table of contents

05/11/2016

Monika Greenleaf on Joseph Conrad's Polish Roots

Monika Greenleaf is a comparative literature scholar who teaches in the Department of Slavic and the Department of Comparative Literature here at Stanford. She is of Polish extraction herself and specializes in Polish and Russian literature. She is the author of Pushkin and Romantic Fashion as well as editor of Russian Subjects: Nation, Empire, and […]

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
This is KZSU Stanford.
00:00:03.000
Welcome to entitled opinions.
00:00:06.000
My name is Robert Harrison.
00:00:08.000
We're coming to you from the Stanford campus.
00:00:11.000
[music]
00:00:20.000
Does that hit the right note or what?
00:00:24.000
[music]
00:00:35.000
One of my favorite chapters in Robert Muziel's novel,
00:00:38.000
The Man Without Qualities, is called a chapter
00:00:41.000
that can be skipped by anyone who has no very high opinion of thinking.
00:00:46.000
The same goes for this radio program in titled opinions.
00:00:50.000
It can be skipped by anyone who does not have a very high regard for thinking, or for literary analysis,
00:00:58.000
or for reflective knowledge in general.
00:01:01.000
Why do we keep this show going?
00:01:03.000
Because the thoughtlessness of the age has no limit,
00:01:07.000
and as the darkness gets more thick and more complete all around us.
00:01:13.000
It's all the more necessary to keep a small fire going around which those of us who need it
00:01:19.000
can gather for conversation.
00:01:22.000
Conversation that gets its spark from the logos,
00:01:25.000
and not from what WB8's called an old bellows full of angry wind.
00:01:32.000
Those of you in this American Republic of ours, in Anno Domini 2016,
00:01:39.000
know what an old bellows full of angry wind means.
00:01:44.000
We'll know angry wind here on entitled opinions, a conversation about Joseph Conrad's coming up.
00:01:51.000
Stay tuned.
00:02:10.000
In the destructive element, E. Mers.
00:02:13.000
Here we are back in this little bark of ours that we can,
00:02:35.000
and we got sets forth on chartered and uncharted waters.
00:02:39.000
Never knowing in advance what surprises or adventures lie in store for us.
00:02:45.000
Today we are heading for the land of Joseph Conrad,
00:02:48.000
that Polish native who left home at age 17 to become a sailor,
00:02:53.000
joining the British merchant marine at age 21,
00:02:57.000
and eventually, after 15 years at sea,
00:03:00.000
giving up his maritime career to become a full-time writer.
00:03:04.000
The rest, as they say, is history for Conrad, who spoke English with a heavy Polish accent,
00:03:12.000
long after he obtained British citizenship in 1886,
00:03:16.000
would go on to become one of the 20th century's greatest British novelists.
00:03:22.000
I call him a British novelist because he wrote in English,
00:03:26.000
and was already a naturalized citizen when he embarked on his first book,
00:03:30.000
Al Myers-Folly, in the 1890s.
00:03:34.000
Along with J. A. Baker, Conrad gave us the most radiant English prose of the 20th century.
00:03:40.000
But in all frankness, I don't consider him an English writer.
00:03:44.000
There is very little in his sensibility and his prose style that strikes me as English
00:03:50.000
in the native sense of that term.
00:03:52.000
He read a lot more in French than he did in English, apparently.
00:03:58.000
When Conrad collaborated with the British writer, Ford made Oxford,
00:04:03.000
Ford would often get exasperated saying that Conrad would think and Polish,
00:04:08.000
rephrase his thought in French, and then translate it finally into English.
00:04:14.000
That sounds about right to me.
00:04:16.000
Who knows, in the end, maybe he was a Polish writer.
00:04:20.000
Late in his life, Conrad like to describe himself as "Pol Catholic and Gentlemen."
00:04:28.000
Is there something quintessentially Polish about his sensibility, his psyche,
00:04:33.000
his sublimely evocative prose, and maybe even his metaphysics?
00:04:38.000
I'm not qualified to answer that question, but fortunately, the guest who joins me in the studio today
00:04:44.000
is eminently entitled to opine about Conrad's Polish psyche or lack thereof.
00:04:51.000
Monika Greenleaf is a comparative literature scholar who teaches in the Department of Slavics
00:04:56.000
and the Department of Comparative Literature here at Stanford.
00:05:00.000
She is of Polish extraction herself and specializes in Polish and Russian literature.
00:05:06.000
She is the author of Pushkin and Romantic Fashion and the editor of Russian subjects,
00:05:12.000
nation empire, and the culture of Russia's Golden Age.
00:05:16.000
Her forthcoming book is called Amor Fatty, Hal Russian Theatre, Reconcives Time.
00:05:23.000
She is also published on the Polish poet and essayist Adam Mitzvich.
00:05:29.000
Monika has been my guest on two previous occasions, once for a show on Nabokov,
00:05:35.000
and more recently we did a show on Dostoevsky.
00:05:39.000
Both of them on the list of our all-time favorites, Monika, welcome back to entitled opinions.
00:05:44.000
Thank you.
00:05:45.000
Did I pronounce Adam Mitzvich?
00:05:48.000
Meets Kievich.
00:05:50.000
Got it.
00:05:52.000
So, going back to Conrad's self-definition, poll, Catholic, and gentlemen,
00:05:59.000
I don't know how seriously we should take that.
00:06:02.000
Conrad claimed to be an atheist after all, but from what you know about him,
00:06:06.000
did Conrad describe himself accurately when he called himself a poll, and in what sense was he
00:06:12.000
Polish up until the very end?
00:06:14.000
That's a really big question, and I wanted to,
00:06:19.000
oh, by the way, I just wanted to mention the rest is history,
00:06:22.000
but of course I was thinking the rest is silence, and both of those things are applicable to Joseph Conrad,
00:06:29.000
because there's a lot of history and a lot of it is really buried in what's practically silence.
00:06:35.000
That's why he's so interesting to excavate generation after generation.
00:06:40.000
You're going to be silent about history?
