table of contents

04/11/2006

Cécile Alduy on American writers in Paris

A former student at the École Normale Supérieure rue d’Ulm, Professor Alduy received her Ph.D. in French Literature from the University of Reims in June 2003, where she wrote her dissertation on Renaissance poetry. Entitled “Nation, Self, and the Lure of Unity. Poetics and Genesis of a New French Genre, the “Amours” (France, 1544-1560),” her […]

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[ Music ]
00:00:15.000
This is KZSU Stanford.
00:00:19.000
Welcome to entitled opinions.
00:00:21.000
My name is Robert Harrison.
00:00:25.000
And we're coming to you live from the Stanford campus.
00:00:28.000
[ Music ]
00:00:50.000
If I were to say there are cities that well up from the unconscious
00:00:55.000
or that some cities are sworn to secrecy,
00:00:59.000
or that every city has a distinct timber to its noise quotient,
00:01:04.000
or that some cities laugh while others bleed, some profess,
00:01:09.000
others chant, some stutter, some bellow, some exhort,
00:01:14.000
and others whale.
00:01:17.000
Or if I were to quote invisible cities where
00:01:20.000
Elvino says, arriving at each new city, the traveler finds again a past of his
00:01:26.000
that he did not know he had.
00:01:29.000
Or if I were to affirm that the reality of a city resides in its imagination,
00:01:35.000
that its waking life hovers on the surface of a dream,
00:01:39.000
none of this remarkably enough would get us anywhere.
00:01:44.000
[ Music ]
00:02:11.000
If I not get us anywhere, but before you get somewhere,
00:02:15.000
you have to get ready to go, and that's what we're doing now, getting ready to go.
00:02:20.000
Where to?
00:02:22.000
To Paris, Miss Ami.
00:02:24.000
Paris.
00:02:25.000
To visit the American writers who lived or sojourned there during the 20th century.
00:02:31.000
I have a guest with me in the studio, Cecela Dree,
00:02:35.000
who is uniquely qualified to serve as our guide on this pilgrimage.
00:02:39.000
But before I introduce her to you, let me throw out one of my innocuous,
00:02:44.000
entitled opinions to the effect that Paris is the one European city,
00:02:49.000
where the American soul, if there is such a thing as the American soul,
00:02:54.000
and I believe there is, is least likely to recognize itself.
00:03:00.000
In fact, this irreducible dissimilarity may be exactly why so many American writers
00:03:06.000
went to Paris at critical junctures in their careers.
00:03:11.000
Here's how I see it.
00:03:13.000
The American soul is fundamentally wild, isolationist, not quite at home in the world.
00:03:20.000
It's true homeland is some impossible place beyond society, beyond language, beyond the law,
00:03:28.000
perhaps even beyond the body.
00:03:31.000
Proudly inarticulate when it comes to expressing what moves and matters to it,
00:03:36.000
the American soul is pledged to its native aphasia.
00:03:40.000
So much so that at its best, modern American literature gives voice to this aphasia
00:03:47.000
and renders it eloquent instead of overcoming it.
00:03:52.000
But Paris.
00:03:54.000
Ah, well, Paris is the most articulate city in the world.
00:03:59.000
It masters all forms of expression and is completely beyond all set pull,
00:04:04.000
or at home in its skin, as the French say.
00:04:09.000
Nothing could be further removed from the American way of being,
00:04:12.000
than being beyond all set pull.
00:04:15.000
Which is why we Americans have an irrepressible need to jump out of our skins from time to time.
00:04:22.000
Usually with the aid of spirits, or psychotropes of some sort,
00:04:27.000
or else with the aid of preachers, healers, fantasticators, or firearms.
00:04:35.000
Paris.
00:04:36.000
Paris.
00:04:37.000
Paris.
00:04:38.000
Paris.
00:04:39.000
Paris.
00:04:40.000
The word itself is in cantatory.
00:04:44.000
You voking a host of accessory images and sentiments,
00:04:47.000
even for people who have never been to the city.
00:04:51.000
Ie-Ie Cummings describes it best in his 1922 novel, The Anormous Room.
00:04:58.000
As a crowded night train transporting prisoners of war and other unfortunates,
00:05:03.000
pulls into the station during wartime,
00:05:06.000
"Some permissionaries cried Paris."
00:05:11.000
The woman across from me said, "Paris. Paris."
00:05:16.000
A great shout came up from every insane drowsy brain that had traveled with us,
00:05:21.000
a fierce and beautiful cry, which went the length of the train.
00:05:26.000
Paris, where one forgets, Paris, which is pleasure,
00:05:31.000
Paris in whom our souls live, Paris the beautiful.
00:05:36.000
Paris, all fair.
00:05:41.000
Someone once said of Rome that it is an eternal idea in the mind of God.
00:05:47.000
The same could never be said about Paris.
00:05:50.000
Paris is consummately human.
00:05:53.000
It's a garden where life in its human self-realizations, blooms and primary colors,
00:05:59.000
even under gray skies.
00:06:02.000
Ee- Cummings again.
00:06:05.000
Everywhere I sense the miraculous presence of living beings,
00:06:09.000
everyone alive, alive, alive.
00:06:16.000
There are many places in the world where one senses an exuberant presence of life,
00:06:21.000
but Paris conjugates life with form like nowhere else on earth.
00:06:26.000
In Paris, the presence of life is never riotous, tropical or overflowing,
00:06:31.000
but always contained in a flowering multiplicity of forms.
00:06:36.000
Forms that intensify life by bringing its mastered energies into the radiance of appearance.
00:06:43.000
It is impossible in Paris not to feel that this is the one place that gets life right,
00:06:49.000
and maximizes its potential for being lived.
00:06:55.000
Unlike the French, we Americans don't know what it's like to be uninhibited,
00:06:59.000
even as we submit to a regime of form.
00:07:02.000
We're insufficiently humanized for that.
00:07:05.000
We spend too much of our time either maintaining our inhibitions or looking for ways to shed them.
00:07:11.000
But again, it's this quintessentially American ill-at-easeness in the world,
00:07:17.000
and that means in the American homeland as well,
00:07:20.000
which made Paris such an asylum for 20th-century American writers,
00:07:25.000
who were typically even more ill-at-eas in spirit than their compatriots.
