table of contents

09/23/2022

Dark Matter, God, and the Fate of the Universe with Maria Elena Monzani

A conversation with Maria Elena Monzani, lead scientist at SLAC national accelerator laboratory and one of the world’s pioneer investigators of dark matter.Songs in this episode:“The World Spins” by Julee Cruise

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[Music]
00:00:20.720
If darkness is our oldest friend and if we return to it again and again,
00:00:26.320
it's because it was with us around us and in us before we emerge into the day's divinity.
00:00:33.200
When we search for origins, for the seminal priority of first principles,
00:00:39.280
we venture into the depths of a metaphysical night that extends far beyond Earth's
00:00:44.880
nocturnal shadow, onto the source of all sources. Look up at the night sky,
00:00:53.120
all those stars and all ordinary matter make up only a small fraction of what's out there.
00:01:00.080
The rest is dark upon dark. Stay tuned friends, a show on the evidence of things unseen, coming up.
00:01:09.040
[Music]
00:01:18.080
[Music]
00:01:22.080
[Music]
00:01:28.080
[Music]
00:01:34.080
[Music]
00:01:40.080
[Music]
00:01:46.080
[Music]
00:01:56.080
I'm Robert Harrison for entitled opinions coming to you from the studios of KZSU on the Stanford campus.
00:02:03.360
And if it pains you that I'm fading out Julie Cruz's interstellar voice singing the world spins,
00:02:11.440
sit tight because I'll play the song in its entirety at the end of today's show.
00:02:16.080
Who said angels don't exist?
00:02:19.120
I'm joined today by Maria Elena Monzani, one of the world's pioneering investigators
00:02:27.600
of what goes by the name of dark matter.
00:02:30.000
Maria Elena is a lead scientist at the Stanford Linear Accelerator or Slack as we call it around here.
00:02:39.440
And one of the leaders of the Luke's Zeppelin Dark Matter experiment with the Cavley Institute for
00:02:45.200
Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology.
00:02:47.760
In 2005 she received a joint PhD in Astroparticle physics from the Dunidit Hall University of Paris,
00:02:56.720
Parissette and the Univertitad de Listudie Di Milano in 2005.
00:03:05.040
She received the Excess Scale Science Application Award in 2019 and NASA's Group Achievement Award
00:03:11.600
in 2010. It's a real pleasure to welcome her to the program. Maria Elena, thanks for joining us
00:03:17.200
today on entitled opinions.
00:03:19.120
Thanks for having me in the catacombs.
00:03:20.800
Yes, we are in the deep dark.
00:03:24.000
Speaking of which, in my intro I mentioned this phrase "The Evidence of Things Unseen"
00:03:33.040
and it's a phrase I actually borrow from the epistle to the Hebrews, which contains a famous
00:03:39.680
Pauline definition of faith, "The substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things unseen."
00:03:47.520
But today we're going to be talking about a very different kind of evidence in the epistle
00:03:52.880
to the Hebrews had in mind with that definition. But let me put my first question to you about
00:03:59.040
dark matter in a roundabout way. I know you're a lover of poetry, so here's a poem by WH Auden
00:04:06.560
called "The More Loving One." It's rhyming coupleists give a veneer of playfulness,
00:04:13.120
yet I think a very earnest intent lies under the Sing Song surface.
00:04:17.840
Looking up at the stars, I know quite well that for all they care I can go to hell.
00:04:28.080
But on earth in difference is the least we have to dread from man or beast.
00:04:33.840
How should we like it? We're stars to burn with a passion for us we could not return.
00:04:40.880
If equal affection cannot be, let the more loving one be me.
00:04:49.840
At my earth as I think I am of stars that do not give a damn, I cannot now I see them say,
00:04:57.520
"I missed one terribly all day." We're all stars to disappear or die. I should learn to look at
00:05:07.360
an empty sky and feel its total dark sublime, though this might take me a little time.
00:05:17.520
So the first thing I would remark is that we're all stars to disappear and die. The sky would not,
00:05:24.640
in fact, be empty, far from it. All the stars in the universe, as you know better than I do,
00:05:30.880
as well as all ordinary matter, make up only 5% of the universe's total contents.
00:05:36.800
The other 95% consists of dark matter, 27% and dark energy, 68%.
00:05:46.240
Dark matter and dark energy are the unseen forces that determine our cosmic destiny.
00:05:51.520
Yet the existence of dark matter has never actually been confirmed since no one so far has been
00:05:58.320
able to detect any dark matter particles. And here is where you come in because you, Maria Elena,
00:06:05.840
are at the forefront of a worldwide project that seeks to find hard scientific proof that dark
00:06:11.840
matter in fact exists. We have every reason to assume that it does exist. Yet it remains very elusive.
00:06:19.600
And why is that? What is it about dark matter that makes it so hidden from us?
00:06:25.280
So I'm going to give us a little tour of the fundamental forces of the universe in order to answer
00:06:33.440
this question so that we get a sense of what the order of the magnitude are. So as far as we know,
00:06:40.320
we, there are four fundamental forces that rule the fate of the universe. And when I say as far as
00:06:46.720
we know, it's important because those are the forces that affect our bodies, the earth, the sun,
00:06:53.520
which means these are the forces that affect protons, neutrons, and electrons, which is the stuff
00:06:59.600
you and I are made off the table, the chair I'm sitting on etc. So those forces are in order of
00:07:05.280
strength, the nuclear strength force, strong force, the electromagnetic force, the nuclear weak force,
00:07:11.440
and gravity. We have experience of most of them in our daily life. The weakest of those is gravity.