00:06:42.000
Yes, about the history that left deposits on his sensibility.
00:06:48.000
And I just wanted to start off by saying that one of the things that helped me understand Conrad
00:06:56.000
was actually a recent book, "Juvan Essence."
00:07:00.000
One thing that really stuck in my mind was when you said how old is my mind?
00:07:06.000
I converse with Plato, with Vika, with Socrates, with any number of figures for the last 2,500 years.
00:07:16.000
So does that make my mind 2,500 years old?
00:07:20.000
And I exist in that same world where those are the people who are always in my mind.
00:07:26.000
And so that creates layers and layers of sensibility as well as layers and layers of a palimpsestic mind.
00:07:35.000
I don't agree with Ford Maddox for the Conrad thought and Polish translated into French, and then into English with the help of his English friends.
00:07:45.000
No. No.
00:07:48.000
It depends when you learned a language, what you learned in that language.
00:07:53.000
He thought certain things very much in English straight English because there was no Polish for it.
00:08:00.000
It's very important to remember Polish history because, and I'll get to that, because as a country that had been partitioned in 1775 among the three empires, Catherine the Greats-Russia, she was the mastermind, of course, Frederick the Seconds-Prussia and Maria Theresa.
00:08:22.000
Poland was devoured by empires. It's natural that Conrad would then look for an empire like Britain's that would especially counteract Russia.
00:08:33.000
For him, to me, the sea is the opposite of being landlocked in Poland, a place where he was very claustrophobic.
00:08:42.000
And to go out into the sea was to be free, equally free of all the different land masses, all the different empires, and to find your own place there on the boat.
00:08:57.000
It also, I think a lot of people don't understand that the most cosmopolitan people are the people from small peripheral countries.
00:09:07.000
And so, the very best educated people are the ones from the small countries.
00:09:31.000
His cosmopolitanism was just layered deep, not only in him because of his experience, but also in his family.
00:09:39.000
I agree the provinces tend to be the most cosmopolitan in many ways among at least the intellectuals there.
00:09:48.000
And sometimes the most provincial people in the ordinary sense of that term are at the absolute center.
00:09:54.000
I hate to say this to our New York cosmopolitan people in New York.
00:09:59.000
Listen to me, I'm listening to you as a New York, but some of the most provincial people I've ever met were New Yorkers, because there's nothing outside of New York that matters.
00:10:07.000
So there's a strange dialectic between cosmopolitanism and the cosmos as such.
00:10:12.000
And particularly for literary people.
00:10:15.000
And one of the things that you have to say is that literature is relatively cheap to produce unlike art, architecture, even music.
00:10:26.000
And so countries like Ireland, which Poland has a great deal in common with, they put all of their talent into being great conversations rather than a dinner table, not being boring, because this is all you've got, this is your art.
00:10:42.000
And also the fact that Ireland and Poland were both very much implicated in the Roman Catholic culture.
00:10:51.000
Which is, yes, the peasants are primitive, they believe the more primitive sides of the religion.
00:10:58.000
But Poland was part of the Renaissance.
00:11:01.000
Poland was part of that enormous network of scholarly monasteries and so on.
00:11:07.000
So it actually, one of the things that bothered Conrad was when he was called a Slav, because for the world, Slavs were Russians.
00:11:16.000
And there is nothing similar about the Russian mentality and the Polish mentality.
00:11:21.000
One is the Catholic world and the other one is the Greek Orthodox world and they separated in the year 1000 and completely different mentalities.
00:11:32.000
Did Conrad actually, was he an observant Catholic way, grew up going to mass and did this sacraments in communion?
00:11:40.000
No, no, his father was a really interesting man, Apollo Kojonyovski, aristocrats and his wife, Evelina.
00:11:52.000
And they were both socialists, he was fire eating, he was very famous in Poland, he was very literary, he translated Shakespeare and a lot of other things, very polyglot.
00:12:09.000
And because they actively participated in Polish uprisings against the Russian Tsar and the regime, they were punished and they were severely punished.
00:12:22.000
Conrad was born in Bedaditjev, which is now in Ukraine.
00:12:28.000
His family were exiled there for seven years.
00:12:31.000
They both died of TB there because of the dreadful conditions, essentially concentration conditions.
00:12:37.000
And Conrad was left in orphan, he was cared for by his uncle, Beroski and who was wealthy.
00:12:46.000
And I just wanted to stress the theme of treachery in Conrad's psyche.
00:12:55.000
And it goes very deep because it's not what it seems.
00:12:59.000
His name was originally Yusuf Teodor, gift of God.
00:13:05.000
Conrad, and I'll tell you about that, Kojonyovski, which means root.
00:13:10.000
And Conrad comes from the drama written by Adam Ytzkyevich, his first well-known drama called Conrad Valenrod.
00:13:21.000
And Conrad Valenrod was about a poll who is in the Russian empire and who creates a double life for himself, where he seems to be a traitor to the Polish cause, but actually is secretly setting things up for a rebellion.
00:13:38.000
And so he's known as a kind of means and kind of traitor.
00:13:42.000
Everyone takes him to be a traitor, but he holds his own truth inside and he acts on it.
00:13:49.000
And this became a very romantic model for trying to live in an empire and keep your own identity, but not just be constantly sent to into Siberia and exile.
00:14:01.000
And so when they named him, he gave him this name Conrad and then he chose it as his main last name.
00:14:08.000
That was a big symbolic theme.
00:14:13.000
He was very loyal to his father.
00:14:16.000
As I said, his father was a socialist.
00:14:18.000
He was very left-wing.
00:14:19.000
He was very interested in the plight of the people.
00:14:23.000
In a lot of ways, he was similar to the stefsky.
00:14:26.000
It does early to stefsky.
00:14:28.000
He was a socialist at a rebel and eventually arrested and exiled for those very reasons.
00:14:36.000
He had concentration camp in the stefsky met Polish dissidents.
00:14:43.000
And at the time, they were the only people he could talk to because they were intellectuals and so on.
