table of contents

07/28/2023

Amor Mundi: Robert Harrison on World Love

A monologue in which our host, Professor Robert Harrison, reflects on different kinds of human love, and above all, love of the world.

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[Music]
00:00:17.000
In title opinions coming to you after another long hiatus,
00:00:21.200
coming to you from the scorched earth of a Luciferian summer,
00:00:25.760
coming to you with the fresh air of free thinking,
00:00:29.360
that means coming to you from KZSU on the Stanford campus,
00:00:34.320
and we're coming to you today with an equal admixture of sadness and gladness.
00:00:40.720
Sadness because our beloved producer, Vithori Amollo,
00:00:44.640
whose dedication and devotion to entitled opinions has been unconditional over the past seven years,
00:00:51.120
has decided to move on.
00:00:54.000
Gladness because Vithoriya has accepted a really attractive offer to teach at SMU.
00:00:59.440
She's on her way to Dallas as we speak, and on behalf of the entire brigade,
00:01:05.120
I would like to wish her the very best in her Vithanwoba.
00:01:08.720
Vithoriya, you will be sorely missed. You have been a blessing for this weird and wandering show we
00:01:16.080
call in title opinions. Thank you for all you've done over the years to help it thrive.
00:01:21.440
The person who's taking over from Vithoriya and who's now sitting in her chair next to me is
00:01:30.240
Thai Devidian, such are the ways of apostolic succession. Thai is a graduate student in our Italian
00:01:37.920
studies program. He's about to begin his third year, and we're delighted that he will become
00:01:43.600
the new managing producer of this radio show and podcast. Welcome aboard, Thai.
00:01:48.560
[Music]
00:02:00.560
Since we're dedicating today's show to Vithoriya, I would like to share a few thoughts about some of
00:02:06.240
the sentiments that fall under the rubric of that big and sprawling word in English love.
00:02:14.160
An all-encompassing word that encvers many kinds of bonds and emotions.
00:02:18.960
Unlike English, ancient Greek had some eight different terms for love.
00:02:24.800
Vithi Liya, or the affection one feels for friends, relatives, and fellow citizens.
00:02:31.360
Eros, passionate desire that covets its object. Agape, the self-sacrificing,
00:02:39.520
unconditional love of a mother for her child, for instance, or of God's love for man,
00:02:46.080
regardless of merit. Then their storga, familiar love, mania, obsessive love,
00:02:53.040
ludus, playful love, zinnia, guest, or hospitality love, and finally, feel outia, self-love.
00:03:01.600
Eight is better than one to be sure, yet we would need even more than that to cover the many
00:03:08.720
different kinds of human love, some of which go unacknowledged precisely because we don't have proper names for them.
00:03:16.640
Now some years ago, I coined the term chlorophilia. I believe I used it for the very first time in an
00:03:25.120
entitled opinions show on Epicurus with my colleague Andrea Nightingale back in 2005.
00:03:32.960
Chlorophilia belongs under the more general rubric of bio-philia, which is a term that the biologist
00:03:39.760
Edward O. Wilson introduced in 1984 to designate our innate sense of kinship with other life forms
00:03:47.760
above all mammals. Chlorophilia is more specific. It refers to our basic human need for the presence
00:03:55.760
of plant life in our surrounding environments. With a few exceptions here and there,
00:04:01.920
a lack of greenery is one of the curses of most modern metropoluses,
00:04:07.040
and it comes with psychological consequences. Most of us succumb to a corrosive existential
00:04:15.200
mallets when we find ourselves for long periods of time in habitats deprived of vegetation.
00:04:23.920
A mallet is that often goes undiagnosed or attributed to other causes. Without central park in its midst,
00:04:32.960
New York City would probably go insane. The same holds true for many other big cities with major parks
00:04:40.560
or gardens to save them from utter urban despair. Is Chlorophilia a human universal? Probably not.
00:04:50.720
I'm sure there are fifty people on any given block of Wall Street who can do without plant life
00:04:56.240
around them. Yet even they, if they make enough money, tend to return to homes in well-wooded
00:05:03.120
suburbs or neighborhoods, if only because their spouses and peers are not exceptions to the rule.
00:05:10.400
Why are most of us chlorophylls? It may have to do with the fact that plants are, like us,
00:05:18.800
eukirotic organisms, in other words, they have cells with a nucleus, as opposed to pro-chirotic
00:05:26.080
organisms who cells don't have a nucleus. Of the three main domains of life, eukirota,
00:05:33.920