00:07:30.000
For these writers, Paris was anything but a mirror reflecting an image of themselves.
00:07:36.000
It was the opposite of that.
00:07:38.000
In Paris, they saw a city which, by contrast, put their own nation in sharp perspective,
00:07:45.000
and allowed them to take their distance from it.
00:07:48.000
Nothing is more essential to American writers probing the murky depths of their own culture
00:07:54.000
than gaining such a distance.
00:07:56.000
And it seems that Paris offered them just the right distance from America,
00:08:00.000
neither too far nor too close.
00:08:05.000
Of course, these are just my own breezy speculations
00:08:08.000
to find out what was really going on with American writers in Paris.
00:08:12.000
We'll turn now to my guest Cecilandri,
00:08:15.000
herself a Parisian who teaches French literature here at Stanford,
00:08:19.000
Cecil welcomed to the program.
00:08:22.000
Thank you, Robert.
00:08:24.000
I should mention that just this past fall, Cecilandri taught a course in Paris at the Stanford Center
00:08:30.000
on American writers in Paris, which must have been quite a class.
00:08:34.000
How did that course go, Cecil? Can you tell us what you did in it?
00:08:37.000
Yes, of course. It was wonderful because what we did was we used Paris as the classroom for the class.
00:08:45.000
We had, of course, a serious syllabus with a list of American writers from Gertrude Stein,
00:08:52.000
who was brought up to Henry Miller, Fitzgerald, Henry Miller,
00:08:56.000
N.A.'s Neen, the bead poets, and even a modern-day New Yorker,
00:09:02.000
Adam Gopnik, who lived in Paris just a couple years ago.
00:09:06.000
But what we really did was explore the relationship between the texts and the place itself.
00:09:12.000
So we spent a great deal of time actually going to the cafes and the streets
00:09:18.000
and the bookstores where these writers got their liking for Paris and got their inspiration from.
00:09:25.000
And I think the students also really like the fact that I tried to put them in the position of writers themselves.
00:09:33.000
Yeah, in what sense?
00:09:35.000
Well, among the so-called assignment they had to do,
00:09:39.000
where, for instance, to ghost an anaphton in a cafe and try to
00:09:44.000
just to for what will be a good cafe to write as Hemingway puts it in a movable feast.
00:09:50.000
And they also were writing diaries, reporting on their extremes of being abroad and feeling.
00:09:57.000
At times, as you said, Eli Ease with a place where they're outside of their comfort zone, basically.
00:10:04.000
And what it meant for the sense of their self-identity is Americans.
00:10:09.000
Do they get a sense of what it must have been to be a writer in Paris and the first thing?
00:10:15.000
Yeah.
00:10:16.000
There's this whole idea that the cafe culture that writers had to do all their writing in cafes.
00:10:21.000
Do we know that this was more the norm than not the norm that American writers would do a lot of their writing in cafes, actually?
00:10:30.000
I think that the mystic of the American writers in a cafe, you know,
00:10:35.000
a constricting in his little paragraph while sipping a beer comes mostly from Hemingway's movable feast.
00:10:42.000
More than beer, no, with Hemingway.
00:10:44.000
Yeah, depending on what time during the day and the morning he starts with a real cafe,
00:10:48.000
and then very quickly switched to a rum or a kongak.
00:10:52.000
But Gertrude Stein obviously was writing not that much, actually, a half an hour day at home.
00:10:58.000
And other writers, like Isra Penn, were not writing in cafes at all.
00:11:02.000
But there's the scene of the cafe, even that they're not writing there.
00:11:06.000
So, yeah.
00:11:07.000
Good. Well, there are successive generations of American writers.
00:11:10.000
We're talking about the 20th century, because we could also go back into the 19th,
00:11:14.000
and even into the 18th century would be fascinating.
00:11:16.000
Maybe we can talk about how Jefferson and Franklin had this very productive relationship with France.
00:11:22.000
But concentrating on the 20th century, we have successive generations that go to Paris
00:11:29.000
and do some of their most interesting creative work in the city.
00:11:33.000
So why don't we enumerate, who does it start with?
00:11:38.000
I think for the 20th century, it really starts with Gertrude Stein,
00:11:42.000
who leaves Oakland, not from here, in 1903, to join her brother in Paris.
00:11:48.000
And they live with the Floches.
00:11:50.000
And that's just a parenthesis of the also court experience of teaching in Paris
00:11:55.000
for the students here to go and the overseas campus that is situated right at the heart of the American district in Mumbai.
00:12:04.000
So we are like one block from who the Floches were Gertrude Stein,
00:12:07.000
her the most famous salon in the 20th century, basically.
00:12:10.000
So she arrives at the beginning of the 20th century.
00:12:13.000
Did she have a specific motive for going to Paris originally?
00:12:17.000
She actually to collect art.
00:12:20.000
Her brother introduced her to do so.
00:12:22.000
So she started collecting art with her brother and the art she was collecting was mostly young printers that no one else wanted to buy as Picasso and Matisse.
00:12:32.000
So of course she had a really interesting eye for art.
00:12:35.000
The other reason for going to Paris though was that she discovered she could also have the personal life as a lesbian that she wanted to have and could not in Oakland.
00:12:46.000
So that's a second aspect that she doesn't talk about in her writings, but is a peer from her life.
00:12:51.000
Her salon was a welcoming place not only for American writers, but also for the French artistic scene at the avant-garde.
00:13:01.000
Completely avant-garde.
00:13:03.000
She wanted to be seen as the mother of modernism.
00:13:08.000
In the autobiography of Alice B. Talkles that she wrote, although it's supposed to be written in the name of her companion,
00:13:17.000
she says speaking in the name of Alice that she met three great geniuses Picasso, Joyce and Gertrude Stein.
00:13:24.000
And of course people can disagree and the third one, but Gertrude Stein invited and sponsored basically all the painters, the keepest painters from Picasso to Bach, Duh-huh, Matisse of course, Cézanne and so on.
00:13:39.000
She also welcomed French poets, like Apo-Dine for instance, and Mahélor Haunson and the surrealist poets, but she really became like the gut mother of the next generation of American writers who came in the 20s.