00:14:48.000
And then the stefsky turned on them.
00:14:51.000
And in all his successive works, he trashed the Poles horribly, made fun of them.
00:14:56.000
You know, all kinds of stuff.
00:14:58.000
Why is that?
00:14:59.000
Probably, well, I mean, it's obvious why.
00:15:02.000
Because it's that kind of thing that you see all the time now under Putin throwing red meat to the conservatives and to the people who are creating a very simple basic Russian identity, which is we are inside our boundary and everything outside our boundary is the enemy disgusting, you know, evil and so on and funny.
00:15:26.000
And does stefsky is a very funny writer.
00:15:29.000
So he, I mean, he just put genius into his comic takedowns, for example, of the two Poles in brother's caramaza.
00:15:35.000
You know, it's genius, but it's completely infuriating.
00:15:40.000
And he was always like that.
00:15:42.000
I mean, he was a complete jingoist.
00:15:43.000
But that's because he was trying so desperately to make himself Russian when does the efsky was not in any way like the Russianism that he was propagating.
00:15:53.000
So let me go ahead and get back.
00:15:57.000
Yes.
00:15:58.000
So the second part of the treachery is that Conrad felt extremely claustrophobic in Poland.
00:16:09.000
Now, you have to understand that when a country has been deprived of its physical existence, no land, they were left with nothing but language and they were forbidden to get higher education.
00:16:22.000
So they were auto-didacts.
00:16:24.000
And for them to remain cultured was to remain Polish.
00:16:29.000
And they lived, you know, every family was this fanatical little nest of Polish patriots who kept in touch with the whole world looking for some kind of alliances.
00:16:41.000
And so Conrad felt extremely claustrophobic in that atmosphere.
00:16:47.000
I know it well because I was brought up in it, so I know.
00:16:50.000
And his uncle, so that was the high romantic side of being Polish.
00:16:56.000
The second side was called positivism.
00:16:59.000
And it was about learning to be part of the modern world by becoming capitalist, by becoming wealthy, by actually having sort of street smarts and not just being idealists who sacrificed themselves every generation.
00:17:13.000
His uncle was like that, and he took Conrad under his wing.
00:17:18.000
And one of the things that comes out of the correspondence is that he constantly horribly belittled Conrad's father, Apollo Kojonyovski.
00:17:28.000
And so it was really, I have to tell you, it's been tabulated and Conrad constantly uses Shakespeare.
00:17:37.000
He learned Shakespeare at his father's knee.
00:17:40.000
But he particularly hamlet.
00:17:44.000
And it's his father was a translator of...
00:17:46.000
Yes, his father was a translator of Shakespeare's comedies, which is really interesting.
00:17:52.000
And Conrad, sorry, walked into his father's office one day and did the unthinkable.
00:17:58.000
He started reading what was on his desk.
00:18:00.000
And his father walked in and he thought, oh no.
00:18:03.000
And his father said, read this out loud.
00:18:06.000
And he read it out loud.
00:18:08.000
It was a Polish translation.
00:18:09.000
He was seven years old.
00:18:10.000
It was a translation of the two gentlemen from Verona.
00:18:13.000
And that his father said, you did that pretty well.
00:18:18.000
Good, now I know what it sounds like.
00:18:21.000
Notice that that word "Gentlemen" is right there.
00:18:24.000
When you said "Apoll, a Catholic and a gentleman."
00:18:28.000
So there was a definite father being loyal to the ghost of the father, but not in form.
00:18:37.000
But finding a way to be loyal to his father in the rest of his life.
00:18:42.000
You can't say because certainly, politically Conrad was known as a conservative.
00:18:47.000
Oh, it's getting...
00:18:48.000
It was no social.
00:18:49.000
It was no social.
00:18:50.000
One can read it.
00:18:51.000
You know, you know how his eye always goes to the people below and he looks at them really closely.
00:18:58.000
In all of his imperial, you know, all of the continents that he visited,
00:19:02.000
he's so much...
00:19:04.000
I would call a liberation Catholic.
00:19:07.000
And he has pretty much loathing and disgust for the ruling class.
00:19:14.000
He does have...
00:19:16.000
Especially the capitalist class, but he also had a loathing and contempt for socialism.
00:19:21.000
That's just what happened because of Russia.
00:19:26.000
Okay.
00:19:27.000
Because in the Russian Empire it took a very violent turn.
00:19:31.000
It took a demagogic, you know, and it had to do with what was going on in Russia,
00:19:36.000
which was really vile.
00:19:38.000
Was his uncle... His uncle was not socialist.
00:19:41.000
His uncle was not an executive.
00:19:42.000
And he was very conservative and he trashed...
00:19:47.000
He trashed Conrad's father and the whole socialist line, you know,
00:19:52.000
and sympathizing with the poor people and all of that.
00:19:55.000
So, and he was the one who gave Conrad money.
00:19:59.000
He stipe-ended him until Conrad was 30.
00:20:02.000
And he was generous, and he let him go and be in the merchant Marine because he thought he would learn a lot.
00:20:09.000
It had to do with positivism, empiricism, having your feet on the ground and really knowing something.
00:20:15.000
And so he supported that side of Conrad, and he also did not withdraw his support when Conrad decided to become a writer.
00:20:22.000
And he supported him there as well.
00:20:24.000
So, it's not that he was united and he was actually a good writer himself.
00:20:29.000
They were all good writers.
00:20:30.000
And they had a really interesting correspondence.
00:20:33.000
But you may... He probably didn't notice this, but in the shadow line, Giles, you know,
00:20:39.000
who the art narrator finds very annoying.
00:20:42.000
He describes him as in his heavy uncle-like tones, you know,
00:20:47.000
and he immediately sends Conrad's, you know, thinking back to his uncle.
00:20:52.000
Yeah, let me mention for our listeners sake that tonight we are going to have a discussion of this particular novel.
00:20:59.000
The shadow line, which is a late work of Conrad's written at the beginning of the First World War.
00:21:05.000
And we're going to get into this later in our show, right?
