table of contents

06/05/2007

Stephen Hinton on Kurt Weill- Part 2

Stephen Hinton is Professor of Music and Senior Associate Dean for the Humanities at Stanford University, where he has been on the faculty since 1994; from 1997-2004 he served as chairman of the Department of Music. After studying at the University of Birmingham (U.K.), where he took both a double major in Music and German […]

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:03.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:05.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:07.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:09.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:11.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:13.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:15.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:17.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:19.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:21.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:23.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:25.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:27.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:29.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:31.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:33.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:35.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:37.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:39.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:41.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:43.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:45.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:47.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:49.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:51.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:53.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:55.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:57.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:00:59.000
[MUSIC PLAYING]
00:01:25.000
Welcome back to entitled opinions on KZSU Stanford.
00:01:29.000
This is our second segment of our conversation with Professor
00:01:33.000
Steven Hinton from the Music Department here at Stanford and our first segment.
00:01:37.000
If you were with us, you heard us discussing the career of Kurt Vile.
00:01:43.000
And what we heard there is Mack the Knife, perhaps one of his most famous compositions or songs.
00:01:50.000
And I'll ask now our guest Steven Hinton if that is indeed the case.
00:01:56.000
But first, let me reintroduce and Steven, welcome to the program again.
00:02:00.000
Thank you very much, Robert.
00:02:01.000
I'm delighted to be back.
00:02:03.000
So is Mack the Knife Kurt Vile's signature piece, would you call it?
00:02:09.000
It's the signature song from the signature piece.
00:02:13.000
It's a tune that became extremely popular in the 1950s, above all, with a revival of Kurt Vile's
00:02:23.000
best known theater piece, the Three-Penny Opera.
00:02:26.000
In the 1920s, there were other contenders for that distinction.
00:02:33.000
But nonetheless was pretty impressively important at the time.
00:02:37.000
Added to the show at the last minute to satisfy the vanity of the leading male singer in the Three-Penny Opera.
00:02:45.000
So it nearly didn't make its way into the show.
00:02:48.000
But once it did, its popularity has just been on the increase.
00:02:53.000
And I guess the apotheosis of its popularity was a McDonald's commercial.
00:02:59.000
A number of years ago where Mr. Moon was sitting at his piano and saying or rather singing,
00:03:06.000
"Eat Big Mac Tonight."
00:03:09.000
But that wasn't Mr. Moon singing there, that was better all breath to himself.
00:03:13.000
We actually had a rather wonderful voice.
00:03:17.000
We might hear that in a bit.
00:03:20.000
But I suppose Louis Armstrong, we have to hear the remake of that Mac the Knife, no?
00:03:26.000
Well, I think we should.
00:03:28.000
Following breast rendition that we just heard, I think Louis Armstrong illustrates something that we talked about in the last hour,
00:03:35.000
which is the remarkable ability of cut-vile songs to appeal to a whole range of performers.
00:03:42.000
And here's such more.
00:03:44.000
Big man, there goes Mac the Knife.
00:03:47.000
[Music]
00:03:57.000
[Music]
00:04:01.000
[Music]
00:04:05.000
[Music]
00:04:09.000
[Music]
00:04:13.000
[Music]
00:04:17.000
[Music]
00:04:22.000
[Music]
00:04:31.000
[Music]
00:04:35.000
[Music]
00:04:39.000
[Music]
00:04:42.000
[Music]
00:04:47.000
[Music]
00:04:57.000
[Music]
00:05:01.000
[Music]
00:05:07.000
[Music]
00:05:15.000
[Music]
00:05:21.000
So, Stephen, we promised our listeners that we would open up our conversation in the second segment to, you know, broader issues about music in the 20th century, so called serious music.
00:05:34.000
And continuing with the place that Kurt Vile has in the history of music, I know that one of his staunch supporters and biographers,
00:05:44.000
David Drew called him one of the great might have been in the history of music. Now what did David Drew mean when you call it Kurt Vile, one of the great might have been.
00:06:00.000
[Music]
00:06:03.000
I guess that's the kind of backhanded compliment in a way, isn't it, because our last hour was all about the very significant presence that Kurt Vile has in the musical world of the
00:06:13.000
20th century. But as far as his place in music history narrowly defined is concerned, I think that place has shifted quite a bit. When Drew began his pioneering work on Vile in the 1950s, he got to know
00:06:30.000
Lottie Lenia quite well and one of her husbands. This was a time when Kurt Vile had no place in music history. And for Vile to have had a place in music history, he would have had to have developed in a rather different way. We talked in the last hour about how he might have gone to study with Schoenberg.