00:13:55.000
And here I'm talking about Hemingway, Duh-s-Passos, a William Carlos Williams, EE Cummings that you just quoted.
00:14:04.000
Also, Lesernan poets as Anderson Sherwood and so on, and Fitzgerald's of course.
00:14:12.000
When you say that she was a godmother, do you mean that as just being the hostess of the salon or was she a godmother also in terms of the aesthetic that she promoted herself?
00:14:25.000
That's a very good question. I think that the influence she had was that her salon was the place where all this writers created a community.
00:14:37.000
And it's not that much that she herself was that influential by her writings or her advice, like she discussed Hemingway's writings with him, but very soon he just initiated himself from her advices.
00:14:52.000
But she was the person who gathered all this community together and also set the tone for an avant-garde mentality, I would say.
00:15:02.000
And the idea or the murder almost to go beyond what's been done before in terms of forms and content.
00:15:10.000
And this raises the question that we want to explore a little bit about how much what was happening in France and in Paris in terms of the artistic literary movements had a direct influence on modern American literature of those writers went to Paris.
00:15:26.000
Certainly it would seem that Stein Gertrude Stein herself was very influenced by it, but we have to remember it was a very rich moment.
00:15:35.000
In European modernism, Paris being the real centre of it, you have foveism, cubism, data, surrealism and so forth.
00:15:45.000
How much of these movements did Gertrude Stein herself actually appropriate and transform into her distinctive American avant-garde literary style?
00:16:01.000
I think that she consciously wanted to become a cubist writer.
00:16:07.000
So she took her discussions with Picasso, but he's hard.
00:16:12.000
The concept that you have to get rid of a monolithic vision of an object or a situation and put flat on the table or the aspects of, for instance, a thing and describe it from different perspectives.
00:16:26.000
And the other thing that is really determinant in her writing is the importance of form over content, of meaning also in rationality.
00:16:37.000
And that probably has been influenced by the surrealist movement as well as Apo-de-Nair, who started these kilograms and calligraphic poems just before World War I.
00:16:49.000
So she said there are three modernists, so it was Picasso and Joyce and Gertrude Stein.
00:16:58.000
I would put Stravinsky in there too because he was the other in music, the other great modernist.
00:17:07.000
And I would not, myself, put Gertrude Stein in that company.
00:17:12.000
In fact, I don't know where I would put her myself.
00:17:16.000
So she is the godmother in certainly the Salah, and do the writers that come in the subsequently, which I guess is in the 20s, no, after the First World War.
00:17:31.000
In fact, many of them that came in the 20s had gone to Paris or to France originally during the First World War, is that correct?
00:17:39.000
Absolutely. And that's one element of their sense of exile within American society when they came back from World War I.
00:17:48.000
Joyce Possos, E.E. Cummings, Hemingway flew to Europe to serve as soldiers, and the Ravi 1917 and really experienced the worst of World War I.
00:18:03.000
Then we're kind of left addressed when they came back to the United States, having experienced something that they could not relate in so many words, and feeling this distance within the country that was supposed to be home.
00:18:17.000
So the desire to go back to Europe, which was the origin of their exile in the first place, and the destruction of their sense of the meaning of civilization, was probably the kind of pilgrimage to, like the traumatic place of their sense of who they were.
00:18:32.000
Well, let's take one at a time, not all of them obviously, because it's a whole profusion of people that were not even mentioned on this show, who would fall into the category of American writers in Paris.
00:18:45.000
But clearly some of the major figures Hemingway is not someone that I would in any way associate with the avant-garde aesthetics of Stein and her, the French avant-garde movements, either literary or artistic.
00:18:59.000
So he goes to Paris, I don't know how much he learns from the French in that regard, but clearly he recalls those years that he spent in Paris in the 20s as the happiest and the most creative of his life.
00:19:13.000
But is it fair to say that he took his own baggage with him?
00:19:18.000
Absolutely, absolutely.
00:19:20.000
And that's a very interesting thing about the Americans' writer that come to Paris is that for all of them, it's Paris is really the cradle of their birth as writers.
00:19:31.000
And what Hemingway describing in a movable feast is really his working sessions in cafes and how he crafted the style.
00:19:40.000
He has a whole ethics about the one true sentence that he has to start every paragraph was.
00:19:45.000
So he fashions this persona of the new author learning the craft, but he adheres completely to the work ethics of American values.
00:19:57.000
And he's extremely dismissive of the bohemian life, of other American writers that hang out in cafes.
00:20:03.000
He doesn't want any sexual promiscuity, was the French actual sexual, intellectual promiscuity, either, since he doesn't read any French book really.
00:20:14.000
He doesn't mingle with the surrealist or the French avant-garde.
00:20:19.000
So Hemingway basically finds a heaven for his growth as a writer, but not a place where he would be transformed from the outside.
00:20:30.000
That's well put, yeah.
00:20:32.000
And learning the craft, and we know that Hemingway was a master of the short sentence.
00:20:39.000
And what I was alluding to in my opening remarks as giving a style to aphasia, if that's not putting it too dramatically.
00:20:48.000
But very American in that regard, one is at odds with this medium that's called language.
00:20:57.000
One doesn't inhabit it in a serene way, but always in a nervous tension with its constraints.
00:21:06.000
And part of the distinctive American style that you get in Hemingway, I think, is this undercurrent of illiesness there within the sentences themselves, no?
00:21:20.000
Absolutely. And he developed the theory of the iceberg in a movable feast, which saves basically that for to get a really good short story, you have to leave out the important part of the story.
00:21:32.000
And that's exactly what you said, that very short sentence where you say less than what you want to say, and that's where the tension lies basically, and that's what makes it ill-quint.
00:21:43.000
But you can totally write Hemingway de-stinceded himself from sign in that matter.
00:21:51.000
And what's fascinating is that the American literature was born in Paris in the 20th century.
00:21:59.000
Was he on good terms with Stein?
00:22:01.000
Up to a certain point, he benefited from her patronage to get his ways in the world of Paris.
00:22:10.000
But almost all of these writers, when they recollect their memories, try to surpass each other in the art of blaming others for not being the right writer in Paris.