00:21:08.000
Yes.
00:21:08.000
Let me go ahead.
00:21:09.000
We will very soon.
00:21:10.000
So, just to finish with what he was Conrad, he became...
00:21:15.000
You know, like a lot of people, he became more conservative.
00:21:18.000
He hung out with rich people in England, although most of the time he was dirt poor.
00:21:22.000
And they constantly commented on him.
00:21:25.000
And as far as...
00:21:29.000
And he loved being like all polls, he spoke with a fork tongue, he spoke in double-triple, quadruple layers.
00:21:36.000
So, when he said a gentleman, a Catholic and a gentleman, he was an aristocrat.
00:21:43.000
In England, he became, you know, a gentleman, a sort of general gentleman.
00:21:49.000
Catholic, I'm sure he was using in the original sense of Catholic, meaning all possible, you know,
00:21:54.000
broad interests, broad affiliations.
00:21:57.000
And a poll definitely at the end of his life when he visited, you know, before, just before the shadow line,
00:22:05.000
he visited Poland for the first time.
00:22:07.000
He was tremendously moved by it.
00:22:09.000
He was almost trapped there because of World War I.
00:22:12.000
And when he emerged, he very much became re-witted to his Polish identity and told people about it, wrote people about it.
00:22:22.000
And so, this is what I want to say about that.
00:22:26.000
The poll is there within the cosmopolitanism.
00:22:30.000
And you know how things get stripped down as you, when you get older.
00:22:35.000
You can either keep doing the same thing, but Conrad did not keep doing the same thing.
00:22:39.000
He was always exploring the boundaries of his own artistic world.
00:22:44.000
And the shadow line is a perfect example of that.
00:22:47.000
He knew that he was the end.
00:22:50.000
And so I wanted to actually just read the gravestone on his gravestone.
00:22:58.000
He died August 3rd, 1924.
00:23:00.000
After several, you know, quite a few years, basically since 1915 or so, of feeling like he was done for,
00:23:08.000
like nothing good was going to come out of him.
00:23:10.000
And it was a tremendous effort to write, but he kept doing it.
00:23:13.000
And some of the last things are very good, including the shadow line.
00:23:19.000
And the gravestone is a quote from his late and not very good, or not very popular,
00:23:26.000
"rover."
00:23:27.000
And the original source of the quote is Spencer's very queen, and it is this.
00:23:33.000
"Sleep after toil, port after stormy seas, ease after war, death after life does greatly please."
00:23:44.000
And so, I know we're going to switch over to the shadow line, and I am very curious.
00:23:52.000
I was curious when you told me why you chose this late novel.
00:23:59.000
Well, to begin with, that I'm curious, why did you feel that you wanted to read the words on the gravestone?
00:24:06.000
Because I find that really disappointing, because I find it trite and British and Cucie and unworthy of Conrad.
00:24:13.000
Okay, that's fine, but I had a different reason for it.
00:24:17.000
I completely agree that because Conrad always pays attention to the things that are inscribed on,
00:24:25.000
it's a graveyard near Canterbury.
00:24:29.000
It's definitely foregrounding his respect of, like this is a respectable gravestone.
00:24:37.000
It's Victorian.
00:24:39.000
It is completely conventional. But inside of that, you know, Spencer's very queen was far from it.
00:24:46.000
It was a poetic revolution in English literature.
00:24:50.000
And it fits with the idea of palimpsest, that the fairy queen is inside the rover, which is still, you know, about roving and not finding.
00:25:02.000
And it's about the end of a life. We talked about this, that the shadow line pretty much removes all of the beautiful plush of Conrad's textures, his verbal textures, the veils, and the beauty, the gorgeous, you know, baroque kind of writing, and takes it down to the very bear, you strip down, like the canvas underneath.
00:25:30.000
And that actually for our ear now makes it seem more modern and so on, because all of that Victorian stuff is gone.
00:25:39.000
And what touches me about this gravestone is that he wants to follow what life is all the way, even in its decline, even in itself doubt, even in its old age conservatism.
00:25:54.000
He keeps saying where he is. And the death after life is part, you know, it's that shadow line.
00:26:03.000
He talks about the shadow line being something that young men have to face, moving from childhood into their very ambitious and wanting to know.
00:26:13.000
And he says it's so wonderful because he says not to find out who they are as individuals, as romantics, but how they're going to follow in the line of initiation into manhood that so many have trodden before them.
00:26:29.000
And this gravestone talks about the same easing after war, death after life, does greatly please, that you are easing into the next shadow line that everyone has trodden before.
00:26:42.000
Before we talk about the shadow line, Monika, can we talk about the effect that Polish romanticism had on Conrad and where you see the traces of that legacy in his prose style?
00:26:56.000
Yes.
00:26:59.000
And Harry talked about the Renaissance and Poland actually having much more layers to his literacy. Also because it was part of the Catholic world, everybody knew Latin often Greek as well.
00:27:12.000
And so there have been, you know, linguistic studies about this Polish is quite different from other Slavic languages because there's this big Latin substrate, the grammar, the knowledge of the poetry, the inversions, you know, there's a lot.
00:27:28.000
And it's the very structured, very rich muscular grammar.
00:27:33.000
And it has utterly different syntax and the thinking that goes with it from Russian, which is all participle nesting, you know, and things like that.
00:27:42.000
And so the Polish romantic poets were extremely well educated in that kind of Catholic sort of school.
00:27:54.000
And they had, I mean, scavit, for example, had the most fabulously muscular, masculine, vivid way of grabbing a subject.
00:28:06.000
It was not wispy at all. It was really Renaissancey. And it also had a Miltonian feeling.
00:28:16.000
But the real command of diction, of really strong decisive diction, which is English, it's easy. You've got a lot of monosyllables, you know, and so on.
00:28:27.000
And Polish, you have no monosyllables. You have nothing but these wavy lines, but he did it.
00:28:33.000
And his pantadé was just, you know, his great epic about life in Lithuania, Conrad Valenra.