00:07:19.440
Gravity is the reason why I am firmly planted on the chair right now and I'm not floating through
00:07:24.320
the room. And we all experience gravity at all times. Gravity is the weakest, but it's the one that
00:07:30.000
has the biggest effect on the large scale because it's always addictive or it only has one sign and
00:07:37.120
the sign is always attractive. So basically if the universe was made by two protons for gravity,
00:07:44.000
they would eventually find each other and fall on each other. So then gravity,
00:07:49.760
accryts, things, things get bigger, the bigger they are, the more gravity they exert on each other.
00:07:56.160
Now we can go up on the one that we have an experience of which is electromagnetism.
00:08:01.440
Electromagnetism has positive and negative so it can be attractive or repulsive.
00:08:07.120
And basically its range is usually very limited because atoms tend to be neutral. So my body
00:08:13.920
as a whole is neutral, which again is why I'm not flying off the chair and sticking against the wall.
00:08:18.800
We don't have a charge. You know, we're doing a radio program so we're using electromagnetic waves
00:08:26.000
but I think the most cogent experience of the strength of electromagnetic force, which is how we know in
00:08:32.640
our daily life that is stronger than gravity is the chair is holding me up. The chair is solid
00:08:38.640
and this happens because the electrons in the atoms of the chair and the electrons in the
00:08:44.000
atom in my body repel each other repels each other. This is why the earth is very big but I'm
00:08:49.440
not falling through the chair. The chair is not falling through the ground. The building is not falling
00:08:53.760
to the center of the earth. So basically electromagnetism is what keeps things solid.
00:08:59.360
Thank goodness for electrons. Correct, yes. So then you can go the strongest scale I said earlier is
00:09:07.360
the nuclear strong force. That's what keeps the nuclei in a tone prevents them from decay,
00:09:14.800
from falling apart. So for example, the carbon in our bodies, which is in our DNA,
00:09:21.120
in our skin pretty much everywhere, is made of six protons, six neutrons, and six electrons. Usually
00:09:27.920
it can have one or two extra neutrons. The protons are, you know, six of them that would repel each
00:09:33.360
other because they have all positive charge and they are confined in a space of 10 to the minus
00:09:38.400
15 meters. The atom is about 10 to the minus 10 to the minus 15 is one million to the
00:09:44.240
billion to the meter. Sorry, I'm not saying this in miles. Forgive me, I want to call in Europe.
00:09:50.560
So it's a very small space in which you have a lot of charge that would repel each other.
00:09:59.200
So then you will need something that is stronger than the protons that then they repassion to hold
00:10:05.360
them together. And you know, it's a glue and we use the work glue for the carriers of the strong force.
00:10:11.520
This gives you an idea of how much stronger the strong force is compared to the electromagnetic force.
00:10:17.440
Then we have the weak one. The weak force with don't experience in daily life.
00:10:21.760
This is what allows for types of nucleot to the transforming to each other.
00:10:27.600
I think the glimpse of how weak the weak force is, we can get in two places. One is from nuclear waste.
00:10:36.800
When we have a nuclear reactor, we produce waste, the waste is around 400 or 1000 years or
00:10:42.960
million years. That is because those atoms settle using the weak force. And one way to say
00:10:49.680
weak is very slow. So it takes a very long time for those atoms to go back to stable state and not
00:10:55.680
be radioactive or we call radioactive. Another thing that is more common to our bodies is a small
00:11:02.640
fraction of our carbon because we breathe air that is affected by cosmic ray and a small fraction
00:11:08.560
of our carbon is carbon 14. And that stays around for a long time after we die, which is why we
00:11:14.800
can use carbon to date leaving organisms in archaeology. So it takes about 5000 years for the carbon
00:11:22.720
to go away. This isn't very indirect way to get the glimpse of how weak weak interaction is.
00:11:30.320
I don't have a more direct one because normally our atoms don't decay and so we don't see that
00:11:35.520
in regular life. So this is a premise of what the fundamental forces are.
00:11:40.560
Now we can ask, okay, dark matter and dark energy, how do they relate with the fundamental forces?
00:11:48.240
And please keep in mind those are the forces that we're subject to, but there might be other
00:11:52.560
things out in the universe that don't have these forces that interact completely independently
00:11:58.160
and by definition we will not be able to interact with them. So can I ask a clarification question?
00:12:03.600
Are the four forces fundamental forces of the universes that apply only to ordinary
00:12:09.120
baryonic matter? Namely the matter that we know stars and that five percent that I was talking about?
00:12:15.760
That's the perfect question I was about to get into this part of the of the conversation.
00:12:22.400
So dark energy which makes out makes up 70 percent of the matter energy density of the universe.
00:12:30.720
It's very weird to explain what dark energy is, is what is accelerating the expansion of the universe.
00:12:38.560
We think that it is a property of the metric that defines the universe, a problems, an intrinsic
00:12:45.920
property of space time. I know this is a very strange thing to say, but in other words it's a property
00:12:53.440
of gravity itself. So dark energy being a property of space time, it's a property of gravity,
00:13:00.720
and being a property of gravity it feels gravity, but if it's the gravity in the opposite,
00:13:07.120
we write it out in the equations as a negative pressure because you know gravity is what makes things,
00:13:12.880
the expansion of the universe slow down, makes things pile on each other, but dark energy is
00:13:18.800
doing the opposite effect. So in a way that can achieve the weakest, even though there is a lot of it,
00:13:25.360
and we say it's the weakest because it only shows on the scale that is beyond galaxy clusters.
00:13:31.440
It only shows in the global scale of the universe, and that's one of the reasons why it's so hard
00:13:37.280
to measure because the way we look at it is we see the expansion of the universe as it is now,
00:13:44.000
and then we can go back and look at the further subjects, and then we say, "Ah, you know,
00:13:50.000
10 billion years ago, galaxies, the universe was expanding more slowly than it is now,"
00:13:55.520
or we can look across directions and say, "Is it the same in every direction, etc., etc."
