the painting and poetry?
00:16:29.000
Well, modern music had been becoming increasingly, um, dissonant that is, they would use tones outside of the normal eight that you used either in a major and a minor chord in order to create tension.
00:16:45.000
And this in Screeaben and W.C. particularly had reached a, a point at which something else was called for and Schoenberg asked himself, why do we have to resolve these dissonant notes of these things where it goes out of two.
00:16:58.000
Why do we have to come back to the reassuring tonality? Why not liberate all the tones in the scale and, and even get free from the center? And I think that that's kind of symbolic of the liberation of that which has been repressed until now.
00:17:17.000
If you want to think of them as minority figures politically as well, the, a free, um, not a free for all, but music liberated from the, the key structure and utilization of all its 12 resources.
00:17:33.000
That's what I think he was working towards and most people know that Schoenberg invented later in the 20s, the basis for 20th century musical practice, which is the 12th tone row or serial composition where he took all two
00:17:46.900
12 tones of the scale and aside, then I signed them in order so you would use all 12 which was absolutely radical.
00:17:54.900
In 1910 starts around 1909. He starts thinking of dissonance in positive terms as though one, it's a type of anti authoritarian approach to the, to the convention and two.
00:18:10.400
He felt that deformation was necessary for a new type of form. So what he was really interested in was a linguistic revolution in, in music, a new language because the old language was not doing justice to individualities and to, to what the I wanted to express.
00:18:30.400
That's why I see him as an expressionist, of course, he was tied to them anyway. He was included in Vasily Kandinsky's blue writer and theology, there were friends and agreed upon a whole lot of things.
00:18:43.400
Specialism generally means the, the thrust for the I for the subject for the individual self to to shout out or scream out its concerns that are not being heard by the conventional languages of the time.
00:18:59.400
Schoenberg was first and foremost a composer but he was also very much a very philosopher and I think theory of harmony which he was published in 1911 I guess he was writing in 1910.
00:19:12.400
Also gives a whole theory of the soul doesn't it?
00:19:16.400
Well he doesn't go into that as much as his friend Kandinsky does, who after he attends a concert by Schoenberg at the beginning of 1911 and contact him finds out that
00:19:28.400
what Schoenberg doing in music is very much what he aspires to do in painting, namely to revolutionize the language and get over objective representation.
00:19:38.400
After the impressionist had sort of dissolved external reality and rarefied it, Kandinsky sees a painting actually by Monet called the haystack and he doesn't recognize it as a haystack.
00:19:54.400
He sees it as a beautiful painting but he can't recognize what the object is and that's where dawns on him that painting should free itself from the external world that it's always felt obliged to represent.
00:20:07.400
The best he calls it, the rest.
00:20:09.400
The external thing he says is precisely what's forbidden to us painters and so he develops the manifesto, spirituality and art requires that you give voice to the
00:20:24.160
the soul to the to the irrational self through tone colors and and that painting has the freedom he felt that Schoenberg's polytonal or atonal music hat.
00:20:39.160
Is there something in the title spirituality and art that is implicitly polemical against any concert of materialism there on Kandinsky?
00:20:48.160
Absolutely, in fact the the polemic with materialism is seen by Kandinsky as a cosmic battle and you know no doubt that many of these artists embraced World War 1 as a cathartic.
00:21:03.160
Let's have it out.
00:21:04.160
Kandinsky felt that materialism had governed the 18th and 19th century money,
00:21:11.160
mongering industrial production capitalism and whatnot and felt that these two great forces were fighting and where he stood was very clear as a matter of fact if you give me just one second, I'd like to quote you, a passenger to from him on this.
00:21:31.160
From spirituality and art.
00:21:33.160
Well, let me let me quote this one because in the first party talks about what the form of his painting is and what painting should be in a second is what the content is.
00:21:48.160
So the the form he says cold calculation patches leaping at random mathematically exact construction silent screaming figures fanfares of color great calm heavy
00:22:02.160
disintegrating surfaces that's the form his painting will take and then he defines its content suffering searching tormented souls with a deep rift caused by the collision of the spiritual with the material.
00:22:18.160
The living element of living and dead nature constellation in the appearance of the world and so on speaking of the hidden by means of the hidden that hidden by the way is is the inner self to soul that which.