00:06:53.000
And I suppose an element of the might have been in Drew's mind is the might have been a student of Schoenberg, might have become an Albert Berg or an Anton Vayburn, the member of the so-called second Viennese school of composition which played such a very central role in the writing of music history in the 20th century. One could of course say it played a role in 20th century music.
00:07:21.000
But to qualify that and say played a role in the writing of music history in the 20th century is to qualify the significance of the second Viennese school because I think that has shifted as well. And when Drew was writing in the 1950s, Schoenberg's reputation was writing extremely high. And that of his pupils as well.
00:07:44.000
Vile had not been one of his pupils in the kind of music he was doing just didn't fit into that narrative.
00:07:52.000
Well, I did a show last year with my brother Thomas Harrison who published a book a few years back on the year 1910.
00:08:00.000
Subtitled The Emancipation of Disney's and I know that that's a note.
00:08:03.000
That book is known well to you. And we've talked about this particular moment around the year 1910 with this sort of intent.
00:08:13.000
This sort of intense expressionism in the visual arts and music and perhaps even philosophy. And of course I'm remembering that there are more than one Schoenberg.
00:08:25.000
There's the expressionist Schoenberg and then after a while he reverts back to more traditional forms.
00:08:32.000
So when you say that in the 1950s and the writing of the history of music, Schoenberg was writing very high, which Schoenberg was it exactly was it the 12th-Tone Schoenberg or the subsequent more docile Schoenberg?
00:08:51.000
I think it was both following reason. I think the model for many post-war composers was Anton Vayburn, his pupil who had adopted an adapted Schoenberg's method of composing with 12 turns, which was something that he developed in the 1920s.
00:09:14.000
I'm sorry to be this kind of basic, but what is 12-tone music?
00:09:20.000
12-tone music is music that is composed using collections of all 12 chromatic pitches.
00:09:32.000
And there's a fairly complicated set of not exactly rules, but set of methods for composing in this way.
00:09:45.000
The basic approach is that the composer devises some pre-ordained constellation of pitches known as a set or series.
00:09:57.000
This is sometimes called serial composition. And depending on which notes are next to which notes.
00:10:05.000
So, depending on the actual order of the pitches, the intervals that they have, whether they are particularly consonant intervals or more dissonant intervals, that in turn will determine the character of the music quite significantly.
00:10:24.000
But the method of composing with 12 turns that Schoenberg developed in the 1920s really grew out of a crisis in the composition of music in musical language precipitated by what is called atonality, which is the musical language that Schoenberg was using around 1910.
00:10:51.000
The emancipation of dissonance, in other words, happens in two stages. One, traditional dissonances are not resolved into consonances and thereby retain a very expressive power in the music around 1910.
00:11:09.000
And then in 1923, after Schoenberg had gone fairly fallow in his composition and everything had become rather short-winded in his music, he started devising ways of composing more extended compositions by, in a sense, creating a new first practice of musical counterpoint.
00:11:36.000
He had used dissonances, expressively, the unresolved, the emancipated dissonances. When he spoke of the emancipation of dissonance proper in the 1920s, he was referring to the way in which he could combine the notes of the series with one another and control hermetically as it were, all of their relations through the
00:12:05.980
devising of 12 turns series. So in a way it's a much more controlled, formalistic approach to the earlier, very expressive expressionist as it was called approach of the early music.
00:12:21.980
Well, perhaps we could hear something by Schoenberg, this piece that you brought in for us, what is it that we're going to hear now from his?
00:12:32.980
So what we're going to hear now is a piece called "Evatong" or "Expectation" from 1909, and this is really the text book, "Aeternal Peace."
00:12:46.980
If you think that late Wagner is fairly dissonant, this takes it to another level. This is what is called a mono drama. It is a piece with one person in this case, a woman who just like in the expressionist plays at the time, is simply referred to as "deaf how" the woman.
00:13:09.980
Well, those expressionist plays "deaf son" or "Harsenklaver" for example.
00:13:15.980
Well, I'm glad you brought up the screen, because this is a great way of thinking about this piece. Everyone has an image of the screen, and in many ways what we're seeing there is the extrusion of emotion, a very intense emotion, and we certainly hear that.
00:13:37.980
I read recently however, and I don't know whether you saw this, that Munk, when he explained that painting, wasn't referring to the individual who was screaming, but the nature around him that was producing this sound, which we typically in music history associate not with expressionism, the extrusion of emotion from an individual, but with impressionism, with the painting of nature through sound.