00:22:22.000
So Stein dismissed his joys and is repound and as really ironic against him, and Hemingway does the same with the Christian Stein in his own book.
00:22:32.000
So they had a cold, I would say, at some point in their relationship.
00:22:36.000
He has a major presence there for a few years, at least.
00:22:42.000
He was already in London since 1912, I believe.
00:22:48.000
And after what he decided that London was dead intellectually, and that the only place in Europe where you could still save American literature from potential suicide was to go to Paris.
00:23:03.000
So he stood there from 1920 to 1924.
00:23:06.000
And he had his own kind of salon, sort of.
00:23:09.000
Yeah, and it was, so some of these were not for dentists, also the same, never heard of Muh-Bannaz.
00:23:15.000
And he set himself in the role of the nice uncle, I would say, who would invite, he was extremely kind to young writers in encouraging.
00:23:26.000
Very generously.
00:23:27.000
Extremely generous of his time and his advice.
00:23:30.000
He would never really promote himself as a writer.
00:23:34.000
He would always try to show off the furniture he was crafting himself in his little studio instead of showing his art, which is an interesting stance as a poet.
00:23:45.000
Yeah.
00:23:46.000
Pound then subsequently leaves France for Italy, and Italy becomes his true, let's say adopted homeland.
00:23:52.000
Yes.
00:23:53.000
And it's quite interesting because I know that T.S. Eliot, from what I understand, only spent about a year there in 1910.
00:23:59.000
And yet was much more influenced by French literary modernismism in particular.
00:24:05.000
Absolutely.
00:24:06.000
Whereas Pound, we had a show on Pound a few months ago with Margie Pearloff, and she remarked that you read his can't those.
00:24:14.000
You know, you have all sorts of traditions that are worked into it, you know, from the Chinese, especially the Italian, Dolce Ciedenola.
00:24:20.000
But strangely enough, you know, the French don't, it's not a big presence in Pound.
00:24:26.000
I think he turned more to Italy than in the class.
00:24:30.000
Yes, in class, this is him, in a way.
00:24:32.000
Class, this is him, right?
00:24:34.000
So, Fitzgerald.
00:24:36.000
That's another one.
00:24:39.000
Well, Fitzgerald is a good example because you have, you know, the positive thought of Paris and the negative thought of Paris.
00:24:47.000
So, if it was a heaven, it could be also hell for others and a place of doom and failure.
00:24:52.000
And Fitzgerald, when he visited France, was already under the decline of his LaRéd Gienes.
00:25:00.000
And this is clearly how he's depicted by Hemingway in a movable feast.
00:25:05.000
He didn't really produce much when he was in France.
00:25:08.000
He hated France saying that it was not a good place to write, which is really the country to what Hemingway was thinking.
00:25:18.000
He led the life, you know, the Bohemian life, the nightlife, and the United States,
00:25:26.000
the Chinese, the Chinese basically.
00:25:28.000
Yeah, he did that.
00:25:30.000
It's all the life.
00:25:31.000
What years was he there?
00:25:33.000
He arrived in '24 and stayed almost until the beginning of the '30s.
00:25:37.000
Beginning of the '30s.
00:25:38.000
And he traveled from Paris to the Riviera to Switzerland, or something.
00:25:42.000
I was thinking of Tender as the night, which is a novel that takes place in France, Paris as the big then the Riviera.
00:25:49.000
And he seems to at least in that novel, pretend to have a perfect command of French.
00:25:56.000
Yes, not absolutely sure it was true.
00:25:59.000
The good thing about Tender is the night for the purpose of her topic is that it really just picks the American community as this completely,
00:26:07.000
in close community that doesn't communicate with a French at all.
00:26:10.000
Was that the case actually?
00:26:12.000
It was pretty much the case for the people like Hemingway in the '20s.
00:26:17.000
It's a complicated friend with Henry Miller in the '30s.
00:26:21.000
And Gertrude Stein profess not to read French, although she was fluent in French, but she had this murder that French is an oral language.
00:26:31.000
And English is a written language.
00:26:33.000
And that's another element that's really important, I think, for why they would leave the United States to become writers is that
00:26:39.000
immersed in the foreign language that they could not master and understand and be influenced by that complete freedom to discover their own new forms.
00:26:49.000
They were not under the pressure of a large tradition.
00:26:54.000
They had complete free range of styles and forms in front of them.
00:27:02.000
So did they spend a lot of time among themselves, the Americans and the cafes, and were they insulated?
00:27:10.000
Did they take their own American probability and actually perpetuate it in Paris by just saying among themselves?
00:27:18.000
I do think so.
00:27:19.000
I did that, yeah.
00:27:20.000
Yeah, actually there's a quote from this writer, Sinclair Lewis came to Paris in the '22s, but he was already really famous and authorized.
00:27:29.000
And he was not well welcome by the American community.
00:27:33.000
And so he, in a retaliation, described them as going to this café l'odotme, which is conveniently located at the intersection of Wurvermuparnez and Avenue Hazpay, which actually looks like the crossing of six avenue and eight feet in New York and where the waiters speak Americanese.
00:27:52.000
So basically he was, um, per capturing the American writers, speaking among themselves the same language and for producing, like pretending to avoid standardization, but legislating another kind of standardization in Paris.
00:28:09.000
So we have Gertrins Steind, who's the godmother, then the '20s is a big, a big generation.
00:28:16.000
And then Henry Miller comes subsequently to that, no?
00:28:21.000
Absolutely. He comes in 1931, and he comes completely isolated as opposed to the crowd of American writers, who actually talked to each other like Hemingway came because Sherwood Earnison told him this is the place to go and he has yet letters of introduction to go to Gertrins Steind Salon.
00:28:39.000
Henry Miller comes with $5 in his pocket, he's sent by his wife, wants to get rid of him, and he's been the first two years in complete despair and poverty until he'd just be the same.
00:28:50.000
Until he discovers the form of the book is going to write, which is 'Tropic of Cancer'.
00:28:56.000
So it's a completely different scene, it's the depression, the American dollar is not anymore this past-pert to any kind of high-life in Paris, which is the case in the '20s.