00:22:31.160
Freud in a entirely different language was calling the unconscious the the dark true motivators of life and.
00:22:41.160
Art of this period wanted to give voice to that expression as a means precisely pushing it out from the inside.
00:22:49.160
There's a passage. I have the book here on ninety five where you write that what now seems to be the more bid thinking of the early 20th century because we have been talking about.
00:23:00.160
Theories and practices that some people might consider more never the list.
00:23:05.160
What now seems to be the more but thinking of the early 20th century was larger the consequence of an unwillingness to acquiesce in the growing materialistic convention convention.
00:23:15.160
I'm sorry that all spiritual questions are foreclosed by the self terminating flow of historical experience.
00:23:23.160
And be the human mind is accordingly well advised to limit its attention.
00:23:28.160
To the furtherance of its pleasures and chores.
00:23:31.160
I think that characterizes pretty well the kind of steam on our own air now.
00:23:36.160
We're living in now which might explain why a lot of people might have problems.
00:23:45.160
Appreciating in any depth the kind of expression is aesthetics that you deal with.
00:23:52.160
But let me go on the morbidity is also the consequence of confronting what so many doctrines of happiness, rights and empowerment tend to exclude from their moralizing pictures.
00:24:01.160
The irrationality of physical and psychological suffering, the inner radical ability of human petiteness and rivalry, the instability of destiny and the intellectual understanding of it.
00:24:13.160
So where these artists heroically trying to delve into those very things that subsequently would be excluded from consideration.
00:24:25.160
These artists were perhaps the most ethically committed and philosophically committed generation of artists since the romantics.
00:24:36.160
They could not accept the irrationality of external contingent phenomena, of inner needs.
00:24:47.160
And they felt they needed to put order into things that at least to understand this order that the official stories were not telling.
00:24:55.160
This led them, as I say to maybe exaggerate the case for the amount of suffering, the morbidity, the poverty, although it's hard to say that such things could be exaggerated.
00:25:08.160
They're truly disturbed by them. And they developed, as I was saying, metaphysics of negativity.
00:25:16.160
One of my chapters called the Deficiency of Being. Being itself is considered a rotten setup.
00:25:23.160
I'd like to read you, for instance, Lukachu was famous for being a Marxist philosopher later.
00:25:30.160
When he was young in 1910, he was about 22, 23 years old and he wrote this beautiful book called "Soul and Form".
00:25:36.160
Lukachu was a Hungarian. Lukachu was from Hungary, but he wrote in German, and the thesis of "Soul and Form" is that "Soul has a hard time taking form and forms, de-forms the soul".
00:25:49.160
And I want to read you what he says about life because it turns up in other philosophers, Zimmold, the sociologist, and so on. Listen to this.
00:25:57.160
"Life is an anarchy of light and dark. Nothing is ever completely fulfilled in life. Nothing ever quite ends.
00:26:05.160
New and confusing voices always mingle with a course of those that have been heard before. Everything flows, everything merges into another thing, and the mixture is uncontrolled and impure. Everything is destroyed, smashed, nothing of her flowers into real life."
00:26:22.160
This kind of statement, you can find it in all sorts of thinkers of the time.
00:26:29.160
And if you have a second, I want to read you a line by Zimmold from the metaphysics of death.
00:26:37.160
"Zimmold being a German".
00:26:39.160
Gorgzimo was a philosopher in Berlin, with whom Lukachu and many other people studied, probably even high-digger for all I know. Everyone passed under his wing.
00:26:50.160
And Zimmold says, "All our gain and pleasure, work in peace, and all our other modes of relation, are an instinctive or conscious flight from death. The life we employ to draw nearer to death, we employ to flee it."
00:27:06.160
So he has this nice image. We are like men on a ship who walk in a direction opposite to the one in which it is going.
00:27:12.160
While they proceed to the south, the deck on which they do so is carried to the north with them on board.
00:27:19.160
So this negative metaphysics we no longer share today, and as I was saying in that passage you quoted, we do as a matter of fact everything we do to ignore it and forget about it, put it under the rug.
00:27:37.160
Yeah, repress it again.
00:27:40.160
Well, they certainly, these artists certainly exasperated the contradictions, maybe without resolving them.