00:14:06.980
So we associate that more with Debussy than Schoenberg. What we have in this wonderful piece by Schoenberg is a woman entering a forest, and I know that you're an authority on forests. She enters a forest and stumbles over, well she's not sure what she stumbles over, but then she realizes it's a dead body, and what we don't really find out is whether it's the dead body of her lover,
00:14:35.980
whom she seems to have lost. Schoenberg described the piece as the experience of a second stretched into 30 minutes, so the whole intensity of experience of a moment, a moment of shock and horror, which is explored here, not just through the atonal vocal line of the protagonist, the woman,
00:15:02.980
but also by the colouristic exploration of the sound of the forest, so the forest around her, like in the Munk painting, is also screaming.
00:15:14.980
It's also screaming, and that can also be the sound of the unconscious as well as the surrounding nature.
00:15:19.980
Well I think that's exactly right. This was one of Adorno's favourite pieces of music. This for him was the paradigm of informal music, music which was produced by some kind of expressive necessity, while at the same time giving voice to the alienated individual, and he invokes this piece so many times in his writings about music, as if the whole of music history was challenged after the composition of Earth.
00:15:48.980
This was the moment of Adorno's youth where he felt that music had really reached a great high point, and he never really felt that it progressed beyond this in a satisfactory way.
00:16:08.980
I don't know refer to this in his philosophy of new music, the seminal text and one that certainly influenced a lot of people in the 1950s, he referred to this as psychological protocols, as if the composer were taking down what's going on in the subjects unconscious.
00:16:32.980
He likened the music to expressionist painting, which he said really amounts to, he caused it in the philosophy of new music, nude portraits of the brain.
00:16:46.980
So it's a society civilisation without its clothes on, as it were. This is the bare essence of the modern individual.
00:16:56.980
Well, let's get it to listen.
00:16:59.980
[Music]
00:17:06.980
[Music]
00:17:13.980
[Music]
00:17:20.980
[Music]
00:17:27.980
[Music]
00:17:54.980
[Music]
00:18:04.980
[Music]
00:18:14.980
[Music]
00:18:22.980
[Music]
00:18:32.980
[Music]
00:18:42.980
[Music]
00:18:50.980
[Music]
00:18:58.980
It's continuous of course composed in the Wagnerian manner in that sense, it's hard to find a cut-off point.
00:19:04.980
[Music]
00:19:06.980
It's quite a distinction with Kurt Vial now, or what we were hearing earlier.
00:19:12.980
It absolutely is, and the idiom is probably familiar to people who've seen a lot of horror movies.
00:19:20.980
Bernard Herman, a number of other composers David Raxson, who studied with Schoenberg,
00:19:28.980
employed this style of atonal composition in moments of great psychological intensity.
00:19:34.980
So I think quite familiar in film music, indeed Schoenberg himself wrote music in this style called
00:19:46.980
"A Complement to an Imaginary Movie".
00:19:50.980
Well, can I ask a personal naive question about musical taste, because in my original lead-in to our first segment,
00:20:00.980
a looting, I guess to a manual, that judgments of taste are judgments where you say that what appeals to me,
00:20:09.980
personally or subjectively, must appeal universally, but we know that that's not the case.
00:20:14.980
And I believe that things like poetry and music must have a healthy dose of the pleasure principle,
00:20:24.980
pervading them if they are going to survive and thrive, culturally speaking.
00:20:30.980
And do you take pleasure listening to Schoenberg?
00:20:36.980
In the same way you would take pleasure of listening to Kurt Vial or other forms of music.
00:20:42.980
If I take pleasure in it, it's a different form of pleasure, I'm sure.
00:20:50.980
I think it depends a lot on the performance as well, but are you suggesting that you do not take pleasure?
00:20:57.980
I'm suggesting that for a minute or two in a movie where there's a very dramatic moment that calls for highly expressive tense anxiety, written music like that,
00:21:11.980
that's fine, but I don't think I would settle back and listen to more than a few minutes of it with pleasure.
00:21:19.980
But that's certainly due to my lack of proper education, I'm sure.
00:21:26.980
Well, as a music historian, I'm inclined to look at this very much in a historical context as well.
00:21:33.980
And one way of thinking about this music is the kind of sonic analogy to expression is painting.
00:21:41.980
And if you think of Schoenberg's great friend, Vasily Kandinsky, around this time, his paintings are teetering on the brink of abstraction without actually being abstract paintings.
00:21:55.980
And I think this is what's going on with Schoenberg's music that he's piling on the musical equivalent of representational techniques.
00:22:05.980
In other words, expressive techniques, using all kinds of musical conventions, but it sounds quite unconventional because of the intensity.
00:22:16.980
And then like Kandinsky's music, which increasingly becomes abstract, Schoenberg begins to compose in a much more abstract manner.
00:22:30.980
And that is the transition to this 12-ton technique. But it's not entirely divorced from his early approach.
00:22:38.980
You know, in the same way that Kandinsky's abstract paintings seem like sublimated versions of the earlier paintings.