00:29:08.000
And Henry Miller also reads the French, he reads everything from 'Rabblet to the Young and Proost and Hugo', which is also another contrast to the form of generation.
00:29:21.000
Yeah. So he actually inhabits a different Paris, is it Mont Patinas as well, but his Paris is very CD, and it's a much darker, and boldy in Paris, if you like.
00:29:34.000
If he's an inhale, absolutely. I was looking for a quote that I got from your course readings, but I'm not finding it here where he's talking about how you can't even find the way to the horror district or something.
00:29:49.000
Yes, yes, yes, I don't. I don't, well, I'll find it.
00:29:53.000
Well, the description of Paris, the other thing is Paris should always be in quotation marks for these writers, because there's as many Paris and their authors.
00:30:03.000
And although Henry Miller lived in Mont Patinas in the exact same neighborhood as Hemingway and Fitzgerald, he's description of Paris is completely different, and it's seen that he's Paris is this dark place of marginals and prostitutes, the leading metaphor and
00:30:23.520
The top of cancer is that of disease, Paris is this gigantic body, a womb that expels excremence and sweat and blood and all characters are
00:30:34.520
outcast or marginals, the dominant feelings are despair and alienation and acceleration out of that, because he found he's way as a writer.
00:30:45.520
And there's the force of life in decay itself, almost, for Henry Miller.
00:30:50.520
Here's it's not the quote I was thinking of, but here's another one of his, where he says, "This Paris to which I alone had the key hardly lends itself to a tour, even with the best of intentions.
00:31:01.520
It is a Paris that has to be lived, that has to be experienced each day in a thousand different forms of torture, a Paris that grows inside you like a cancer and grows and grows until you are eaten away by it."
00:31:14.520
So the Tropic of Cancer, I think, has some reference to this cancer, which was a productive one, I created one, it was a matrix.
00:31:24.520
It's exactly, I mean, cancer is this, can we see that something very negative, but at the same time it's expanding and growing and multiplying in all those different forms, and it's actually the form of the book itself,
00:31:39.520
of trafficking of cancer, which has no narrative, but it explains in all different divergence, and what Henry Miller really embraced his experience of Paris was the flow of life.
00:31:54.520
But life in all its forms, high and low life, the bloody and the mystic.
00:32:02.520
So there's this all-encompassing book that is produced out of it, and he also describes Paris as the cradle of all artificial birth.
00:32:13.520
Like this is his gigantic wombs from which everything is masyrated in reborn in different ways.
00:32:21.520
Yeah, well I think that's a Paris more in his own mind, yeah.
00:32:25.520
Absolutely.
00:32:26.520
Well he arrived in Paris alone without introduction, but he didn't say alone all the time, no, because he had a famous affair with another American writer, Anais Nien.
00:32:38.520
Who was Anais Nien?
00:32:40.520
Well Anais Nien is interesting, because she's in between, she is born in France actually, from a French father and a Venezuelan mother, and she's American too.
00:32:52.520
She lived in the United States from 7 to 24, and she was raised in New York schools.
00:33:01.520
She decided to write in English, it's a very intentional choice, so she's an American writer from French descent, if you wish.
00:33:09.520
What's interesting is that she arrived in the 20th with her husband, and first in her diary's describe as she wants to be the perfect wife, and she hates the promiscuity that she finds in Paris in this entraality.
00:33:21.520
And then, here she goes, in 1931 she meets Henry Miller, and they have this "Tour de Fair" that has been disclosed much much later in the 70s after everybody died, basically.
00:33:32.520
It was so, it was Contales.
00:33:34.520
And she discover herself as a writer, and as a woman writer, almost through sexuality with Henry Miller.
00:33:42.520
This was discovered in the 70s through what sort of documentation.
00:33:46.520
Well, at her diary, the her diary's were published in '65, I believe, and she had edited them already, so it was already cut from almost half of what she had already written, and she left in her will that the remainder would be disclosed after the death of her husband and after the death of her second husband.
00:34:07.520
So that was much later.
00:34:10.520
So it's just her full diary was disclosed after the primary protagonist of her life could not be affected.
00:34:18.520
How long did they, how long did they refer last?
00:34:21.520
At their physical affair lasted for three to four years, but then she switched to other leading intellectual figures among them, Antonin Aftol, and the psycho-analyzed-oto-rank.
00:34:35.520
So she was a much nurtured by strong intellectual minds.
00:34:41.520
I've tried to read her diary's.
00:34:44.520
I've spent years since I tried.
00:34:46.520
I never got into them for some reason.
00:34:48.520
It's something about, I mean, you can't love everyone, obviously.
00:34:51.520
Do you like her diary?
00:34:53.520
Actually, I do.
00:34:54.520
Just because you see the evolution of her, well, first you really see what it is to the American woman in the 20s, coming from New York.
00:35:03.520
And she was all this inhibitions she were talking about.
00:35:06.520
And she was refusing to adhere to what she calls "front sensuality."
00:35:12.520
But you see the temptation.
00:35:14.520
She keeps reading it, basically.
00:35:16.520
Oh, it's so bad.
00:35:17.520
She keeps reading it.
00:35:18.520
And then at some point she just succumbs.
00:35:21.520
And really develops her talents once she embraces her more mature self, I would say.
00:35:29.520
So in that sense, it's an interesting writer.
00:35:32.520
Well, you have a number of quotes for hers on that handout you gave to your students.
00:35:36.520
I'm looking at some of them.
00:35:38.520
This one strikes me as particularly American.
00:35:41.520
I am at home in the marvelous, absolutely at home, the unknown, the mysterious, the exotic, the strange, the never lived before the difficult.
00:35:49.520
I am uncomfortable and paralyzed in the common.
00:35:52.520
The common is unfamiliar to me.
00:35:55.520
Whereas my experience of Paris, I'm not talking about the 20s and things, but I think there's the wonder of Paris.
00:36:01.520
The wonder of Paris is the way in which the common is so marvelous.
00:36:06.520
And the common is where everything is really happening the every day.
00:36:12.520
And this opposition between the marvelous and the common is, you know, might be typically American, but I don't think it applies to the way the French live, you know, the wonder of the common.