00:27:50.160
And we'll have occasion to speak about the afterward to your book where you claim that this was a moment that really could not have been sustained for all that long because it was a particular problematic of negativity and nihilism that
00:28:06.160
did not have a foundation on which you could construct something more enduring and positive into the future.
00:28:14.160
But definitely, I think if we're talking about the mood of the time, it's really quite uncanny the way it seems to pressage.
00:28:22.160
A collective catastrophe like the First World War which seems to play out all the worst nightmares that the expression has had been obsessed by during this period.
00:28:35.160
Well, let's try to touch on a few of the other figures that you deal with.
00:28:42.160
There's a number of poets.
00:28:44.160
There's Rainer Rilke, Georg Trakel, Dino Campana.
00:28:49.160
What did I say a word about Rilke's notebooks of Mount Loryte Brigger which was also published in 1910?
00:28:56.160
Well, Mount is a very interesting prose work about a figure I think he's Danish originally who is in Paris and it starts with his vision of hospitals, sickness, suffering.
00:29:16.160
And as his notebooks proceed, the fictitious course, we find him identifying himself more and more with with the homeless who are much more numerous than he would have imagined from his provincial place of origin, the homeless, the beggars.
00:29:34.160
And it's an exercise in what he needs to learn to be an artist and what his art should really be addressing itself to.
00:29:44.160
And it has this beautiful sort of culmination in the principle as he concludes that he has to be the heavy heart of all that is indistinguishable.
00:29:55.160
I think we have to understand the word indistinguishable as that which cannot be seen clearly, that which is not seen at all, that which doesn't have a form that does it justice.
00:30:09.160
And the heavy heart is the expressed suffering of these poets and musicians and painters at the time who want to call it to attention.
00:30:22.160
The artists are always sometimes pitilessly honest about what's going on.
00:30:29.160
So, Realke does that in prose and then he after the war like Schoenberg and others finds a new footing. But at this point it's really desired to lay it all out.
00:30:44.160
I'm tempted to say it's very consonant with the dissonance of the time with the other artists.
00:30:52.160
One of my other favorite poets, Gewerte Trackel, is also writing, he'll die also shortly during suicide.
00:31:03.160
By suicide, I think in 1917, but you talk about someone who had a very dark vision of human existence, that's definitely Gewerte Trackel.
00:31:18.160
He was a very bleak figure and interesting in taking the guilt upon himself, maybe more directly than some of the others that I study.
00:31:29.160
The idea that one is responsible for all the suffering and pain in the world.
00:31:36.160
He also links up with another theme of my book which is sexuality.
00:31:42.160
Sexuality is as a miracle on the one hand, but as something very dark and questionable on the other.
00:31:50.160
Like Schoenberg, like Sheila, the painter.
00:31:53.160
And Trackel was reputed to have had an incestuous relationship with his sister from which he never could recover in his moral conscience.
00:32:02.160
He was also a drug taker, he was a chemist and did a lot of drugs, and had a horrible experience in the war as the physician for the suffering soldiers.
00:32:14.160
And eventually hanged himself from a tree, but before he did, he wrote some of the most beautiful poetry of the beginning of the century.
00:32:23.160
Maybe we can hear one.
00:32:24.160
If I may add also, Wittgenstein is a character, the philosopher comes into this book.
00:32:29.160
We haven't spoken of him, but Wittgenstein was very, very wealthy, and he gave away all of his money to Trackel and real care, without knowing them at all.
00:32:38.160
But he read him in a journal and said, "Of Trackel, he says, 'I don't understand it, but it has a tone of genius.'
00:32:44.160
And he gave away his entire family fortune to these two poets because he liked what they were saying."
00:32:50.160
You prefer Trackel to the real care, I think.
00:32:53.160
Yeah, and I think so too.
00:32:55.160
Trackel is much more dramatic.
00:33:00.160
Let's hear, if we could hear his voice, as a short verse or two, Trackel, that would be great.
00:33:07.160
All right, I'll read it to you in English though.
00:33:09.160
The poem is called "Untergung," and that is a loaded word.
00:33:13.160
It means decline, but it means destruction going under.
00:33:17.160
Excuse me for interrupting before we go with the poem.
00:33:21.160
The decline of the West is another big, huge motif with the spangler book.
00:33:28.160
Yeah.
00:33:29.160
And then maybe we can also talk about sex and character about the vineyard.