00:14:02.400
So then dark matter, I'm going to say something that's incorrect, but please bear with me,
00:14:09.360
is a little more intense than dark energy because we see it on a smaller scale.
00:14:14.240
So we see dark matter on a variety of scales, the smallest one of which is the galaxy,
00:14:19.200
we see it very clearly in cluster of galaxies in several different ways,
00:14:23.440
and we see its fingerprints on the universe. We see it in the
00:14:27.680
a spectra of the cosmic wave background, we see it in the primordial composition of the atoms that
00:14:33.360
came out of the Big Bang. So excuse me, but when you say we see it, are you speaking metaphorically?
00:14:39.920
Because what does it mean to see dark matter? I thought we don't have any actual,
00:14:45.520
scopic evidence for it. Fantastic, we can measure its effects.
00:14:51.760
Right, okay. So for example, they do turn on fraction from the primordial,
00:14:56.720
from the Big Bang. You know, the composition, the primordial composition of the universe was fixed
00:15:01.840
in the first 20 minutes after the Big Bang event, and you know, we know that matter, we would have
00:15:07.440
75% hydrogen, 25% helium by mass, but instead we have traces of duturon in there,
00:15:14.640
and we think that this happened because dark matter was so abandoned in the durley universe
00:15:21.520
that it diluted dutur on a bit. So not all the dutur burned up in the
00:15:26.480
Big Bang and turned into helium. So is that one of the biggest effects that people point to
00:15:33.600
for the existence of dark matter? Not really. This is one of the one of the effects that cannot be
00:15:39.520
explained by modified gravity. Okay. That's one of the interesting ones. The biggest ones that we
00:15:45.200
all know and that, you know, have been observed more or less for a hundred years is the dynamic of
00:15:51.600
large scale objects in the universe, such as the galaxy or clusters of galaxy. So for example,
00:15:57.600
if you take a photo, it's not a photo recording of how things rotate in a spiral galaxy, such as
00:16:04.640
Andromeda, such as the Triangolong, which is where it was originally measured by Virrobin in the 1970s,
00:16:12.160
you see that the galaxy kind of rotates like a solid object, but there is a near-linaf mass to
00:16:18.560
explain the rotation in that way. So that is the original evidence for dark matter. This is on
00:16:23.840
the galaxy. A hundred years ago, it was sort of guessed by Fritz Suki who came up with the name
00:16:30.880
Dungkele Materia, Dark Matter in German. And so that's the dynamic of how things rotate around
00:16:37.840
shows that there is a lot of matter that we cannot see. Now, dark matter is not really dark,
00:16:43.920
it's more like transparent. It's more like a viscose substance in the universe, like molasses,
00:16:51.600
the slow things down. That's the fact that we observe. And they say transparent because it doesn't
00:16:58.160
shine and it doesn't shade. So I'm hoping the most of us would have observed in Milky Way and
00:17:05.040
night at least once. And you see a big dark streak in the middle of the Milky Way. That is
00:17:11.440
interstellar gas. That is the dark stuff. And we see it in a way. Even with our eyes, we see it as a
00:17:19.120
shade. Dark matter is not dead. It's not something that prevents the-- it's between us and the light
00:17:25.840
and absorbs the electromagnetic radiation. Dark matter is completely unaffected by electromagnetic
00:17:32.640
radiation. Does it make light? Does an absorb light? The interesting bit here is I've talked about
00:17:38.960
the gravitational effects of Dark Matter. We know for sure that he has the gravitational interaction.
00:17:44.720
But very tantalizing. Let's say it's circumstantial evidence from the dynamics of the big
00:17:53.840
bank and how the universe cool down in the first few seconds is that Dark Matter may or might
00:18:00.480
have the weak interaction. So that's what we're going after because if he has the weak interaction,
00:18:07.520
we can make it interact with our nuclei, nuclei now, detector, nuclei, inazics, etc., etc.
00:18:13.360
We know that this is extremely rare, but that's what some of the experiments are chasing because
00:18:20.640
it's the joke about the drunk person looking for their keys under the lamp. Why are you looking
00:18:27.040
there? Because I can. Yes. So we're looking with the weak interaction because we can,
00:18:32.320
most of all, but also because if you rewind the move of the big bank to hit the density that
00:18:39.760
would explain the amount of Dark Matter that we see right now, we hit a range of temperature,
00:18:45.520
which is the characteristic temperature of the weak interaction. So basically Dark Matter would
00:18:51.280
have the couple from the primordial universe, same time as the neutrino, so around second one from
00:18:57.920
the big bank event. So that's the reason why we go after it with the weak interaction.
00:19:03.200
So if I understand properly, the Dark Matter was generated as a result of the big bang like
00:19:11.120
ordinary matter. Correct. Yeah. And Dark Energy also owes its genesis to the big bang.
00:19:19.520
So maybe we can break out the order if that is interesting. Sure. So first, very, very first
00:19:26.720
fraction of the big bang was what we think this phenomenon, which is inflation, which is where space
00:19:32.160
time unraveled. Space time has property gravity and therefore dark energy. So dark energy was
00:19:40.480
there from second to the monastery of the universe. Second, 10 to the monastery, second is where
00:19:46.880
physics break down. But in the very first distance, dark energy was there. Then the universe up to
00:19:53.280
10 to the minus 12 seconds from the beginning. Again, I'm saying very small numbers was a quark
00:19:58.720
glue on plasma. So strong forces the first one that decoupled and then by second one,
00:20:04.160
electromagnetism and weak force had decoupled from gravity from other forces from each other.
00:20:12.560
Let's say or from the vacuum, which is a whole other thing, but that's when they show up.