00:28:41.000
And Jadé, his probably his greatest dramatic work, is about Slavic connection with ancestral voices.
00:28:50.000
It's actually very eerie and it would be great in Africa. It's meant to be performed in Africa.
00:28:55.000
And so there's this real sense of that palimpsestic drawing on many, many voices and synthesizing them in a great style.
00:29:05.000
And that's what we have in Conrad. I mean, scavit is just, you know, the great example of that.
00:29:12.000
And then also that meets scavit went to Paris and became like the speaker for things Polish and for things Slavic in Paris.
00:29:20.000
And then there's Swavatski and Krashensky who wrote great epic poems, which were sort of explored the more philosophical and actually not wispy but subtle symbolists, they're proto-symbolists.
00:29:37.000
And so there's that other type of Polish diction and Polish mentality, which yes is metaphysical. It's not Catholic. It's mystical.
00:29:47.000
And so those various threads all involved.
00:29:53.000
And you think they're important for Conrad?
00:29:56.000
Completely important, and he said so. He said so. I mean, and he ended up actually switching over to Swavatski who was also my mother's favorite.
00:30:05.000
He was reading a lot of French authors, however, I think even more than the British authors.
00:30:11.000
And then, I think that's the first part of the book that I've ever read.
00:30:18.000
And I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:22.000
And I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:27.000
And I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:32.000
And I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:38.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:43.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:47.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:51.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:30:56.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:00.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:05.000
And I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:10.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:15.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:19.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:24.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:29.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:34.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:37.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:40.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:44.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:48.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:52.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:31:55.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:00.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:03.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:06.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:10.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:14.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:18.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:21.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:24.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:27.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:30.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:33.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:36.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:39.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:42.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:45.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:48.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:51.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:54.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:32:58.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:33:02.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:33:06.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:33:10.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:33:13.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:33:17.000
And so I think that's the first part of the book that I've read.
00:33:21.000
Join, quote.
00:33:22.000
Yes, yes.
00:33:23.000
Yes, yes, yes.
00:33:24.000
But see, and just in that short one, he merged.
00:33:27.000
And he, those moments are the tellest man moments.
00:33:32.000
It's not that he thought of it in Polish.
00:33:34.000
No, he thought of it instantly in Shakespearean.
00:33:37.000
And it meant a whole merging of sensibility for him in just a few words.
00:33:43.000
What were you going to say about the Moz used?
00:33:45.000
Yes.
00:33:46.000
The Moz used for our listeners is a aesthetic of finding always the right word as the kind of prime directive for the novelist.
00:33:56.000
No?
00:33:57.000
Yes.
00:33:58.000
And the poet, what did you want to say about the Moz used?
00:34:01.000
OK, I wanted to actually cite or have you cite a few lines from the preface to a personal record.
00:34:11.000
Conrad's late work, which is an incredibly interesting insight into his entire body of work.
00:34:18.000
So Conrad writes, "You perceive the force of a word.
00:34:21.000
He who wants to persuade should put his trust not in the right argument but in the right word.
00:34:26.000
The power of sound has always been greater than the power of sense.
00:34:30.000
I don't say this by way of disparagement.
00:34:32.000
It is better for mankind to be impressionable than reflective.
00:34:35.000
Nothing humanely great, great, I mean as affecting a whole massive lives has come from a
00:34:40.980
reflection.
00:34:41.980
On the other hand, you cannot fail to see the power of mere words.
00:34:45.980
Such words as glory, for instance, or pity.
00:34:47.980
I won't mention anymore.
00:34:49.980
They are not far to seek, shouted with perseverance, with ardor, with conviction these two by their sound alone,
00:34:55.980
have set whole nations in motion and upheaval and a be heaved the dry hard ground on which
00:35:01.980
rests our whole social fabric.
00:35:03.980
There is virtue for you if you like.
00:35:06.980
Of course, the accent must be attended to the right accent.
00:35:11.980
That is very important.
00:35:12.980
The capacious lung, the thundering or the tender vocal cords don't talk to me of your
00:35:18.600
Archimedes lever."
00:35:20.600
Yeah, such a great, such a great passage.
00:35:23.780
And you see him there, he is talking about Loomo's juice, getting it right, but then he
00:35:30.580
turns it into the slogan, "Eering Mo'jost," words like, "Glory and pity," that are shouted
00:35:36.660
out by French politicians and so on.
00:35:40.940
But also have a deep meaning for him, and you could say they are at the bottom of all
00:35:46.580
of his huge social, his enormous social fabrics.
00:35:51.580
And he's talking about his own accent.
00:35:54.580
Everybody commented after reading his beautiful prose on hearing his dreadful Polish accent
00:36:00.380
Virginia Woolf made it very memorable.
00:36:02.660
And then she says, "And then I open his writing and it's so beautiful."
00:36:07.900
She says, "I lose interest sometimes in the plots, the adventures, but I always stop at
00:36:12.380
passages that are so beautiful and they become like tuning forks for me."
00:36:17.260
And then he also is talking about British accents.
00:36:20.620
Every accent that he ever encountered in his seafaring days in Britain, it's Henry Higgins
00:36:26.460
and they say, "Whether you've heard or not heard, whether it will be heard as comic,
00:36:35.060
pretentious, overblown."
00:36:37.580
And so he has a very fine and ironic, you know, discuision about intonation, accent,
00:36:46.060
the music of language.
00:36:48.220
I want to make you hear.
00:36:49.580
He says, "I want to make you see, not think."
00:36:53.500
Although he does plenty of that too.
00:36:55.580
The funny thing about a personal record is that it's not so much a biography, autobiography.
00:37:00.820
It's about how he came to write all Myers-Folly.
00:37:06.980
And how he began with the line, the thing that really stood out for him was how he was
00:37:12.140
going to end it.
00:37:13.140
It was going to be Nina saying the sun was setting at last.
00:37:18.940
And then he talks about how all these voices, all these people around him kept interrupting
00:37:25.060
his process of writing for many years.