00:36:25.520
But it's interesting in terms of choosing to live abroad though, that wherever you live, if you live abroad is this constant overload of new sensations and new perceptions just from being in a place that you don't know.
00:36:46.520
And being immersed in a language that you don't master either brings this, the shattering of your identity and expansion of yourself because you discover all those new things.
00:36:58.520
Yeah, I think it was Gertrude Stein who said that every writer needs two countries or two homelands, one where you're from and the other where you live.
00:37:10.520
And that the one where you live should not be your native.
00:37:16.520
Yeah, there's one where you belong from and you write about that you write about.
00:37:19.520
And you had another place to be able to see that.
00:37:22.520
So in that sense, Paris was like the matrix for writing about America.
00:37:28.520
Absolutely.
00:37:29.520
And America reveals itself at a distance, at this distance, whatever that distance is, it separates America from Paris.
00:37:36.520
That one can see into the American soul things that maybe back home don't reveal themselves to the writer.
00:37:48.520
Yeah, it's particularly true for people who came after World War II like James Baldwin, for instance.
00:37:56.520
Yeah, let's talk about James Baldwin.
00:37:58.520
There are also these African-American generation of writers.
00:38:02.520
James Baldwin, Richard Wright.
00:38:04.520
First, he was invited by Kurt Tristan.
00:38:07.520
That's how he managed to get a passport to go to France and was welcome with Simon de Beauvoir and Joppo Stock.
00:38:13.520
So this is this huge contrast right from the first step, he takes in the city of Paris.
00:38:21.520
Having to fight to get a passport to get out of the United States and then being welcomed by the leading intellectuals of France when he arrives in France.
00:38:29.520
So he has Richard Wright and then James Baldwin arrives a couple years later.
00:38:34.520
But this time he arrives completely alone and poor.
00:38:39.520
And he stays for almost ten years and discovers what is his American-ness by being in Paris.
00:38:48.520
And he has this whole reflection about the fact that he's more distant from Africans from Africa.
00:38:58.520
And Europeans than he's from a white American.
00:39:01.520
And that being an expactor is the American experience, so being enruded, uprooted and algae-nated from any past.
00:39:10.520
And that what he learns is that he shared a common history with white Americans he thought he was fighting.
00:39:19.520
Yeah. That's interesting because I guess I was trying to suggest in my own words in my opening that
00:39:26.520
the American soul is fundamentally expatriate. Whether it leaves the home or not.
00:39:34.520
And that the literal condition of being expatriate can reveal what is quintessentially American in the self.
00:39:45.520
In fact, there's a quote here of Baldwin, which I think is interesting.
00:39:50.520
It's almost in a spirit of disappointment or delusion.
00:39:56.520
If I had any intimation that the self I was going to find would turn out to be the same self from which I had spent so much time and flight, I would have stayed home.
00:40:06.520
Yes. It's a great quote. It's from this book, "Jovani's Room," which is a novel.
00:40:11.520
Which doesn't deal with the black condition, which was what expected from an African-American writer.
00:40:19.520
What also James Baldwin really appreciated in his Dainthairs is that he was confronted to the root question of the self, not the self, like American, but just the self.
00:40:31.520
Yes.
00:40:32.520
He was liberated from the gaze of the others and how the look of the others defined himself at the core of his own intuition of who he was.
00:40:42.520
And, rather than in Paris, he was stripped bare of any social preconception of who he was and was confronted with the real question. Who am I?
00:40:52.520
Right. Apart from all the identity politics that we were always all that noise about it in America, that we're always being defined by a category rather than a
00:41:02.500
self. Yeah. And actually, I thought again about the quote you had in your introduction by E.E. Cummings about the human-ness that you find in Paris.
00:41:13.500
And this universal quality of just being human beings.
00:41:18.500
And I wonder if Ken be related to the famous universalism of the French who don't want to look into differences.
00:41:25.500
And it's not a source of problems that maybe Americans can be really liberating to be looked at as just human beings and not the woman, again, lesbian, African-American.
00:41:37.500
Well, let me make a confession here because a lot of people find that French universalism is something objectionable about it that is related to imperialist ambitions.
00:41:47.500
So I'm a big fan of French universalism. And that one has a sense. I always ask myself as an American when I go to Paris, why can't America not be like France where everyone is a human being first and foremost?
00:42:05.500
And that the categorization is completely secondary if not tertiary or if not irrelevant.
00:42:11.500
And where, especially for example, the ex colonized groups seem French first and foremost.
00:42:22.500
And that's what they say actually.
00:42:24.500
And being French doesn't mean necessarily being belonged to a particular nation, but having an allegiance to a certain idea that humanity is a universal.
00:42:36.500
And you start with that as the given and all the rest then becomes these sort of minor differences that add to the diversity and richness of the human community.
00:42:51.500
Absolutely.
00:42:53.500
So I'm not going to deny you since I am French.
00:42:57.500
I've been raised in this idea.
00:42:59.500
But I think from James Baldwin it was particularly liberating to plus if you think about it.
00:43:05.500
He's a very different French.
00:43:06.500
He did. He speaks really well French. We have interviews of him and French he speaks really well French.
00:43:12.500
And also for a writer, any limitations on your identity is going to be a limitation of what you can write and how it can write.
00:43:22.500
So this sense of getting back to the core question of the self is also getting back to the source of your inspiration and your originality as a writer.
00:43:34.500
Yeah, that's interesting. He didn't write in French.
00:43:37.500
No, no, no, no.
00:43:38.500
And this is also interesting.
00:43:41.500
It confirms what you've been suggesting, which is that Paris was a place where Americans went to discover themselves as Americans and get a perspective on America.
00:43:52.500
And although they're expatriate, they never expatriate themselves in a truly radical sense in the way that someone like Samuel Beckett expatriated himself.
00:44:03.500
By not only going to Paris but expatriating himself linguistically and writing in a language which was not his native tongue.
00:44:14.500
And neither was he just trying to become a French author. It wasn't that he was just trying to appropriate for it.
00:44:20.500
But that he would write French in order to retain a certain foreignness even in the linguistic idiom that he was writing.
00:44:32.500
As he said, in order to avoid all the embedded cliches that come with your native tongue.