00:20:19.200
And so in the first second, the photons is created the electron, the neutrino, and the dark matter
00:20:25.040
particle if there is such a thing. And I didn't explain what we're looking for a particle,
00:20:30.800
but because we see a gravitational effect that is attractive, this thing has mass and has mass
00:20:38.960
the way, you know, I have mass and I'm not flying around the room now.
00:20:43.040
Okay, so if it has mass, is it here with us? Is it in the studio? Is it coming between us? Or is it
00:20:54.880
even in our bodies without it interacting with the ordinary matter? Where is its location?
00:21:02.320
Correct. So it's in the galaxy. It's what is holding the galaxy together. Now this sun is
00:21:08.880
rotating around the center of the galaxy at around 150, 160 miles per second, I'm going to say.
00:21:16.720
And so we're slamming against a wind of dark matter, which is going through us.
00:21:22.880
In a standard model of dark matter, it is about a particle per liter. So, you know, three to five
00:21:29.840
particles are going through our head at any given second. And they go quite fast, so it's about a
00:21:35.840
billion per second to go through our bodies at any given time. Of dark matter. Of dark matter.
00:21:41.040
And they don't bother us because they don't, they're completely indifferent to
00:21:46.320
to our ordinary matter. So that is the question, how in different are they to ordinary matter?
00:21:55.040
Do they have a weight on track with us through the weak force? Which then would mean, you know,
00:22:01.440
maybe one particle of dark matter will interact with the nuclei of my body through my entire life.
00:22:07.280
Okay. Order of magnitude.
00:22:09.600
And it's that possibility that there is one particle even, you know,
00:22:17.200
astray, almost impossible to find. But I gather that your research is focused on trying to locate
00:22:25.120
those particles and certify that they are actually interacting there in the whimp, the weak,
00:22:38.400
weakly interactive massive particles. And if there is a detection of dark matter,
00:22:46.240
the particular particle of dark matter, it would be the whimp in the whimp force, right?
00:22:52.560
So that is what I'm looking for. My team is looking for. There are other models that are harder to
00:22:57.760
look for. Let's say that if dark matter has any type of interaction with regular matter,
00:23:03.920
we can rewind to the conditions close to the big bank event. So then you can do three things.
00:23:12.240
You can have regular particles called light and I late create other particles, one of which
00:23:17.280
could be dark matter, which is what the people at CERN are trying to do, make dark matter in the lab.
00:23:22.800
Or you can look at very dense regions in the universe, such as the center of the galaxy or the center
00:23:29.680
of the sun, and observe the opposite event, which is two particles of dark matter annihilating
00:23:35.680
two regular particles or photons. And then there's a third wave, which is the Skederex
00:23:42.160
experiment, which is Billier Ball, basically two things hit each other and they change trajectory,
00:23:49.280
they exchange momentum, they exchange velocity. One thing that we don't think of when we play
00:23:55.440
Billier and the balls hit each other, this is an exchange of electromagnetic force,
00:24:01.680
it's still the electrons that repel each other. Otherwise the balls will go through each other,
00:24:06.480
they will be transparent to each other. So same thing with dark matter and nuclei in a detector,
00:24:11.280
we want them to scatter an exchange of momentum or energy or velocity between them.
00:24:17.600
And so, sorry, what was the question again? Well, the detection of the particle,
00:24:26.320
it sounds like you have to get very lucky if you're going to detect such a particle of dark matter.
00:24:32.560
Is that not the case? That's correct. So we have been looking at, we've taken the cross-section that
00:24:39.600
we expect from the beginning of the universe and build the detector around that cross-section.
00:24:45.200
And basically we kind of treat it like a neutrino, so something that you make a big detector
00:24:50.160
and it will interact extremely rarely. And so three, four, five, depending how you count,
00:24:56.960
generation of detectors have not seen evidence of these collisions. The experiment that we're
00:25:02.160
running now, which is the Luxx Zeppelin, has 10 tons of liquid xenon, a liquid xenon.
00:25:09.760
And I can say a few words about why liquid xenon in a second, but we waited for several months
00:25:17.120
and we know that there are 10 billion of particles going through the detector every second
00:25:22.640
and none of them have interacted with my nuclei of liquid xenon in a three-month observation.
00:25:28.240
Now we're going to do a three-year observation and then, you know, the more you go down in sensitivity,
00:25:33.440
the more you know about the type of interaction that you might have.
00:25:38.080
So in three years you're hoping maybe to get one or two interactions.
00:25:41.760
Maybe like a dozen, couple dozen, if nature cooperates.
00:25:46.160
And if you do get a dozen, will that prove the existence of dark matter?
00:25:51.600
In my view, we already proved the existence of dark matter based on its effect.
00:25:57.040
The detection will prove that he has the weak interaction and that it's a particle
00:26:03.520
and it will give us an idea, a feel for the mass of the particle, of the mass range of the particle.
00:26:09.920
Yeah. Don't you find that we live in a very bizarre universe, from our point of view,
00:26:17.760
human ordinary matter point of view, where we look out and see, I mean endless galaxies with the
00:26:27.040
James Webb telescope now, it's just staggering and overwhelming how many
00:26:32.880
super clusters of galaxies, how many galaxies, how many stars, it's countless.
00:26:40.000
And yet we're told that that's just a side story and a very minor side story and that the real
00:26:49.920
Agon is between dark matter and dark energy, which are again relatively indifferent to us.
00:26:57.200
And if the universe is going to end in some kind of thermal death, it's going to be because of the
00:27:03.920
triumph of dark energy over dark matter or if we can postpone however long,
00:27:12.400
you know, that final thermal death is going to be thanks to the effect of dark matter.