00:37:28.820
And so it's all about the interruptions of his conception, of his inspiration.
00:37:34.140
And then finally getting to that line when he wrote it the very end in an all-nighter,
00:37:39.260
where he finally finishes this many-year project.
00:37:44.940
And so it really tells you how the fabric of the world looking through the port hole
00:37:50.780
is certain moment.
00:37:51.860
Somebody's saying something, someone at a table gets woven into the synthesis that's
00:37:57.740
being created.
00:37:59.980
And then I suddenly realized Nina was saying the sun was setting at last.
00:38:08.060
Well his mother was named Evelina.
00:38:10.380
And that's a very common thing to make a significant woman have a rhyming alter ego.
00:38:16.540
And it made me think about what, you know, because there's a lot of stuff now these
00:38:20.860
days about his being a homosexual and so on.
00:38:23.620
He lost his mother very early the same way that Tolstoy did.
00:38:27.860
And you know, psychoanalytic sort of jargon when the mother disappears early she becomes
00:38:34.380
the ideal and no woman can ever, ever compete with her.
00:38:39.460
And so anyway, I like the thought that he is basically that idea was the end world is ending.
00:38:49.060
Nina says last the sun was setting at last and that has this tremendous resonance for
00:38:55.000
Conrad, the end of his emotional world in some way.
00:38:59.260
And then having to go out one of the things that he said is you have to leave in order
00:39:05.580
to show how you love, just staying there is not going to show your love.
00:39:09.940
And you read this as autobiographical in relation to Poland.
00:39:14.940
In relation to the feeling of claustrophobia and Poland and why any poll who wanted to do
00:39:22.420
something great had to leave Poland in order to be able to do it.
00:39:27.220
Everything was too constricted.
00:39:29.460
And whether it's Marie Curie, you know, Chopin, Miskievich, you had to leave.
00:39:35.460
And the whole idea was to make Poland disappear.
00:39:39.340
And so you had to get out and then express that tremendously complex sensibility out there
00:39:46.460
in the world.
00:39:48.100
Do you know of any Polish writers who resemble Conrad as a writer at all?
00:39:52.460
Yes, Gombroevich, the comparison has been made the great modernist writer Gombroevich,
00:39:59.060
who also was...
00:40:00.060
Was he emulating Conrad?
00:40:03.300
He probably wouldn't say so, but he was proudly from the provinces.
00:40:07.140
He was very anti-Polish actually for the same reasons.
00:40:11.060
But in that way, very Polish, very perverse.
00:40:14.580
And he went to emigrated to Latin America, had a wild life, you know, wrote tremendously
00:40:21.700
cosmopolitan, funny and layered books.
00:40:25.260
And yeah, there's a lot in common.
00:40:27.780
Conrad ended up despairing about the political future of Poland, right?
00:40:31.900
And despairing about the world.
00:40:33.900
Yes, but especially that he gave up hope that Poland was really ever going to get it together.
00:40:38.900
No, it's not.
00:40:39.900
Please don't think it's about getting it together.
00:40:42.540
It was actually, it didn't exist.
00:40:45.500
Yeah.
00:40:46.500
And, you know, sadly, actually Poland was freed.
00:40:49.900
He died in 1924, so it had been freed for two years at that point.
00:40:56.100
So who knows?
00:40:57.500
Yeah.
00:40:58.500
And an amazing golden age in that interwar period.
00:41:02.500
So I don't really have a sense of what would be the Polish psyche of which Conrad's psyche
00:41:11.460
would be a declension.
00:41:13.220
You're talking about the stratification, the palimpsestic, the fact that he was haunted
00:41:18.380
by a plurality of voices, that he would incorporate all these different voices that he
00:41:22.140
would hear around him.
00:41:23.340
And they were, it was like a symphony, but also extremely visual.
00:41:26.980
He had an unbelievable ability to do a kind of phenomenological exploration of any environment
00:41:35.300
no matter how tiny, no matter how huge.
00:41:37.940
And certainly in an novel like Lord Jim, you get the multiple narrative voices.
00:41:42.340
In fact, whole proliferation of these voices.
00:41:45.900
And that's part of his modernistic style.
00:41:47.820
And he was very on the cutting edge of a certain kind of literary modernism in that period.
00:41:54.820
The book that was 1900.
00:41:56.700
Yeah, yeah, that was early on.
00:41:59.780
And most of his really experimental writing was early on rather than the later stuff becomes
00:42:07.020
more conventional.
00:42:08.460
For example, the shadow line is not experimental at all in that way.
00:42:13.300
It's kind of mono, it's a mono narrative.
00:42:16.820
The line on Conrad among critics is that he really didn't write any great works after
00:42:21.460
1911 that he had spent himself, exhausted himself, under Western eyes might be the last
00:42:27.620
one.
00:42:28.620
And that perhaps some people like Ian Watt are ex-colleague of a here at Stanford, one of
00:42:36.020
the great Conrad scholars believes that the shadow line is a late masterpiece.
00:42:42.340
Shadow line being written in 1915, I think it was comes out.
00:42:47.460
And yet it's one of the few after 1911 that people that might be a candidate for another
00:42:53.860
great career.
00:42:54.860
Also, the secret share is late as well.
00:42:58.260
That's right before it's a short story.
00:43:00.980
The shadow line is an autobiography.
00:43:02.900
He calls it in the subtitle.
00:43:06.500
And he wrote it, I think he was inspired by his son Boris.
00:43:11.220
A young, I think he was only 17 or 18 years old in listing to go to war in the First
00:43:17.980
World War.
00:43:19.300
And he wrote the story of his first command.
00:43:21.620
It's very much based on his experience of receiving his first, and I think only command
00:43:29.340
as a captain on a ship, the Otago.
00:43:34.940
And of course, it was not a felicitous experience because many of the crew were infected
00:43:43.300
with tropical fever.
00:43:44.300
They had malaria.
00:43:45.300
He set out to see hoping that the sea would-- and the fresh air would cure all that.