00:22:46.980
So individual shapes become almost geometric shapes, in literally geometric shapes, in some Kandinsky paintings.
00:22:55.980
So you have in Schoenberg's music these gestures of expressivity that are piled on in an almost intolerable intensity becoming sublimated in the very controlled figures of 12-ton music.
00:23:10.980
Now, for court-vial, there was some kind of historical necessity in his musical education in that he was tuning in to Schoenberg and really is considered seriously going into the same thing.
00:23:24.980
Schoenberg wanted him to go to Vienna, recognized his talent, and the early 1920s in court-vials career include a number of pieces that are written in an atonal style.
00:23:40.980
But he quickly abandons that style. And I think for him, being of this later generation, the generation born around 1900, he could have in his music gone one time.
00:23:53.980
He could have liked Schoenberg's pupils embraced the 12-ton method. And we should probably listen to a little bit of that to get a sense of what that music sounds like.
00:24:04.980
Or he could have done what a lot of artists did around that time is to think about the role of art in the new democracy, in the new Weimar Republic, and find ways of applying his musical talents to explore the music that he was doing.
00:24:22.980
He was very much caught up at the beginning of the Weimar Republic in that kind of revolutionary fervor. He could have taken him to Vienna. He could have ended up a 12-ton composer, but he took a completely different path.
00:24:50.980
I must say a path that in many ways was fairly characteristic for that younger generation. Even Schoenberg's pupil, Alban Berg, who was a little bit older, the vile used to sneak in to performances of the three-penny opera.
00:25:06.980
He could make up his mind, whether the likes of us, I'm quoting him most literally, should be composing a $10,000 symphony or a three-penny opera.
00:25:19.980
So it's really a question of whether he would have gone in the direction of become an avant-garde composer, or not become an avant-garde composer, which he wasn't.
00:25:32.980
That's exactly right. And his initial career was spent going to the avant-garde music festivals. And that's why he ended up at Baden, where they were expecting him to do something experimental in the world of musical theater.
00:25:48.980
And his experiment was precisely with the popular, something that he increasingly embraced in his career.
00:25:56.980
And I think in retrospect, this is my own entitled opinion, or perhaps not even entitled, but that he was on the winning side of the equation.
00:26:05.980
Yeah, he was. But when Drew said that he was a great mind of being, he temporarily, as far as music historians were concerned, was on the losing side.
00:26:16.980
But maybe we could listen to something that was composed in the very same year as the three-penny opera in 1928 by Anton von Vayburn, the third member of the second V&E school after Schoenberg and Berg.
00:26:37.980
This is a set of piano variations composed using the strict 12-tone method of composition.
00:26:45.980
And I think you will hear quite readily here that the kinds of dissonances that we were hearing in a Vartong are certainly prevalent.
00:26:54.980
We're not hearing major thirds or minor thirds, we're hearing lots of minor seconds and major sevens.
00:27:03.980
The vocabulary is dissonant, but there's an almost classical balance and crystalline beauty to the piano writing here.
00:27:15.980
[Music]
00:27:41.980
[Music]
00:28:05.980
[Music]
00:28:34.980
That is very beautiful, I'd say it's very pure at the same time as you were saying crystalline.
00:28:39.980
Yes, yes. And the favour more than Schoenberg in the 1950s when Drew was writing was the figure who young composers were seeing as the model where they were left off, that's where they were taking things up and creating after the second world war, a very exclusive form of avant-garde.
00:29:03.980
And Vile was completely out of that picture.
00:29:07.980
He just died, but he died as a composer on Broadway.
00:29:12.980
Where does John Cage fit into these two options?
00:29:17.980
Is he someone who very clearly follows in the Schoenberg line?
00:29:23.980
It's funny you should mention Cage because he studied with Schoenberg in UCLA and Schoenberg referred to him for a cage as a great inventor, not a composer.
00:29:40.980
And in the 1950s Cage took the German music festivals by Storm because he in many ways was somebody who was an earthertition of music.
00:29:57.980
And for many people it's Cage's writings rather than his compositions that are important.
00:30:05.980
The experiments that he engaged in, for example, writing a silent piece.
00:30:15.980
That's an interesting invention, but is it a composition?
00:30:18.980
I think that Schoenberg was referring to that kind of ingenuity in Cage or composing a piece called Water Music that involves literally somebody pouring water.
00:30:29.980
In other words, engaging in what later will become quite well known as happenings.
00:30:36.980
Cage was very much somebody who was challenging the traditions of Western music, but still at the same time feeling as though he was very much contributing to them as well.
00:30:48.980
You were speaking earlier about the way in which music history was written in, I guess, around the mid-century, in the centuries.