00:27:17.840
And I think that more people know about this story, this invisible story, the more I think we would,
00:27:26.160
I feel like I have to align myself with dark matter against dark energy.
00:27:30.880
Because dark energy is the force of entropy, I don't know if I'm using these terms in a proper
00:27:37.840
scientific sense, but there is something entropic about dark energy, which is trying to
00:27:46.640
push everything apart to the point where the center does not hold.
00:27:51.680
Yeah, so there are two comments that I will make to your question. The first one is what you
00:27:58.480
call bizarre, I call job security. And I'm like deadly serious here, although it's a joke,
00:28:05.120
because when I was in grad school for particle physics, I was in between my masters and my doctorate.
00:28:11.440
So we have this model that I described earlier, it's called the standard model of particle
00:28:16.160
physics that describes all the particle, all the interactions, etc, etc. And this is one of the great
00:28:22.480
intellectual triumphs of 20th century, it explains everything is very accurate. So I was going
00:28:28.640
to school for particle physics and I was told there are a couple of twinks that we need to put
00:28:33.600
to the standard model, but we're almost there. Physics is very close to complete.
00:28:38.880
And one of the questions was the density of the universe. That was a big question in the late 90s,
00:28:44.320
because it's the parameter that tells us what the universe will have at thermal death,
00:28:49.360
expand forever, or have a big crunch. So we made the measurement in 2001 by the way this was led by
00:28:56.560
Professor Jerome, by any Italian lead group. And they made the measurement, we didn't know the
00:29:03.120
order of magnitude of the density and they came out, this is a hundred plus or minus two, which was
00:29:09.440
amazing. And then they were like, oh, and by the way, 95% of this stuff, we don't know what it is,
00:29:16.240
we don't know what it's made of, we don't know where it comes from. That was a very good time
00:29:21.040
to start the career in particle physics, because throughout school I've been told,
00:29:25.280
and there is very little to figure out, and now I'm like, now most of it we don't know what it is.
00:29:30.880
Is this thing with like the sciences or anything in reality where you're like, all more almost there,
00:29:36.880
it's like hiking, you're at the peak and then you get to the peak and you're like, oh no,
00:29:41.360
that's not where I was going, there is a whole another valley and then all another peak.
00:29:45.760
So I like this part of the universe in which it's playing with us a little bit not on purpose.
00:29:52.800
So that's...
00:29:54.000
No, I know. Yeah, it's perfectly fascinating if you're in the business of discovery and in the
00:29:59.680
business of adventure and venturing into the unknown in particular, and there seems to be a lot of it,
00:30:09.040
a lot of it out there.
00:30:09.920
And then, sorry, I'm interrupting you, but the other side of your question about dark matter
00:30:16.480
is that dark matter seeded the density fluctuations very early in the universe, in the first
00:30:24.080
thousands of the universe that allowed for large scale structure formation, and then on that was built,
00:30:32.640
you know galaxies and stars.
00:30:34.160
Everything were made of except for the hydrogen was made inside of a star.
00:30:40.080
The iron in our blood which allows us to break was made in a supernova explosion.
00:30:46.160
None of those things would happen without dark matter because the universe doesn't have enough
00:30:51.200
regular matter to counteract basically the violence of the explosion of the big bank.
00:30:56.080
So this is a very moving thing to me that, you know, there is this thing we don't interact with.
00:31:02.640
We don't know what it is, we don't know where it comes from, but without it, we wouldn't be here
00:31:07.520
to have the conversation in a way. And, you know, this is to agree with you that dark matter is better
00:31:13.680
than dark energy for like what we are concerned.
00:31:16.640
As far as we're concerned, yes.
00:31:21.040
So now I'm going to ask a very speculative question, which I'm assuming you are not going to be able to
00:31:26.800
answer scientifically, but if you think of the big bang as an inflation invent, was dark energy,
00:31:34.960
the prime mover of the big bang?
00:31:36.800
No dark energy was a product. Now we are speculating a little bit between container and content.
00:31:48.080
Yeah. So dark energy is a property of the container and everything that we are is the content,
00:31:54.480
including photons that is light. But so we believe or believe is a strong word, but we
00:32:02.720
hypothesize that the universe, the big bang was a quantum fluctuation. Now there is a very
00:32:10.240
interesting-- Can you explain what is a quantum fluctuation?
00:32:13.360
There is this very interesting concept in quantum physics, which is the word vacuum. Vacuum is not empty.
00:32:19.680
It is a sea of potentiality to use the Aristotelian expression. It's like looking out at a
00:32:26.000
column lake that is flat, but you know, if there is wind, you're going to see very big waves.
00:32:30.320
So basically what we know is that they fear means. So all the particles they were made of
00:32:35.520
are represented in quantum physics by harmonic oscillations. The ground state of their
00:32:41.360
harmonical oscillations is not zero. It's half a particle. So if we have the vacuum, which is the place
00:32:47.840
where all the forces exist and all the particles exist is a big word. But is the place where the
00:32:54.720
rules of physics exist? Then it's not empty because it has half a particle of every possible
00:33:01.760
particle in every point. And the particles pop in and out of existence continuously,
00:33:08.320
and that's-- Even before the big bang. That I don't have an answer to. But it is possible,
00:33:15.520
so I'm going to say what remains that they pop in and out of the existence continuously,
00:33:19.440
and then we can go back to the big bang. There is a formulation of the uncertainty principle,
00:33:25.760
which is energy and time. Energy in certain tune energy and uncertainty of time is always bigger
00:33:32.320
than a certain number. That means that you can give whatever energy you want as long as you take away
00:33:38.960
fast enough. So basically this is the concept of virtual particles. Particles popping in and out of
00:33:45.840
the void and dying so fast of the vacuum and dying and going back so fast that you can violate
00:33:52.400
the laws of physics basically. You can violate conservation of energy if you do it fast enough.