00:33:35.160
Yeah.
00:33:36.160
Let's bring up a spangler right after.
00:33:38.160
So here's the poem, it's just about 12 lines or so.
00:33:43.160
Above the white pond, the wild birds have flown away.
00:33:48.160
And I see wind blows from our stars at evening.
00:33:52.160
Above our graves, the shattered brow of night is bowed.
00:33:58.160
We rock beneath the oak trees in a silver skiff.
00:34:03.160
The white walls of the city ring forever.
00:34:07.160
Beneath thorn arches.
00:34:09.160
Oh, my brother, we climb blind hands toward midnight.
00:34:16.160
So you can see the dark imagery, the night imagery, midnight is very ponderous.
00:34:24.160
But you also have the light imagery, the white pond, the wild birds have flown away.
00:34:30.160
Of course, they're gone.
00:34:32.160
And now what blows is a nice wind from the stars at evening.
00:34:35.160
So this is kind of cosmic anxiety.
00:34:38.160
One of the pictorial representations I have of this just proceeds in 1910 is the screen by Edvad Munk.
00:34:45.160
Of the eye who feels that the cosmos is not only terribly cold, but malign.
00:34:50.160
Some malignancies is at work.
00:34:53.160
And above our graves, as though we have an entered them, but we're already dead,
00:34:58.160
the shattered brow of night is bowed.
00:35:01.160
So the god, if you will, is a negative one.
00:35:06.160
And we're on this silver boat beneath the oak trees, the city walls are white and so on.
00:35:12.160
Very beautiful but haunted palm, typical of many, many others of his.
00:35:19.160
Yeah, I think that when you use the word guilt in his regard,
00:35:22.160
I mean it applies perfectly of trackle as a whole,
00:35:25.160
but really to so many of the others we're talking about.
00:35:29.160
So how about the decline of the west and also a little bit about vinegar in the sex and character?
00:35:37.160
Because we were speaking earlier about the darkness of sexuality for trackle,
00:35:42.160
she lived many of the others actually.
00:35:45.160
Where sexuality now is fused with guilt if you want to look at it.
00:35:50.160
Not in the conventional religious sense, but that there's something about
00:35:54.160
sexuality that is fallen, linked to all that kind of matter that
00:36:02.160
can maybe was trying to get away with through his concept of spirituality.
00:36:07.160
What is this book, Sex and Character?
00:36:11.160
When did that come out?
00:36:13.160
And what's the thesis of that book?
00:36:15.160
Well, Sex and Characters are kind of a study in 1910 expressionism because the man of rights it
00:36:23.160
commits suicide three or four months after comes out and it was one of the biggest best sellers throughout Europe.
00:36:30.160
I think it went through 12 to 20 editions before he committed suicide.
00:36:35.160
He was a Jewish man from Vienna and was in contact with Freud,
00:36:41.160
whose theories he felt had actually been stolen from him, Vine and Gher.
00:36:47.160
The thesis is systematic but fairly simple.
00:36:52.160
One, men are capable of moral behavior, women are not.
00:36:59.160
Therefore, sex does determine character, but it doesn't stop there because only the
00:37:05.160
area character is capable of true goodness, morality, genius, intellectual discoveries.
00:37:13.160
Whereas Jews and others were also born congenitally incapable of achieving those heights.
00:37:20.160
Of course, this comes from a young Jewish man and he may even have been gay.
00:37:28.160
So the image of masculinity that he was presenting didn't conform to him any more than the racial discourse.
00:37:36.160
But many people were taken by this book even if they were themselves Jewish or women.
00:37:42.160
I think Wittgenstein was very influenced by it.
00:37:47.160
So many others, sometimes I wonder to what extent the suicides of 1910 to 1914 were emulating his.
00:37:55.160
As early in the romantic days, people would emulate the suicide of Vesta, Gerta's great romantic hero who killed himself out of noble choice.
00:38:04.160
Refusing a life that was not worth living.
00:38:07.160
So he establishes that and it's a sort of bleak prospect if you're not.
00:38:11.160
If you don't have what it takes and you're born with it.
00:38:15.160
Then, the spangler thing grows out of a number of studies that's at the end of the 19th century denouncing forms of degeneration.
00:38:24.160
We even had an Italy Lombroso who used to study criminals and the way their facial brain structure was a sign that they were destined to.