00:43:50.860
But in fact, what happens is that there is this terrible kind of lull, a windless two
00:43:55.340
weeks of just immobility on the sea where the health of the crew gets worse and worse,
00:44:01.820
and they're kind of wasting away.
00:44:04.300
And the Conrad is under this intense crisis of pressure, and he's imagining a kind of ghost
00:44:14.260
ship that had been found on the sea where all the crew were kind of dead on there.
00:44:21.540
And it's an ordeal.
00:44:22.980
And he goes to it, and he describes that ordeal in a rather straightforward manner for
00:44:27.780
his previous style of writing for sure, and calls it the shadow line to-- as marking the difference
00:44:35.260
between youth and this initiation into maturity.
00:44:39.700
But I know you have a lot to say about that, so I'd like to invite you to say why you think
00:44:47.140
he was written in this monologic style.
00:44:51.020
I don't know if that's the right word, but you know what I mean.
00:44:53.460
Yes, I do.
00:44:59.780
Well I already talked somewhat about it.
00:45:02.100
If you think about Beethoven's like quartets, the stripping down in age, sometimes things
00:45:09.300
get really big and fluffy, and sometimes they get very stripped down.
00:45:14.500
And then there's this quotation here from Henry James.
00:45:20.220
One finds it in the midst of all-- sorry.
00:45:23.260
One finds it in the midst of all this warfare as hard to apply one's words as to endure
00:45:28.300
one's thoughts.
00:45:30.060
The war has used up words.
00:45:32.260
They have weakened.
00:45:33.540
They have deteriorated like motor card tires.
00:45:36.260
They have like millions of other things, been more over strained and knocked about and
00:45:41.020
voided of the happy semblance during the last six months than in all the long ages before.
00:45:46.820
This is 1915 that he's writing.
00:45:49.180
And we are now confronted with the depreciation of all our terms or otherwise speaking
00:45:54.100
with a loss of expression through increase of limpness that may well make us wonder what
00:46:00.420
ghosts will be left to walk.
00:46:02.780
Great.
00:46:03.780
Where does that come from?
00:46:05.220
This comes from Henry James's first interview, New York Times Magazine, 21st March
00:46:11.700
1915, page 4.
00:46:14.460
It is in the Cambridge edition of Joseph Conrad, the Shadow Line.
00:46:19.500
It's a very moving quote.
00:46:21.460
It is.
00:46:22.460
And of course in our own day and age we're experiencing the same thing for different
00:46:26.020
reasons which is the devaluation and depreciation of the power of words to resound as
00:46:32.660
Conrad believed that they do in that passage that we read from a personal record where
00:46:39.060
our basic words like glory, sacrifice or freedom here in America we these words are constantly
00:46:49.020
being cheaply invoked and they have just been worn down of their power to mean.
00:46:56.900
Yes, good, yes, exactly.
00:47:02.620
And so you believe that in the face of that kind of depreciation of the power of the word
00:47:06.060
that the writer becomes minimalist, not minimalistic but pairs it down and becomes reduct.
00:47:12.460
Yes, and it's really, I think it's really important in our age of sort of interest in repetition,
00:47:19.260
Nietzsche and eternal recurrence, eternal return that he calls it autobiographical.
00:47:26.940
That doesn't mean that it's only about that early autobiographical moment.
00:47:31.420
He's all about palimpsest.
00:47:33.900
It means that that moment, the early moment and this late, possibly last moment of writing
00:47:41.420
are overlapped on each other.
00:47:44.340
And in between are the great novels, the conquest and so on.
00:47:48.380
But at this point with World War I, you know, it's son, but not only son, he always had
00:47:55.180
a vision of masses of people suffering.
00:47:58.620
And so the people on the boat and the hold, the sailors who could have been full of resentment
00:48:04.940
and so on actually are wasting away and you're aware of them because he very briefly
00:48:12.460
mentions that they're even thinner, that they're closer hanging, the cheekbones, the
00:48:18.820
eye sockets.
00:48:20.620
And it's kind of like the moon, the scream.
00:48:24.380
And so he doesn't have to say a lot, it just has to be these little glimpses that
00:48:29.980
and you're always aware of it down in the hold of any kind of a passage.
00:48:34.700
You know, whether it's the middle passage, you know, all of the different, you know,
00:48:38.180
she's seafaring passages.
00:48:41.660
And so they're completely wasted away.
00:48:46.140
And yet at the same time in the moment of emergency, which is when finally there's a breakthrough
00:48:51.020
and there's going to be a storm, a squall, they managed to do at least the minimum in order
00:48:58.540
to save the ship from disaster.
00:49:00.660
Yes.
00:49:01.660
And in that sense, I think that the end of the shadow line is anything but heroic in the
00:49:06.620
sense of triumphalistic, but that it's through the weakness and the be humbling, that
00:49:14.140
is when people can come together with a certain kind of solidarity in the recognition of
00:49:21.580
our own frailties.
00:49:23.420
Very good weaknesses.
00:49:25.220
And you started off with that immersion and disaster that you actually have to go down
00:49:30.620
into the disaster.
00:49:31.620
It's a line from Lord Jim.
00:49:33.180
Yes.
00:49:34.180
Yes.
00:49:35.180
And that's so early too.
00:49:36.180
It's meant to bring back the beginnings.
00:49:39.660
So I just wanted to complete that idea which is that in some ways it's a call to Europe
00:49:49.300
to know that it's going into World War I as a disaster and that they're going to be,
00:49:55.500
you know, it's like you knew that they were going to be all in the trenches, skeletons
00:49:58.940
in the trenches, and that they were going to have to go through this in order to, you
00:50:04.180
know, to come out at the end.
00:50:05.940
It's amazing how Prussian in a certain sense the whole lukalmpla which is a place.
00:50:13.860
Yes.
00:50:14.860
This dead calm and immobility of the ship on the sea seems so uncannily, prescient of
00:50:24.100
being immobilized in the trenches.
00:50:25.940
That was a war where there was no movement.