00:33:57.200
That's what the quantum fluctuation is. If you give enough energy, the particle becomes real. It's
00:34:03.440
really extracted from the void. We say it's the marshal, and that's how the colliders work. Basically,
00:34:10.640
you know, you annihilate particle, you produce a bunch of energy, send it into the vacuum,
00:34:16.160
and they will extract existing virtual particles and make them real. It is possible that
00:34:22.640
that's what happened at the big bang event. That there was a vacuum with fields that was
00:34:29.680
probed with enough energy to bring something of the marshal, made something real, which was the
00:34:36.160
entire universe. And I know this sounds very esoteric, but I don't know how else to explain.
00:34:45.120
I'm assuming that you relate to the universe with a certain wonder and awe. It's very difficult not to
00:34:54.080
have a sense of awe and wonder. But at the same time, the more I learn about how these forces work
00:35:04.560
and how stars are born and what nuclear fusion is, the more
00:35:12.400
in a matchably violent is this universe that we live in. And I almost go back now and I'm
00:35:21.040
seduced by the Mannequi in worldview, which is that a universe that is the product of this extreme
00:35:30.480
collisions that are happening all the time. And the annihilation of antimatter by matter and the
00:35:38.320
annihilation of particle by another particle and one kind of molecule turns into another molecule.
00:35:47.440
All this is the result of an extraordinary violence and the Mannequi and ideas that this
00:35:52.640
created world cannot be created by benevolent God. It has to be created by some other
00:35:58.240
demonic force. Sometimes in my darker moods, it seems to me that this universe has a very,
00:36:08.000
very violent character that doesn't seem to conform to the notion of it's certainly not
00:36:17.040
Dante's universe of the perfect circular motions and the utter serenity of the heavenly spheres
00:36:25.840
where everything is nestled and embedded one sphere into the other and it's all moved by the
00:36:33.280
love of the creator and the creator, you know, Lamorca,
00:36:36.400
more of the love that moves the sun and the other stars were far from that kind of
00:36:43.840
universities days. And it seems like the more we learn about it, the more violent it gets.
00:36:48.640
So the violent is paradoxically very hospitable to life and it's something that we don't
00:36:56.640
understand at the fundamental level. I mentioned it earlier, I run the mix up the hemoglobin of my
00:37:04.320
blood is what allows us to breathe. It was made in a supernova explosion. That is the most violent
00:37:11.200
event in the universe that we can think of. I think even worse is the neutrinos, the neutron stars,
00:37:18.160
which if the heavier elements and iron come from these incredible collisions of neutron stars,
00:37:23.680
even worse. I was about to get there, right? If all the iron in our blood comes from a supernova,
00:37:29.600
that to me is very moving, that we come from something very violent. And you know, when the sun
00:37:35.520
dies in four and a half billion years around the same time, the Milky Way will merge with the
00:37:40.880
Andromeda galaxy. So it will kick off new star formation and you know, maybe the whatever comes after
00:37:48.160
the sun will be in a binary system and maybe next round my iron will get to be gold and maybe in
00:37:55.440
10 billion years there will be a life form which is silly conveys instead of carbon based and it will
00:38:01.040
use gold for breathing. That to me is mesmerizing and it's violent but not in a way that I perceive
00:38:08.640
as hostile. Well then if we're a little part here, you know, because we're a tiny little part is
00:38:16.720
someone that almost every Italian has in his or her blood, he's the great pessimist of the 19th century.
00:38:25.120
And he's, if he were here with us here in the discussion, he would ask, will it have been worth it
00:38:32.880
when our blood is made of gold and not a virus? Is life itself not a horrible mistake of the universe?
00:38:44.800
In so far as for all that's miraculous, tensions is a condition essentially of suffering and of
00:38:53.840
exposure to peril, to risk, to collision, conflict and the perpetual possibility of annihilation
00:39:06.160
that threatens every living thing. So if one were to take a layo-parrity and pessimistic
00:39:11.680
view of things then perhaps the price is too high to pay. Now we're getting off topic here
00:39:20.000
in another sort of speculative space but it's based on what we know of the fact that nothing happens
00:39:32.640
unless there is some kind of explosion, some kind of collision, some kind of annihilation. I mean
00:39:38.400
it seems like there's no birth without the violent death. So if we ask the question of where all this
00:39:51.520
comes from and not just from a technical point of view how we can explain what the big bang is,
00:39:57.680
I find it that I'm a bit in a state of perplexity about is it indeed all contingent
00:40:09.280
and accidental and...
00:40:13.680
So maybe I have two things to say to that. One is where the universe knows in itself
00:40:24.320
that is what makes it worthwhile. There is a Pascal quote that I don't remember of the top of my
00:40:30.080
head but it's something along those lines of all the bodies, the planets, the fear, momentum,
00:40:35.600
no worth, the smallest intelligence because the smallest intelligence knows the bodies and knows itself.
00:40:41.440
And so there is this idea of knowledge is what makes the universe worth it and the suffering that
00:40:48.480
comes with it. It's yeah, that was a good point. Now because I'm a practice.
00:40:54.640
Okay but now before the next one I want to hear about the practicing but Pascal because he also is
00:41:00.640
famous for his dictum Lucid al-Sétéd-Nél de Césésésésésésésésésésésésésémfé néméfé. The eternal silence of these infinite
00:41:11.360
spaces terrifies me. That was the new world, the post-copernequin world that he was reacting to.
00:41:17.680
So there's a terror and all that we have to also keep in mind for invoking Pascal. Please continue
00:41:24.320
your second point. No, I agree with Pascal. Now we know that the universe is not silent,
00:41:29.760
it's hamming in gravitational waves. So that's a little more comforting if you wish.