00:38:37.160
Being anti-nomion, cultural events in Europe, things like symbolism, aestheticism were considered a feat degenerate development by a guy called Max Nordau.
00:38:51.160
He wrote a book called Degeneration in the 90s.
00:38:53.160
I didn't excuse me for interrupting, but didn't the Nazis have famous exhibition on degenerate art in which a number of the characters that you deal with were on exhibit?
00:39:03.160
Well, of course, and that's why the line of this way of thinking goes straight through the Hitler.
00:39:09.160
The degenerate art exhibit was in 36 or 37, and they had not only jazz, music and Kurt Vile and Schoenberg there,
00:39:19.160
but they would hang paintings of Kandinsky upside down and they'd have captions next to you, see?
00:39:24.160
It doesn't matter what side you look at, it still doesn't make any sense.
00:39:28.160
So the degeneracy was almost a sign of pride in some of the artists I deal with, and in some of Hitler's antagonists.
00:39:37.160
Namely, what you people are calling degenerate are visionary types who don't yet have a language in which to express themselves coherently.
00:39:50.160
And the language that you are asking them to conform to is just a watered down empty convention that doesn't say anything.
00:40:01.160
So whichever way you looked at it, whether from the right or the left, things at this time in Europe were not very promising.
00:40:12.160
And my figures were committed to discovering a different type of language that might make better sense of madness and the sexual impulse, self-interest and the imagination.
00:40:27.160
That's why they are artists so shrill and tortured.
00:40:35.160
Well, look who's walked into the studio, hold on a second here. Can we get Alex ahead set? Let's see if we can get him on air a minute, hold on.
00:40:43.160
This is my nephew Alex, he's eight years old. Alex, I've talked about you on this show before when I was talking about birds.
00:40:52.160
I said that you kept asking me what my favorite bird is. Now that you're here, let's see if you're miked up. What's your favorite bird?
00:41:00.160
Well, I like falcons and hawks and I like eagles. I like birds of prey.
00:41:08.160
I like some parrots and macawsing. I like owls and I like lots of birds.
00:41:17.160
How good. Hey, I know that you read a lot of Harry Potter books. You read them all.
00:41:22.160
Yeah. Do you have a favorite one?
00:41:24.160
Well, no, but I like, I don't like number one. I'd say number two would be about my third favorite, maybe fourth.
00:41:36.160
Yeah. I'd say maybe six or fifth would be my favorite, one of those two.
00:41:45.160
All right, well, we're going to have to watch some of those movies together next time.
00:41:49.160
Hey, remember, last year I taught you a poem that you knew by heart. Do you still remember that poem?
00:41:56.160
Yeah. Let's go.
00:41:58.160
After all, the jacks are in their boxes and the clowns have all gone to bed.
00:42:04.160
You can hear happiness staggering down the street. Footprints, dressed in red and the wind cries Mary.
00:42:13.160
Then it goes the broom, girly sweeps up the broken pieces of yesterday's life.
00:42:19.160
Somewhere a queen is weeping and somewhere a king has no life and the wind cries Mary.
00:42:30.160
Then it goes the traffic light turns blue tomorrow and shines its emptiness down on my bed.
00:42:38.160
And the wind screams Mary. Will the wind ever remember the names it has born in the past?
00:42:46.160
With its crutch, its old age and its wisdom, know this will be the last.
00:42:51.160
That's beautiful. You know where that comes from, don't you? Yeah.
00:42:59.160
This is for you Alex, thanks for coming on.
00:43:05.160
After all the jacks are in their boxes and the clowns have all gone to bed.
00:43:20.160
You can hear happiness staggering down the street.
00:43:28.160
Well, here we're back on air. That was a kind of welcome little relief from the ponderous themes that we've been pursuing here in the last few minutes.
00:43:55.160
Thanks to Alex again for providing a little bit of fresh inness and vitality.
00:44:00.160
Exactly. I think degenerate there yet.
00:44:04.160
But we do have to resume a little bit because there's many figures that we haven't talked about.
00:44:09.160
I want to get in Cardinal Michael Stader because he's one of the main protagonists of your book.
00:44:16.160
Can you tell our listeners who was this guy, Michael Stader?
00:44:20.160
What was his career all about and how did it end?