00:44:38.500
So I think it would be interesting. It would have been interesting if some of these American writers had actually gone all the way and left us some interesting works in French.
00:44:48.500
I don't only won, which is Jean-Grena, who really felt he was almost French and decided to write in French.
00:44:59.500
But if you think about it, the Samuel Beckett's attitude is in a way, not completely similar, but in both the American writers' attitude in Samuel Beckett's, you see this need to gain this distance and go beyond the norms and what is already, as you said, embedded in your head as what you should write.
00:45:24.500
And Gretchen Stein and Hemingway and these other men who were extremely inventive in terms of forms, did manage to go beyond the American language even if they chose it as their really linguistic way.
00:45:41.500
They transformed it, they made it their own, they expanded its linguistic possibilities.
00:45:48.500
But from Beckett's point of view, they never really left their homeland in so far as they never left their English as such.
00:46:00.500
So, Sissy, we have a few other generations, at least one other generation that we want to talk about, and that's the beat generation.
00:46:09.500
Yes. Is that in the sick, I don't know if it's in the report.
00:46:12.500
They arrived at the beginning of the '60s and what?
00:46:17.500
And we're talking here about the Caroac.
00:46:19.500
Well, all of them. Jack Caroac, Alan Ginsburg, Baro, Corso, the old end up in this very small Shabby Hotel, Nothrujiluca, and the '60s small, and don't go and try to find it because it didn't exhibit anymore, and it's now in the very rich neighborhood.
00:46:37.500
But it was completely shabby, they had no money, basically.
00:46:40.500
And they didn't spend time writing that much, I have to say. They experimented a lot more with substances than words in language.
00:46:50.500
But what's interesting about them is that the whole beat generation movement seems to find it's too habitated in a place like Paris, where there's this acceptance of the poet, of the poet, moody tradition, and they're re-enacting 100th century,
00:47:09.500
100 years afterwards, what Hambou and Vallende did in the same place.
00:47:14.500
Another thing that Wallace took me is that a number of these writers got published in Paris, even if it was in English, because their books would be forbidden in the United States.
00:47:24.500
Well, Henry Miller for sure.
00:47:26.500
And we made it for sure, and it was not after, 30 years after the original print that it was published in the United States.
00:47:32.500
But also Lolita, for instance, even if the book of didn't stay in Paris as such.
00:47:37.500
But the naked lunch was also published in Paris before it could be published in the United States.
00:47:43.500
And when the beat poets were hanging out in Paris, they were hearing from the suit that the trial of Feltengeti, the St. Francisco.
00:47:55.500
Yeah, poet and publisher, he was sued because of the public performance of Hall by Ginsburg.
00:48:04.500
And so there's this whole contrast between either a permissive note of freedom that he found in Paris, and the American constrain on thoughts and expression.
00:48:17.500
And that's another element of freedom that could find in Paris too.
00:48:21.500
But you're saying that they spent more of their time doped out rather than...
00:48:27.500
And actually writing? Yeah, actually writing were immersed in that.
00:48:31.500
And of course their heroes were in many ways the symbolists of Bodle and the poet Modi, Hambo, and...
00:48:39.500
Yeah, and when there's and nomads, there are really people traveling and traveling with no senses at home.
00:48:48.500
Sure.
00:48:50.500
Well, this raises the whole question of the, in general, the relations between France and American, how much America owes in terms of its inspiration to France, if not to Paris directly.
00:49:04.500
And I mentioned earlier the pounding fathers, I mean the framers of the Costa Jefferson and Franklin, who for whom their sojourn in Paris was so incredibly important.
00:49:17.500
In terms of their thinking about the essence of a republic, about what is a republic, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and the way there was...
00:49:29.500
Well, there was a mutual sort of influence there.
00:49:34.500
And admiration.
00:49:35.500
And admiration, because the French Revolution is actually subsequent to the American Revolution.
00:49:40.500
And in many ways the American Revolution, which does have a strong component of French inspiration, then in turn becomes a model of inspiration, at least an inspiration is its own right for the French Revolution.
00:49:55.500
And of course we have our Statue of Liberty and so forth.
00:50:00.500
It's something that continues from what I gather with writers that still to this day, I think are going to Paris in the Ultra.
00:50:14.500
Something might be a little bit cliche now for...
00:50:16.500
I think it's a little bit over-diet.
00:50:18.500
I think probably the consummate, and maybe Jim Morrison, who, when he got sick of being a pop star in America, goes to Paris to be a poet,
00:50:29.500
thinking that he's finally going to do what he always wanted to do, which is be taken seriously as a poet, not just a singer.
00:50:38.500
And of course he dies in Paris in '71, he's still buried there in Pérez.
00:50:44.500
I don't know if it was a whole cult on his tomb.
00:50:47.500
Exactly, yeah.
00:50:49.500
But that seems to be almost a kind of end to...
00:50:54.500
I wouldn't call it a myth because it's far more than a myth.
00:50:57.500
It's as real as you can get in terms of what American literature in the 20th century owes to the Parisian influence and hospitality.
00:51:11.500
Yes, that's a lot of the hospitality in that sense.
00:51:13.500
And it's typical also that they could go to Paris, that part of the hospitality of Paris would be that liberalism by which the Parisians would not...
00:51:27.500
That Paris doesn't insist on colonizing anyone who comes there.
00:51:30.500
You can do what you want.
00:51:32.500
That's either tolerance or indifference.
00:51:35.500
Actually, Gertrude sign, and up to this day, I know, an American poet who comes back to Paris, and he's always amazed at...
00:51:42.500
how intellectuals are really admired and respected in France, in French culture at large, and have a place in society.
00:51:50.500
And Gertrude sign was saying that there was a little anecdote where she wanted to park in this garage and the guy who managed to the garage.
00:51:58.500
Oh, yes, of course, you're a writer, you need to place.
00:52:01.500
And so she got a parking slot when a politician next to her and a common-day person would not have one.
00:52:09.500
That's my kind of place.
00:52:11.500
Yeah.
00:52:12.500
The poet first, politician.
00:52:14.500
The politician.
00:52:15.500
Last.
00:52:16.500
Last.