00:41:35.680
And also like the word awesome means both meanings, scary and exciting. Now I'm a practicing
00:41:45.840
Catholic and so for example if you think about evolution, evolution works because there is death.
00:41:52.720
Yes. It's not great, it's not a great mechanism. I don't know why God chose the mechanism of
00:41:59.920
evolution to get two beings that were self-aware and capable of good and evil capable of
00:42:06.560
loving God. I don't know why he went that route. But yeah. Well the question
00:42:16.880
for a practicing Catholic is whether you believe that God is the creator of the universe, whether he's
00:42:24.560
in the universe or whether the universe is a faithful reflection of his essence or nature or whether
00:42:35.360
on the contrary it's a disfigure and disfiguring reflection of whatever we mean by God when we use it.
00:42:44.000
I think that the universe is a sign which is the sign does not contain the significant
00:42:52.000
outside of the sacraments for those of us who are Catholic or outside the person of Christ who was
00:42:57.200
God incarnate. So it tells us by an analogy what God is like. So I'm going to say another
00:43:06.560
autobiographical thing. I have heaped disease, I've had 13 surgeries so far. First time I had
00:43:13.040
surgery I was eight years old, I was out of the second grade. I had surgery spent the summer of my
00:43:19.680
grandparents' deck and every day I watched the sunset and you know I had to be sitting in the
00:43:26.560
summer and not playing around with the chilli other children to watch the sunset every single day
00:43:32.160
and they noticed that the position where the sun was setting was slightly different, it was moving
00:43:38.720
and you know as an eight years old in Italy I observed with my own eyes the rotation of the earth
00:43:45.120
which was marvelous and that to me the fact that the earth rotates around the sun is very regular,
00:43:52.960
it's very predictable and eight years old can watch it and eight years old can know where the sun
00:43:58.240
is going to be the next day with my experience of being recovering from surgery and you know
00:44:03.760
feeling lonely because my friends were playing outside this predictability of the universe is very
00:44:11.280
tied to my experience of suffering in a way the two things go together and they're comforting
00:44:18.720
and you know I'm not saying anything new it's I'm telling you my experience of the book of job
00:44:24.240
which is 3000 years old but there is a comfort that comes from looking outside of us.
00:44:31.360
No that I agree it's a comfort that comes from a sense if I understand you correctly of stability
00:44:38.880
and permanence which is a condition that doesn't pertain to us because we are
00:44:43.520
evanescent we are temporary and our lives are characterized by a great deal of instability
00:44:49.360
and impermanence. The universe was that eternal permanent stable place and of course
00:44:58.480
from a terrestrial point of view of one human lifetime it still is relatively permanent because
00:45:05.360
as far as we know the earth is still going to rotate in the same way around the sun for the foreseeable future
00:45:13.200
but when you look at the moon which is also rotating you know around the earth and then you find out
00:45:19.520
what is the origin of the moon it was like a horrible collision I mean a terrible body
00:45:27.920
extra you know terrestrial body that slammed into the earth and took one third of the body of the planet
00:45:34.880
and that one third comes out there and it eventually becomes the moon so all those poems to the
00:45:42.240
moon and the beauty and yeah it seems to have stability but its history is very unstable and we know
00:45:49.840
that you know the earth could be slammed at any moment and its rotation you know and the fact that
00:45:56.960
we have seasons is actually I think a product of that collision if I'm not mistaken no the fact that we
00:46:03.440
have seasons and they are not completely devastating on our climate so they'll moon is what
00:46:09.200
fixes their rotation angle of the earth to 23.5 degrees plus or minus 5 degrees all the other
00:46:16.160
planets go randomly between 0 and 90 during their orbit there is nothing that holds them there
00:46:22.160
and so like the moon is one of the main this violent event is one of the many reasons that keeps us
00:46:28.720
alive right and this is what I'm trying to say is that the irony is that you you can sit out there
00:46:34.240
and look at the at the moon at the you know the sunset every December you see that the earth is
00:46:39.600
rotating it it's an amazing and there's beauty everywhere you look in the in the cosmos and yet
00:46:45.200
the meaning of it is all absurd in a certain you can say from a certain point of view
00:46:51.280
that you ask what is the purpose where is it going well it's death thermal death things like it's not the sort of
00:46:56.320
narrative that you get in Christian catholic catechism like you and I had it is a very ironic
00:47:05.760
and maybe even tragically ironic disconnect between the sheer beauty and sense of transcendent grace
00:47:14.640
of the created world with the sort of seemingly purposeless ongoing
00:47:25.520
interaction of the four forces leading us into what Nietzsche called the great unknown X of
00:47:34.160
you know it is certainly paradoxical I agree with you that we are here because of violence
00:47:43.120
the cosmic scale at the same time if you think about the big bank or any of these violent events
00:47:50.000
it reminds me that we didn't have to be here because the universe the fact that he had the beginning
00:47:57.200
reality didn't have to be there and you know I don't want to make it therefore there is a
00:48:02.800
creator but the fact that I'm here if I look at the universe is very non obvious and so even paradoxically
00:48:11.920
it makes me a little bit great for for the supernova that made the iron that allows me to breathe
00:48:18.240
because it didn't have to to happen that way so does your work as a scientist
00:48:25.600
fortify your catholic faith or is it too completely separate domains that don't touch each other
00:48:36.720
I think they inspire each other in a way that's analogical it's not you know an
00:48:43.120