00:44:25.160
Michael Stader was little known until some 20 years ago when his work started to be published by an important press in Italy.
00:44:34.160
He was an Italian.
00:44:35.160
He was an Italian who lived in Austro-Hungarian Empire because that part near TTS was still Austro-Hungarian until after the war 1918.
00:44:44.160
He was from an ethnic point of view.
00:44:48.160
I want to say he was exemplary for the other figures in my book because he was Italian-speaking German-educated by Jewish family.
00:44:58.160
So he had no fixed identity and that was an issue for him as it was for so many others.
00:45:04.160
He went to Florence to do a dissertation in philosophy and he decided to do it on Aristotle and Plato.
00:45:11.160
He called it Persuasion and rhetoric.
00:45:14.160
The thesis of the dissertation was quite simple.
00:45:17.160
That rhetoric gets in the way of our own persuasion.
00:45:24.160
That is, we can't know what we want and what we want to say because we're forced to use a language that isn't ours to begin with.
00:45:31.160
That argument took him into analysis of life as also getting in the way of what we want.
00:45:38.160
In fact, the first sentence of his book, I believe, is, I know that I want and that I do not have what I want.
00:45:48.160
That his desire is what we start with, but we also know that we don't have it because the desire is always a desire for what you don't have yet.
00:46:00.160
It's absolutely fascinating thesis, very short, written in an extraordinarily expressionist style.
00:46:09.160
He struggled on it for a year and then once he completed it, in fact, I've seen the manuscript.
00:46:15.160
It's stained with blood.
00:46:17.160
He shot himself because in that thesis he proved that life could not be lived the way an authentic person would demand it to be lived.
00:46:27.160
Not only did he do that, but he was also a polymath. He was a painter, very good painter, and a poet.
00:46:34.160
He was an extraordinary athlete, good looking guy.
00:46:37.160
So he seemed to have all the qualities, but all of them led him to negative conclusions.
00:46:45.160
So he's, wait, I understand that he shot himself not once, but twice because the first shot didn't kill him.
00:46:51.160
Yeah, that's how determined he was to do it.
00:46:54.160
So is that the logical, what am I trying to say?
00:46:59.160
A thesis is all about proving something, you know, marshalling evidence and making a cogent argument on behalf of a thesis.
00:47:09.160
So his suicide would, I guess, be the crowning evidence that he brings to bear.
00:47:15.160
Yeah, well, it was the proof of the truth of his thesis.
00:47:18.160
He put his money where his mouth was. He had proved that life was degenerate and had to be rejected.
00:47:24.160
So it was a heroic suicide.
00:47:27.160
You know, he comes from Godetia near the Estee in that region.
00:47:31.160
That's a very fascinating part of the world, certainly a Italy.
00:47:37.160
And in fact, a lot of your protagonists come from the margins, literally speaking, and not really from the big metropolitan centers.
00:47:46.160
Of course, there's a lot from Vienna and so forth, but you've been to go to East
00:47:48.160
Eachemian, it's an extraordinary place.
00:47:52.160
Yeah, it truly is. As a matter of fact, it had a huge Jewish community.
00:47:56.160
It was probably one of the biggest concentrations of Jewish Italians, of which there were only 10 left, I think, after 1945.
00:48:04.160
But more interesting than that, in a sense, politically speaking at least, is that after the Second World War,
00:48:11.160
as though the first wasn't bad enough, the city of Gaurice had to be divided between the Italians and the Yugoslavs.
00:48:20.160
And so it was exactly like Berlin, a divided city, with Italians on one side, and the Slavs on the other.
00:48:28.160
Is there a wall there?
00:48:30.160
Well, there's not a wall, you know, a physical wall is in Berlin, but there are gates, and now to go from one side, the other you still crossing countries.
00:48:39.160
But that's how borderland it was. It had to be.
00:48:43.160
The Slovenia there too.
00:48:45.160
Well, yeah, that's what it was, ex-ugoslavia, and then now it's Slovenia.
00:48:50.160
Right.
00:48:51.160
But it remained divided ever since. In fact, the Mical Stateers grave is on the Slovenian side.
00:48:55.160
You can't just go see it.
00:48:57.160
So, yeah, they also suffered from this being in the margins and not being the representative group that was in power.