00:30:57.980
And it sounded to me like you were suggesting that the narrative was very narrow compared to all the kinds of things that were happening musically outside of the narrative.
00:31:13.980
And that there was academically speaking it could not make enough room to include this wild diversity of especially more popular forms of music.
00:31:26.980
That's exactly right.
00:31:29.980
I know we were talking about this recently, and I told you about my interest in different versions of the same textbook.
00:31:39.980
So what I brought along with me today to illustrate how the ground has really shifted quite radically in the last half-century.
00:31:50.980
I've brought along the first edition of a very famous music history textbook.
00:31:55.980
It was a textbook that I used as an undergraduate myself, and it really hadn't been revised very much when I got to use it in the 1970s.
00:32:05.980
And I've also brought along the latest edition of that, the seventh edition.
00:32:11.980
And I think this in a very drastic way illustrates the issues that I'm referring to.
00:32:17.980
So perhaps we could talk first of all about the first edition.
00:32:24.980
Here we go. This is the very last page of Donald J. Grant's History of Western Music from 1950.
00:32:33.980
The year of curt-vile dies, yes.
00:32:35.980
So it's probably written in 1949.
00:32:39.980
The ideal of art for everyone has degenerated to dictatorial regulation of style,
00:32:46.980
or the production of huge masses of cheap commercial entertainment music.
00:32:53.980
Continuity of tradition has been menaced by both the possibility of its defenders and the intransigence of the takers.
00:33:02.980
Schundag and Vayburn acknowledged tradition, but some of their younger disciples seem determined to annihilate the last vestiges of it.
00:33:12.980
Individual freedom has been pushed to the point where composers have become alienated from the majority of potential listeners.
00:33:21.980
And consequently, have written music of a subjective or esoteric nature capable of being understood only by a little circle of initiates.
00:33:31.980
However, the conflicts that are now apparent in 20th century musical practice and theory will doubt this eventually be resolved or transformed.
00:33:40.980
Just as the conflicts of the hours know, the Nuevo Muzike, these are earlier periods of music history in the medieval period,
00:33:52.980
and in the late Renaissance early Baroque, and the Brahms Wagner era were.
00:33:59.980
Every period of music has had its currents and countercurrents.
00:34:04.980
Every composer has had to take from his environment what he needed, reject what he could not use,
00:34:09.980
and restate to his contemporaries the eternal truth of music as he himself has been able to comprehend it.
00:34:17.980
So it's about eternal truth, but the options are very narrow there.
00:34:21.980
I somehow wish he had ended it without that last paragraph because I really liked what you were reading up until the however,
00:34:30.980
but it seems as if he didn't have the courage of his convictions to say that the individualism of composers has gone to great accesses,
00:34:39.980
that there's this scorn for listeners, for the majority.
00:34:44.980
There's an anti-democratic, certainly an anti-democratic strain.
00:34:48.980
And yet it seems with this last paragraph he's trying to do some damage control and say,
00:34:54.980
"Well, every composer, every individual has to find his own path and use what he needs and not use what he doesn't need."
00:35:02.980
I think he's backtrack.
00:35:03.980
I think he's having to tackle the paradox of writing a history of revolutions,
00:35:08.980
and trying to preserve the innovations as part of a tradition of innovations,
00:35:16.980
if you like, grout studied at Harvard University, and they have a wonderful concert hall.
00:35:23.980
They're called Pain Hall. It was built in 1913.
00:35:26.980
I don't know whether you've ever been there, but they have a freeze that goes around the building inside.
00:35:35.980
And right above where the conductors' head would be in a concert is the name Beethoven.
00:35:43.980
And then all these other names go around with the increasing order of importance until the back of the hall.
00:35:50.980
And I think what grout's textbook does is to give you a version of the freeze in Pain Hall.
00:35:58.980
The grout history textbook has only one chapter that is devoted to a single composer,
00:36:05.980
and guess who that composer is, Beethoven, of course.
00:36:09.980
And these other composers, Schoenberg and Beethoven, are being added here, maybe at the back of the hall still,
00:36:17.980
but nonetheless to the pantheon of great composers.
00:36:20.980
I take that, "Vile is not mentioned in this edition, first edition, or he is."
00:36:26.980
No, they basically end with Beethoven.
00:36:30.980
Yeah.
00:36:31.980
And so they don't even mention the composers who are taking their cue from Beethoven in the 1950s.
00:36:36.980
He's not ready to see how they actually fit into musical tradition.
00:36:42.980
And of course, in subsequent editions there are a number of revisions, appendices, or qualifications.
00:36:51.980
Total rewrites.
00:36:53.980
For something utterly completely different one should go to the end of the latest edition.
00:37:01.980
The seventh edition published just a couple of years ago.