at least it's not right it's not analytical it's not even philosophical if you want but it's like
00:48:51.040
you know my love for poetry enforce my work as a scientist and my work for scientists shines a new
00:48:56.960
light on the stuff I read you know they all didn't think that you read I'm like oh this is beautiful
00:49:02.560
but that's not what's gonna happen to the earth they all go together and they method of
00:49:08.880
the method of curiosity are the same method for every field of knowledge including
00:49:15.760
faith or including biology right that's what's right and you know why do we know at all
00:49:23.520
why do we even want to do science that's not the question that can be answered with
00:49:28.560
science and all of my colleagues would give their life to find out what that matter is but why would
00:49:35.680
they that matter doesn't explain that so that's how they go together for me that's beautifully
00:49:42.640
put that that's great I you know I I'm reminded now of the end of a television series
00:49:55.120
true detective season one maybe some of our listeners have seen it and
00:50:01.200
it's a very dark show it's about evil and nihilism and and the
00:50:06.560
again focusing on the on the meaningless the absurdity of the University of life and
00:50:12.720
the unredeem quality of it but and yet at the end in the very last episode
00:50:20.640
at the for the conclusion Nik Pizzo lato he's another Italian he's from Louisiana but
00:50:26.640
I tell you I know how it's like brilliant degree in philosophy it's very strange because he the
00:50:35.760
ending is that the detective there's a pair of detective and it's been shot and he had a near
00:50:42.160
death experience in fact he seemed to have gone down for a while into the dark of death
00:50:47.280
and he comes back and he's in the hospital and his partner comes to see him and take him to the car
00:50:54.320
and
00:50:55.280
Russ one of the two the wounded one one to a near death experience looks he says you know when I was up
00:51:02.720
there in that hospital room I was looking out at the sky every night and I and I realized that
00:51:07.920
there's only just one story and Marty
00:51:14.320
says yeah and what's that it's light against dark
00:51:19.200
the partner looks up at the sky he says I don't know about Alaska because Russ also grew up in Alaska
00:51:28.240
but it looks to me like the dark has a lot more territory
00:51:31.360
and then he takes him to the car and then Russ says yeah but you're looking at it all wrong
00:51:38.320
said okay how's that well in the beginning there was only darkness and so it seems to me like the
00:51:47.200
light is winning okay that's a very edifying way to end a program it also has a Christian kind of
00:51:57.440
a Christian message if you want that it's good against evil and that you know there's a
00:52:05.920
victory of light against dark and that it might be indeed the case that the future will redeem
00:52:13.360
all the violence and suffering of the past but we know from what you told us about dark energy
00:52:21.760
that in the final analysis it might be that you know that dark that dark matter can put up a
00:52:27.840
heroic resistance but it seems like dark energy is winning the game and that there's going to be
00:52:34.320
eventually a lot more darkness in the sky than light simply because the further away the galaxies
00:52:41.280
get from us the more its light is shifted into the you know the red the red shifting and the more
00:52:48.640
the sky is going to become dark rather than light so it's a very edifying ending but at the same
00:52:57.200
time it opens up some questions that are at the heart of the topic that we've been discussing today
00:53:02.080
about these two forces that are controlling our cosmic destiny
00:53:07.680
right and this says that our time in the universe is finite yeah because darkness will win
00:53:16.000
and that's not a bad thing no talking talks talks about death as the gift of mortal
00:53:23.520
two humans he says you know it's a bitter gift well in fact the the notion of a beginning
00:53:32.000
has to imply death and if a universe had a beginning you know it has it has to have its death and
00:53:38.320
Natality is the what we get in exchange for mortality so and darkness I don't think is necessarily
00:53:47.040
bad at all and even rust the character in true detective knows that because he tells earlier he
00:53:54.640
tells his partner that when he was there in in you know very close to death and even cross the line
00:54:01.440
he felt this darkness and that there was a he says it's there was a darkness under the dark and
00:54:06.880
it's like a warm substance and what he felt in that substance was love his daughter his father
00:54:14.320
his you know the his dead daughter and that there is a sense that in that darkness is not the
00:54:21.840
nihilistic nothingness but some other kind of almost in concealable love that that he was feeling so
00:54:29.280
he's in a certain sense betraying his own insight in his statement that the light is winning because
00:54:35.840
maybe you know the as you say it darkness is not an unhappy ending for the story
00:54:46.720
Maria de Naut Monzani has been a pleasure talking to you today on entitled opinions about dark matter
00:54:52.080
and much more besides I think that we have to have a follow-up discussion if you're willing to
00:54:58.880
come back and join us thank you this was very fun okay i'm Robert Harrison for entitled opinions
00:55:05.680
thanks for listening
00:55:07.680
[Music]
00:55:17.680
[Music]
00:55:27.680
[Music]
00:55:37.680
[Music]
00:55:47.680
[Music]
00:55:57.680
[Music]
00:56:07.680
[Music]
00:56:17.680
[Music]
00:56:27.680
[Music]
00:56:37.680
[Music]
00:56:47.680
[Music]
00:56:53.680
[Music]
00:57:03.680
[Music]
00:57:13.680
[Music]
00:57:23.680
[Music]
00:57:33.680
[Music]
00:57:43.680
[Music]
00:57:53.680
[Music]
00:58:01.680
[Music]
00:58:21.680
[Music]
00:58:31.680
[Music]
00:58:41.680
[Music]
00:58:51.680
[Music]
00:58:57.680
[Music]
00:59:07.680
[Music]
00:59:17.680
[Music]
00:59:27.680
[Music]
00:59:37.680
[Music]
00:59:47.680
[Music]
00:59:53.680
[Music]
01:00:03.680
[Music]
01:00:13.680
[Music]
01:00:23.680
[Music]
01:00:33.680
[Music]
01:00:43.680
[Music]
01:00:53.680
[Music]
01:01:03.680
[Music]
01:01:13.680
[Music]
01:01:23.680
[Music]
01:01:33.680
[Music]
01:01:43.680
[Music]