00:49:06.160
And in fact, in other parts of Europe, let's say the more what we would call the more big capitals, Paris, maybe London, the arts of this period were not exactly converging with this kind of high nihilistic expressionism that you deal with.
00:49:28.160
I mean, when you say that year 1910, a lot of people will think of Virginia Woolf, who has a famous sentence that human character changed in the year 1910.
00:49:37.160
That whole bloom is very crowd.
00:49:39.160
But I think that they were maybe up to something a little different there, huh?
00:49:44.160
Oh, yeah, they didn't have the highernessness by means of which art should be solving the world's problems.
00:49:52.160
And so they were proceeding quite happily through the Virginia Woolf says that human character changes and that art has to look to the interior.
00:50:01.160
It has to quit representing the outside world and what's happening.
00:50:04.160
It has to represent the interior soul or subjectivity of its protagonist.
00:50:08.160
So, there's something comparable going on, but there's not this pathos and there's not the sense of the self as an infinite mystery and even a dark spot that will never be able to come to language because it's not the same thing.
00:50:16.160
So, I mean, Paris was a wonderful place to live in London. These were hopping places. My characters are on the margins and feel left behind by Paris in London.
00:50:40.160
And, okay, there's also futurism at this moment. I mean, Maddy Nett, he writes a famous manifesto in 1910 for futurism.
00:50:51.160
But I think the futurist triumphalistic rhetoric was quite antithetical to the expressions you're dealing with, would you say?
00:51:02.160
was future oriented they didn't have any problem with the War, either. Technology, all the things that
00:51:07.600
vilified the Soul according to my central European characters that repressed and stifled
00:51:12.640
individuality, technology, industry speed, forward, forward. That was that was being applauded by
00:51:22.280
Māṇeti in Paris and through the War that didn't change for him, whereas the others felt not
00:51:30.400
only was that a sort of soulless process, but humanism would be its casualty.
00:51:37.400
Well, I think even though we've only scratched the surface of all the figures and issues that
00:51:43.680
you go into, it's clear enough that this sentence you have in your introduction seems to be
00:51:50.640
born out through what we've said so far. In 1910, as the spiritual prefiguration of an
00:51:56.320
unspeakably tragic fatality, heard in the tones of the audacious and the anguished, the deviant
00:52:02.320
and the desperate, in the art of a youth grown precautiously old, awaiting a war it had long
00:52:09.200
suffered in spirit. Right, the shadow of the future cast over the present. And you know, the best
00:52:18.080
artist aside from Kandinsky, there are a number of painters here. Kokoshka. Kokoshka and Shele, I would
00:52:25.040
say are fundamental in the book, and both of them, along with other German and Austrian
00:52:31.520
expressionists, were obsessed with self-portraits, nude self-portraits, grimacing, bleeding.
00:52:38.800
Again, the artist as a martyr figure and possibly also as savior, the one that's attuned to what
00:52:49.440
their others are ignoring or repressing. You say at the end of your study in the afterward that
00:53:00.480
expressionism, as a study described, it had a short run, and that there were internal reasons why
00:53:06.960
the theoretical dynamics of 1910 were not destined to develop. I'm continuing to quote here,
00:53:14.400
"Nothing much could be built upon them, they were not useful to the social political and economic
00:53:19.040
needs of post-war countries, Michael Stader's persuasion and Boobers direction," we haven't
00:53:24.800
talked about Boobers, but offered no concrete directives for action, no functional models or systems,
00:53:29.840
no idioms for practical behavior. They were utopian reflections on the homeless experience of a
00:53:34.320
here and now. So as you see, this was a moment, and it was a particularly dark mood in Europe,
00:53:44.720
and that these artists gave expression to that schtimmung, which then history went on to give its own
00:53:51.520
sort of explosive form to. Is there something that we can still learn from these figures a hundred
00:54:02.960
years later? The kind of art they produced, I know we're speaking about a whole bunch of different
00:54:09.200
characters here, but is there something about the kind of art they produce that still can provide
00:54:14.400