00:37:05.980
The last page begins, "It is too early to know what music from the late 20th century or early 21st century will be remembered, performed, and listened to in the future,
00:37:14.980
or will influence later music.
00:37:16.980
Trends change too quickly to give a balanced or complete overview of recent music.
00:37:21.980
But it seems clear that there is a continuing tension in all types of music between finding a niche of committed listeners,
00:37:28.980
whose support will endure, and finding a wide audience.
00:37:32.980
There are few pieces that everyone knows, perhaps national anthems and film music, come closest to providing the shared musical experiences that seem to have been more common in the past.
00:37:44.980
The immediate success in enduring place enjoyed by Beethoven in orchestral music,
00:37:50.980
Verde in Opera, Duke Ellington in Jazz, or the Beethoven's in popular music no longer seems possible for musicians working today,
00:37:59.980
because the audience is so divided that such unanimity of opinion is likely to be achieved.
00:38:06.980
And I'll go down a bit, it says,
00:38:08.980
"The choices we have for music to hear and perform have become almost limitless.
00:38:13.980
So too are the possibilities for new music, with new computer software and the collage approach found in both classical and rat-ph MUSIC.
00:38:19.980
It is now possible for all of us, with access to technology to make our own music, without performance training.
00:38:29.980
In some respects, we are surrounded by more music than we can ever consume.
00:38:35.980
But perhaps we are also returning to something akin to the condition of music long ago,
00:38:41.980
when every singer sang his or her own song."
00:38:46.980
Now that is quite a shift.
00:38:49.980
Now there is certainly a place for court violin there, but also for all those interpreters of court violin singing their own song that we've spoken about.
00:38:58.980
It sounds like academic music history is unraveling there, that the categories that have traditionally sustained the understanding of the history of music just are so bewildered by the phenomena themselves,
00:39:15.980
a musical phenomena that seems like an internal collapse of the very categorization that such a encyclopedia of music is intended to provide.
00:39:25.980
I think that's absolutely right.
00:39:27.980
There's no history in the singular of music, and even the concept of the history of music is completely relativised here.
00:39:38.980
I think the poor grout, his history of music, can scarcely survive under the weight of all these what you might call post-modern qualifications.
00:39:50.980
One, there are two figures I would like to quare you about. One is Travinsky.
00:39:57.980
But first, I'd like to go back to Adorno whom you mentioned earlier.
00:40:02.980
His highly academic, snobbish concept of what music, serious music should be, and his phobia about any sort of contamination of pure music with especially consumer demand and popular culture.
00:40:26.980
He must have had a very ambiguous assessment of a composer like Kurt Vial.
00:40:34.980
Absolutely. In a way, the 1950 edition of grout that I quoted where they say the ideal of art for everyone has degenerated to dictatorial regulation of style or the production of huge masses of cheap commercial entertainment music is a digest of Adorno's attitude to music.
00:40:55.980
This is an attitude that certainly changed over the years, but it became sharpened in the post-war period with the appearance of the book that I referred to already, very influential book for all kinds of people, critics, scholars, composers, the philosophy of new music,
00:41:20.980
where even the music of Stravinsky in that book was considered to be in kahoots in a way with the forces of reaction and restoration.
00:41:33.980
So Schoenberg is the progressive historical force, Vayburn in some ways even more. Stravinsky is considered somebody who for various reasons on the side of...
00:41:51.980
Well, the whole book is conceived as what he calls an "excursus to the dialectic of enlightenment".
00:42:00.980
And so we have the forces of progress and the forces of reaction and Stravinsky has the very unfortunate assignment of illustrating the latter tendency.
00:42:11.980
Do you agree with that? No. Not at all.
00:42:16.980
I think the whole model is rather bogus. I'm very interested in Adorno because he was such an influential historical figure and I'm very interested in his writings on music because he was so superbly knowledgeable.
00:42:34.980
And there's a lot of critical insight there, but I think his theories are extremely problematic indeed.
00:42:40.980
As far as his relationship with Kurt Vayler is concerned, they knew each other quite well in the 1920s.
00:42:47.980
Adorno was a music critic felt that he should be supportive of what Vayler was doing, but even then had trouble doing so.
00:42:56.980
We started with Mac De Nye from Three Peni Opera. Adorno wrote a fairly famous and notorious review of Three Peni Opera where he declared its popularity to be based on a misunderstanding.
00:43:09.980
In other words, the snobbishness was shining right through there. He understood it and the notion was that if people liked it, they were liking it for the wrong reasons.
00:43:19.980
Yes, my deeply rooted animosity towards Adorno has now been reactivated when I hear a quote like that.
00:43:30.980
The utter snobbism and scorn of the individual.
00:43:37.980
On what basis could he assume that he knew better than the people who loved that opera?