00:50:28.180
It was just being stuck, stuck, stuck with disaster, striking every day and not being able
00:50:35.580
to move either advanced more than a kilometer.
00:50:38.580
It's so futuristic the way he sensed that that's the direction it was going as in so
00:50:44.260
many of his novels.
00:50:45.260
But I just wanted to say one last thing that he says there's that moment he says I was
00:50:50.220
no good.
00:50:51.900
And you could say that, you know, yes of course, but also that at the end of his life he's
00:50:57.260
been doubting his own work now for about 10 years.
00:51:00.860
He thinks that it's not only are his new things no good but that his past things were
00:51:05.660
no good.
00:51:06.980
And this last piece of writing also is in some way to explore that idea of not being good
00:51:14.180
and then to pull out after all this thread-bear piece of writing that's just the thing
00:51:20.420
you need for that moment.
00:51:22.420
In the book, in the drama he is self-doubt is very profound and convincing and there's
00:51:33.580
a moment where he's threatened really to succumb to a total paralysis and not get out
00:51:40.900
on deck at the most critical moment and ransom who is this chief's tour is the one who
00:51:49.420
gently urges him to get back on deck and it seems to be an acknowledgement that you need
00:51:56.900
the help of others.
00:51:58.500
And that is through the sort of solidarity that others can provide in those moments that
00:52:07.660
even if you're not good enough because I think under other circumstances that inner weakness
00:52:13.660
that inner insecurity could have gotten the better of him.
00:52:22.060
But it was thanks to external circumstances not the self overcoming its own weaknesses
00:52:22.900
of its own sort of autonomy.
00:52:26.580
And therefore the ship becomes a, I don't want to call it an allegory is not that at all
00:52:31.820
but the ship becomes emblematic of how people depend on each other.
00:52:36.660
Our interdependence is the only thing that will save us.
00:52:40.820
Yes.
00:52:41.820
An acknowledgement of it.
00:52:43.140
Yes.
00:52:44.140
But it's confessional and autobiographical because I think he had a profound self-doubt
00:52:50.020
is in his life, in his early life.
00:52:52.500
And when he took that first command he actually in that crisis didn't know if he would be
00:52:56.900
equal to the challenge.
00:52:59.700
But there's that other thing about him that even though he was an defeat aristocrat,
00:53:05.700
he was touchy at a bad time, and he was super insecure as any poverty-stricken immigrant
00:53:13.020
is coming into richer societies.
00:53:15.740
He had to prove himself every second of every day.
00:53:19.260
But he was so adventurous.
00:53:21.540
He wanted to do these things that would test him and break him and just see what would
00:53:26.180
be left and that's what he did constantly.
00:53:29.260
And he wasn't, I feel like he wasn't afraid to fail.
00:53:33.140
You know, I keep thinking about Beckett, you know, fail better.
00:53:36.540
And you could look at his works as just cases of exploring, trying really big things
00:53:42.900
and maybe their parts that are fate, you know, tedious, that can be criticized.
00:53:48.140
But he didn't just stop, you know.
00:53:50.460
Well you don't for someone who had been in, I don't know how many shipwrecks, I think,
00:53:54.180
eight of them.
00:53:55.980
There was three or eight, remembering the eight.
00:53:58.660
The shape.
00:53:59.660
But one way or another, someone who has gone through these moments of extraordinary intensity
00:54:04.420
and of emergency, where everything, in life and death, is at that very edge.
00:54:11.100
I think you can become addicted to that form of intensity.
00:54:16.500
You're completely right.
00:54:17.500
And if you just think it starts with the psyche of a child who's orphaned incredibly
00:54:22.340
early, essentially in a concentration camp sort of environment.
00:54:27.220
And then has to actually, you know, provide the energy, that sort of afterlife surge
00:54:33.500
of energy for the future.
00:54:36.140
And you're completely right.
00:54:37.660
And we had to go from crisis to crisis to activate that feeling of being on the edge and
00:54:42.780
making one more effort.
00:54:44.780
Great.
00:54:45.780
Well, Monika, we have to wrap this show up and then husband our energies for what I hope
00:54:54.140
is going to be a very interesting discussion of the shadow line tonight in the context of
00:54:59.180
another look, the book club.
00:55:02.340
You were at the Werner Herzog event in the winter.
00:55:06.060
We actually aired that as a special episode of entitled "Pinnys the Audio Version of it."
00:55:10.900
And tonight is going to conclude this year's another look get together at the book club
00:55:17.260
and we're going to be following up our thoughts about the shadow line tonight.
00:55:22.940
So I want to thank you again for coming on to entitled "Pinnys," remind our audience we've
00:55:26.820
been speaking with Professor Monika Greenleaf from the departments of Slavics and Comparative
00:55:32.020
Literature here at Stanford and I am Robert Harrison for entitled "Pinnys State Tuned."
00:55:37.260
We'll be with you next week.
00:55:39.060
Bye bye.
00:55:40.060
Bye.
00:55:41.060
[Music]
00:55:48.060
[Music]
00:55:55.060
[Music]
00:56:02.060
[Music]
00:56:09.060
[Music]
00:56:16.060
[Music]
00:56:23.060
[Music]
00:56:30.060
[Music]
00:56:37.060
[Music]
00:56:44.060
[Music]
00:56:48.060
[Music]
00:56:52.060
[Music]
00:56:56.060
[Music]
00:57:02.060
[Music]
00:57:08.060
[Music]
00:57:18.060
[Music]
00:57:26.060
[Music]
00:57:32.060
[Music]
00:57:40.060
[Music]
00:57:48.060
[Music]
00:57:56.060
[Music]
00:58:00.060
[Music]
00:58:04.060
[Music]
00:58:08.060
[Music]
00:58:14.060
[Music]
00:58:20.060
[Music]
00:58:24.060
[Music]
00:58:30.060
[Music]
00:58:34.060
[Music]
00:58:40.060
[Music]
00:58:44.060
[Music]
00:58:48.060
[Music]
00:58:56.060
[Music]
00:59:04.060
(upbeat music)