some sort of aesthetic pleasure would be the wrong word, but some sort of aesthetic insight,
00:54:25.440
or are we dealing here with something that happened in history? And if we have a curiosity about the
00:54:35.920
history of European modernism, clearly these people have their place there, but is there something
00:54:43.600
retrievable? Is there something desirable maybe about the attempt to retrieve their aesthetics, their
00:54:50.160
metaphysics, and their cries of anguish? Well, I don't want to short change these figures,
00:54:59.200
don't forget that painting in the 20th century really took off from Kandinsky's non-objective
00:55:06.320
art, his abstract painting, and the more properly expressed in his painters of 1910 and those years
00:55:13.760
have been returned to over and over through movements of neo-expressionism. These were
00:55:19.680
the people who before the war sort of did revolutionize the different languages of art in music and
00:55:27.440
in painting just to take two of them, and so they had enormous influence and then very salutary
00:55:33.600
effect this idea that art has to think about what its own possibility is. So for that point of
00:55:40.880
view they've remained in and been seminal figures in development of art. In other respects, of
00:55:46.480
course, the darkness of their vision didn't turn a lot of people on, and after World War I
00:55:54.400
had to get on to the reconstruction of Europe, and so one had to forcibly leave that stuff behind,
00:56:01.840
but don't forget that every time you leave it behind it comes back, and so it did come back in
00:56:06.000
World War II, and human nature does not change despite the fact that we think we're getting better
00:56:12.640
and more rational and whatnot. So the depths of the soul that they probed are the same depths
00:56:19.520
that people try to keep hidden, cyclically over and over and over. So while it's not very pleasurable,
00:56:28.160
not much fun maybe to listen to Schoenberg's A. Tonal Music, it's a reminder really of the beast
00:56:36.720
that we have within us that'll stick its head up the minute it thinks you can get away with it.
00:56:41.600
Beautiful. Well, we've been speaking to my brother Thomas Harrison here on entitled "Epinions,
00:56:47.680
I'm Robert Harrison," and I want to thank my brother for coming into the studios here from UCLA
00:56:56.160
where he teaches in the Department of Italian. I want to remind our listeners that we have a web page
00:57:02.240
for this program. You have to log on to the home page of the Stanford French and Italian
00:57:08.160
department click on entitled "Epinions," and you can listen to past shows and archive
00:57:12.160
that we've archived there and post comments on our web page if you feel so inclined. I want to
00:57:18.240
thank David Lummis for his technical support as usual. So Tom, it's been fascinating discussion.
00:57:26.400
I you suggested that we end with a piece of music from one of these
00:57:32.320
expressions, if I may say so, or emancipators of dissonance. Can you tell us what we're going to
00:57:40.080
hear? It's just a one-minute long, but what is it that we're going to leave our listeners with?
00:57:45.200
Well, this is a very short composition by a student of Schoenberg that most people enjoy
00:57:51.360
listening to more than to do Schoenberg, Antoine Vayburn, and it's just I think voicing piano.
00:57:56.080
It's a very beautiful poem of real care written in 1910, or at least put to music in 1910. It's a love
00:58:02.960
song about an absent love that can't be achieved. So it's Antoine Vayburn voice in piano, I believe.
00:58:10.560
Yeah, okay, so and so what we're going to hear, the voice is going to be
00:58:15.040
reciting this poem of Rainer Wilkes. So we'll leave you all with that and I
00:58:20.160
will look forward to having you tune in next week. Again, thanks Tom for coming on.
00:58:27.600
You're very welcome and until soon.
00:58:32.400
[Music]
00:58:42.400
[Music]
00:58:52.400
[Music]
00:59:02.400
[Music]
00:59:28.400
[Music]
00:59:32.400
[Music]
00:59:38.400
[Music]
00:59:48.400
[Music]
00:59:58.400
[Music]
01:00:08.400
[Music]
01:00:16.400
[Music]
01:00:26.400
[Music]
01:00:36.400
[Music]
01:00:42.400
[Music]
01:00:52.400
[Music]
01:01:02.400
[Music]
01:01:12.400
[Music]
01:01:22.400
[Music]
01:01:32.400
[Music]
01:01:42.400
[Music]
01:01:52.400
[Music]
01:02:02.400
[Music]
01:02:12.400
[Music]
01:02:22.400
[Music]
01:02:28.400
[Music]
01:02:38.400
[Music]
01:02:48.400
[Music]
01:02:58.400
[Music]
01:03:08.400
[Music]
01:03:18.400
[Music]
01:03:28.400
[Music]
01:03:42.400
[Music]