00:43:44.980
Yes, and I think his snobbism only got worse and it also acquired a fairly heavy dose of anti-Americanism when he came to this country and was writing vehemently against the so-called culture industry.
00:43:59.980
By that time he had been an apologist if you liked for Cook Vial and with friends like that, etc, etc.
00:44:10.980
But in the 1950s, Vial had just been completely in Adorno's views subsumed by the culture industry.
00:44:18.980
If you look at a lot of Adorno's writings where he grounds his own musical experiences,
00:44:27.980
it's a little bit like his championing of Evartong. He refers a lot to the authentic experience of his youth.
00:44:35.980
And there's something about his particular kind of bourgeois upbringing that informed his musical sensibilities.
00:44:43.980
And he never forsook that. He really saw his childhood as in some ways the most authentic thing.
00:44:51.980
And he's not the only one that it's a very recurrent sort of syndrome.
00:44:57.980
A moment of authenticity followed by a fall into authenticity.
00:45:02.980
Yeah, well, in a way that is a microcosm of his historical...
00:45:10.980
If the macrocosm of history that the Frankfurt School has a tendency to see in terms of music around 1780 having reached a point of perfection.
00:45:23.980
Just for a brief moment, it was possible to write something like the Magic Flute where high and low came together where there was a universal musical language, etc, etc.
00:45:34.980
And after that, history went to the dogs.
00:45:37.980
And what I don't understand about these Marxists, lofty Marxists like Adorno and Virto Brecht is, in Adorno's case, he's so anti-demotic and anti-populous.
00:45:53.980
And it's fine to be anti-culture industry and consumers, culture and so forth, but something like those idioms that you were talking about in our first segment that Kurt Viles so creatively,
00:46:06.980
we appropriated from popular music, Phocht, Jaz, Ragtime, all these things.
00:46:15.980
How can one be so disdainfully in regard to that, and consider that contamination?
00:46:22.980
Well, I don't want to lapse too much into biography here, but in both Brecht's case and Adorno's case, it is interesting to learn in Brecht's case, for example,
00:46:34.980
that in a way he was a recovering music lover, that he had been absolutely enamored of music and then spent the rest of his life trying to overcome his addiction to music.
00:46:46.980
In Adorno's case, although he wrote music criticism which was very much in accord with his critical theory, in private, he really loved Jaz music and used to perform it at home on the piano.
00:47:01.980
So it was his dirty secret.
00:47:05.980
You also told me something about the relationship between Brecht and Vile, which struck me as very true to my somewhat suspicious attitude towards Brecht, which is the extraordinary imbalance in terms of the royalty percentages that he insisted on did Brecht,
00:47:24.980
where he was getting the big bulk of the royalties, like 65%, then Kurt Vile was getting 25% for having written all these beautiful music, without which none of these pieces would have had nearly the popularity that they did have.
00:47:39.980
What's that all about?
00:47:43.980
Yeah, we're into equality.
00:47:46.980
Yeah, well, the social justice.
00:47:49.980
So while Kurt Vile was getting 25% of the royalties, Brecht was getting 65% of the royalties until Elizabeth Helpman got some also for the translation until somebody filed a plagiarism suit against Brecht for having used the German translation of some text by Vile that were inserted into the 3-pinny opera.
00:48:13.980
So Brecht actually lost that one and had to seed some of the royalties to the translator of the Vile.
00:48:22.980
It all ended up rather nicely because the translation of the translator did rather well from the popularity, even though he was just getting a few percent, he was doing very well from the popularity of the 3-pinny opera.
00:48:35.980
With the proceedings, bought a vineyard in Austria and produced a wine called 3-pinny drops.
00:48:44.980
But yes, the principle was that Brecht made the money where he could, and there's a poem of his, says, "How can one be friendly and unfriendly time?"
00:48:56.980
So he almost was justifying his appalling behaviour by referring to the condition of society.
00:49:04.980
But as we were saying in the last segment, "The Power of Love" that Kurt Vile believed in, I think it's of a different order than alienation, defamiliarization, and this sort of assault on the sensibility.
00:49:20.980
Yes, I think Brecht is always warning about being seduced and keeping cool.
00:49:28.980
I don't think Vile has the same kind of fear of that.
00:49:34.980
So, Stephen, we got to 1950, this is the year in which Vile dies, and you read from the recent 7th edition of the music history about all the kinds of things that have been going on since then in the sphere of music.
00:49:55.980
Do you see any way of telling a more or less coherent story of what happened in the latter half of the 20th century in so-called high cultural music forms?
00:50:06.980
Or does it all splinter into an impossible array of individual styles and experimentations?