00:52:17.500
You know, to see someone listening to our program would naturally assume that what we're talking about is your area of specialization.
00:52:27.500
That you're in modern French and the influence of France, but actually we should tell our listeners that you're not at all in that field by Fort Macillon.
00:52:40.500
Yes.
00:52:41.500
But you're both a medievalist and a Renaissance scholar, you know?
00:52:45.500
Absolutely.
00:52:46.500
It's the whole paradox.
00:52:47.500
I was teaching American writers in Paris, although I am a Parisian expatuate in Stanford, and I'm specializing in Renaissance poetry in particular.
00:52:57.500
So, yes.
00:52:58.500
And this is your third year here with us?
00:53:00.500
Yes, absolutely.
00:53:01.500
And what courses are you teaching now here?
00:53:05.500
I'm teaching an undergrad, introduction to a medieval and Renaissance literature called "Athership, Book Culture and National Building in Media of
00:53:14.500
a Renaissance France."
00:53:15.500
And it's a lot of fun.
00:53:16.500
Fantastic.
00:53:17.500
We also congratulate you.
00:53:19.500
You've been recently married and you, this is, continues the theme of the Franco-American relations because your husband is an American, not only an American, but he's also a musician.
00:53:31.500
Yes.
00:53:32.500
Jazz musician at that and a composer, and I know that you've brought in some of his music that we're going to end our show on.
00:53:42.500
Can you tell us something about your husband and his music?
00:53:48.500
Yes, well, so his name is Ken Berman, and you're going to listen to an as-it unreleased song called "It's Over," which is not about our relationship.
00:54:00.500
Oh, that's about our show.
00:54:03.500
Our show today, probably, which is from a CD album to be released in air-fool called "In Mind," and he's a pianist and composer.
00:54:12.500
And you lift with me in Paris in this fall, so we did continue the tradition of the American artist going to Paris for inspiration.
00:54:20.500
How did you like it?
00:54:21.500
He loved it.
00:54:22.500
He loved it.
00:54:23.500
And the jazz in Paris is really transcend.
00:54:25.500
Yeah, that's another thing we haven't know.
00:54:27.500
We could talk about the jazz and the blues.
00:54:29.500
Yes, and also...
00:54:30.500
Yeah, so Jean-Man, for sure.
00:54:32.500
Yes, there's this whole other aspect of Paris.
00:54:35.500
Is he learning French?
00:54:37.500
We're trying.
00:54:38.500
Yeah, okay.
00:54:40.500
So we're going to listen to a song called "It's Over" on a CD of his...
00:54:45.500
Yes, called "In Mind."
00:54:47.500
"In Mind."
00:54:48.500
Yes, to be released in April, by King of Herman.
00:54:51.500
Thank you, Brian.
00:54:52.500
So before we turn to that, thanks again for coming on.
00:54:54.500
So, I want to remind our listeners that we have a web page for this program.
00:54:58.500
If you log into the Stanford's French and Italian department's home page, click on entitled "Pinions."
00:55:07.500
There you can access all our previous shows.
00:55:10.500
There's about 30 of them, or close to 30 by now.
00:55:14.500
You can also leave your comments, look for our shows also in the iTunes store.
00:55:20.500
And I don't know if we're going to be with you next week due to baseball, but we'll see with the weather being on the show.
00:55:27.500
We may well be with you next week, otherwise we'll be with you the week after that.
00:55:34.500
Thank you again.
00:55:36.500
Bye-bye.
00:55:37.500
Thank you.
00:55:38.500
[Music]
00:55:48.500
[Music]
00:55:52.500
[Music]
00:55:58.500
[Music]
00:56:02.500
[Music]
00:56:08.500
[Music]
00:56:12.500
[Music]
00:56:16.500
[Music]
00:56:20.500
[Music]
00:56:24.500
[Music]
00:56:28.500
[Music]
00:56:32.500
[Music]
00:56:36.500
[Music]
00:56:40.500
[Music]
00:56:44.500
[Music]
00:56:48.500
[Music]
00:56:52.500
[Music]
00:56:56.500
[Music]
00:57:00.500
[Music]
00:57:04.500
[Music]
00:57:08.500
[Music]
00:57:12.500
[Music]
00:57:16.500
[Music]
00:57:20.500
[Music]
00:57:24.500
[Music]
00:57:28.500
[Music]
00:57:32.500
[Music]
00:57:36.500
[Music]
00:57:40.500
[Music]
00:57:44.500
[Music]
00:57:48.500
[Music]
00:57:52.500
[Music]
00:57:56.500
[Music]
00:58:00.500
[Music]
00:58:04.500
[Music]
00:58:08.500
[Music]
00:58:12.500
[Music]
00:58:16.500
[Music]
00:58:20.500
[Music]
00:58:26.500
[Music]
00:58:30.500
[Music]
00:58:34.500
[Music]
00:58:38.500
[Music]
00:58:42.500
[Music]
00:58:46.500
[Music]
00:58:50.500
[Music]
00:58:54.500
[Music]
00:58:58.500
[Music]
00:59:02.500
[Music]
00:59:06.500
[Music]
00:59:10.500
[Music]
00:59:14.500
[Music]
00:59:18.500
[Music]
00:59:22.500
[Music]
00:59:26.500
[Music]
00:59:30.500
[Music]
00:59:34.500
[Music]
00:59:38.500
[Music]
00:59:44.500
[Music]
00:59:48.500
[Music]
00:59:52.500
[Music]
00:59:58.500
[Music]
01:00:02.500
[Music]
01:00:06.500
[Music]
01:00:10.500
[Music]
01:00:14.500
[Music]
01:00:18.500
[Music]
01:00:28.500
[Music]
01:00:32.500
[Music]
01:00:36.500
[Music]
01:00:42.500
[Music]
01:00:46.500
[Music]
01:00:50.500
[Music]
01:00:54.500
[Music]
01:00:58.500
[Music]
01:01:02.500
[Music]
01:01:12.500
[Music]
01:01:16.500
[Music]
01:01:22.500
[Music]
01:01:32.500
[Music]
01:01:36.500
[Music]
01:01:42.500
[Music]
01:01:56.500
[Music]
01:01:58.500
.