00:50:19.980
It's really hard when you don't have the benefit of considerable hindsight or when you aren't overlooking history from a relatively great height to discern the principal contours.
00:50:37.980
It seems to me that there have been some significant changes after about 1960 towards what one might call a pluralism of styles where composers don't feel any more that kind of dictate of history.
00:51:00.980
This is typically called postmodernism and that would be a very blanket way of describing various trends.
00:51:08.980
One of those trends has been very much the reaction against what we might call the maximal approach of composition I'm using a term which has been discussed at Great Length by my colleague at Berkeley, Richard Tauruskin, who has written a history of Western music up to the present.
00:51:29.980
What he sees as a reaction against maximism is a minimalism, but nonetheless a minimalism that's very aware of itself of making a historical contribution.
00:51:44.980
Where I suspect our perspective has changed quite a bit is that the kind of music history that growl to a company who has written up to this point has always been accompanied by an anthology of music.
00:52:02.980
That is to say by a literate tradition of serious music defined as music that is transmitted through notation written down by the composer and then transmitted to later generations through the ages.
00:52:22.980
I think where my own discipline is going very much now is away from looking purely as music as text and much more music in cultural context and looking at the whole issue of performance with the singer singing his or her own song.
00:52:45.980
As we wrap up our show, I know that we want to hear for our Exodus the voice of Kurt Viled himself.
00:52:56.980
How much time do we have?
00:52:59.980
We have a couple of minutes before we play the tune.
00:53:02.980
Well, we should begin to wind down then.
00:53:05.980
There's a lot we haven't covered and I would have loved to have talked more about recent trends.
00:53:13.980
We cut that one rather short, but we should go back to Kurt Viled and wrap this up.
00:53:19.980
In the 1940s, when he was involved in these pieces, he was very much a collaborator working on these shows.
00:53:27.980
We talked about one touch of Venus and in some ways being a quintessential vial piece of dealing with the whole business of love in the modern world.
00:53:39.980
It's not exactly an outtake, but it is a spin-off of the production around this time vial actually got into a studio and recorded the song that we heard speak low when you speak love.
00:53:54.980
I think it conveys wonderfully here the warmth of Kurt Viled's personality.
00:54:02.980
He is singing the piece and he's also accompanying himself on the piano.
00:54:08.980
You can also feel the way that he is indulging in the romantic harmonious that he has adopted and adapted from 19th-century music and implanted into the context of
00:54:23.980
1940s New York musical theatre.
00:54:27.980
Before we hear that, though, I think you are coming on.
00:54:31.980
I really feel that I've learned a lot in these couple of hours, really.
00:54:35.980
I feel like I've discovered a new hero of Kurt Viled, about whom I knew many people vaguely that he was the origin of so many of these remakes by Louis Armstrong, the doors and so forth.
00:54:48.980
I feel that I now have a new star in my constellation.
00:54:55.980
That's wonderful discussion.
00:54:57.980
That's wonderful Robert.
00:54:58.980
I don't tire of championing Kurt Viled's cause and it's been a real pleasure to be on the show and to be for this once on the other side of the iPod.
00:55:08.980
That's good.
00:55:09.980
We're looking forward to your book on Kurt Viled when it does indeed get wrapped up soon.
00:55:14.980
This summer, I hope.
00:55:15.980
We'll be back in the summer this summer and then we published a reminding our listeners that we've been speaking with Stephen Hinton, a two-part show on modern music and Kurt Viled in particular.
00:55:25.980
Please tune in to entitled "Epinions Next Week."
00:55:29.980
Here we go with Kurt Viled singing his own tune.
00:55:33.980
[music]
00:55:43.980
When you speak alone, our summer day with us away, to soon, to soon, speak alone.
00:55:57.980
When you speak alone, our moment is with like ships at least.
00:56:05.980
We'll sweat the pothos.
00:56:09.980
Be close.
00:56:12.980
Darling, speak alone.
00:56:16.980
Love is the spark lost in the dark.
00:56:20.980
Who's so, who's so, I feel, wherever I go.
00:56:30.980
That tomorrow is near, tomorrow is here, and always to soon.
00:56:39.980
I'm his old and loved boy.
00:56:46.980
We'll be back in the summer, and we'll be back in the summer.
00:56:56.980
We'll be back in the summer, and we'll be back in the summer.
00:57:03.980
This and everything and who's so, who's so, I weigh.
00:57:13.980
Darling, I weigh.
00:57:17.980
Will you speak alone to me, be close to me, and soon.
00:57:28.980
[music]
00:57:38.980
[music]
00:57:48.980
[music]
00:57:58.980
[music]
00:58:24.980
[music]
00:58:34.980
[music]
00:58:44.980
[music]
00:59:04.980
[ilconized Noise]