bacteria, and archaea, animals and plants belong to the first. So when we humans enter a meadow,
00:05:41.840
a forest or a garden, there's a homecoming aspect about it, a reunion with our biotic kin, as it were.
00:05:49.680
Chlorophilia may also have something to do with the fact that photosynthesis is as essential to life
00:05:58.080
as air and water. All living things with the exception of those in hot vents on the ocean
00:06:04.960
floor depend in one way or another on a molecule with a magnesium atom in a porphyrin ring that
00:06:13.600
enabled plants to turn sunlight into sugar. This chlorophyll molecule absorbs energy from the blue and
00:06:22.080
red parts of the solar spectrum, but not from the green middle. If the molecule were more efficient,
00:06:30.240
if plants were able to devour all of the solar spectrum, their leaves would be a non-reflective
00:06:36.560
black instead of green, and we would probably be mavrophiles instead of chlorophylls.
00:06:43.920
So yes, maybe what we love in plants has a direct connection to the sun and the entropic
00:06:51.120
processes deep within its core that fuse hydrogen into helium, letting tiny amounts of energy
00:06:58.400
escape in the form of sunlight. There's another kind of love I would like to put into play here.
00:07:05.520
I'll refer to it as amor Mundi or Love of the World. That phrase is found in St. Augustine
00:07:14.960
who urged Love of God over Love of the World, and it was first put into modern circulation
00:07:22.160
by one of the trustees of this radio program. I mean our friend Hannah Addent.
00:07:27.280
Amor Mundi. Mundus is the world we share in common with our fellow citizens.
00:07:35.520
It's the world we step into when we leave our homes and enter the town square.
00:07:41.200
It's the world we fret about when we read a newspaper or hear about what's happening in our community.
00:07:49.440
A world brings people together through its social, cultural, and political institutions,
00:07:55.280
we love it in a fundamentally different manner than we love people, plants, pets, or our pocketbooks.
00:08:04.000
We love it for the way its structures, our collective lives, and connects us to past and future generations.
00:08:13.520
Amundus is built by humans, for humans, so that we may have a place to live in, to learn in, to act in,
00:08:22.880
to die in, and to be remembered. Without a world to house us, we are not fully human.
00:08:31.200
I'll have more to say about Amor Mundi in a moment, but first let me mention another kind of love
00:08:38.640
that does not have a proper name in English. I will call it "lamplite love".
00:08:43.840
I borrow the image of lamplite from a poem of WB Yates called "Leaders of the Crowd"
00:08:51.280
where Yates declares truth flourishes where the students lamp has shown and they're alone.
00:09:00.400
Truth flourishes where the students lamp has shown and they're alone.
00:09:06.400
"The student's lamp is not a computer screen that shines into the reader's eyes.
00:09:13.280
It's the subtle light of mental concentration which the student brings to the written word on the
00:09:20.000
page, illuminating the truth that hides in the silent converse between reader and book."
00:09:26.720
The American poet Wallace Stevens evokes the effects of that mental glow
00:09:33.520
in a poem of his that I've cited before here on entitled opinions,
00:09:37.120
at poem begins, "The house was quiet and the world was calm. The reader became the book
00:09:46.400
and summer night was like the conscious being of the book."
00:09:49.600
This kind of studio's reading, where the reader becomes the conscious being of the book
00:09:58.160
is the essence of lamplite love. And here's something to consider, to study,
00:10:05.360
originally meant to desire, to strive toward, to show zealful.
00:10:11.280
It derives from the Latin studio with its archaic connotations of order,
00:10:18.160
keenness and eagerness. Our friend Dante knew what it meant to study in this keen,
00:10:24.640
Amorous Manor. In the last chapter of his Vithanwova, a short book he wrote about his love
00:10:32.400
for a young woman named Beatrice, composed a year after Beatrice died at the age of 24.
00:10:38.240
Dante was the same age, more or less. In that Vithanwova, Dante tells his reader that he has decided
00:10:46.160
to stop writing until I quote him, "I may speak of Beatrice in a more worthy manner
00:10:52.320
and say of her what has not been said of any woman."
00:10:55.680
He adds that in the meantime, he has decided to study as much as I can.
00:11:02.960
He will stewed your quantipos.
00:11:06.080
Desire, study and love come together in that visionary last chapter of the Vithanwova.
00:11:13.840
I say visionary because in the divine comedy, which he began writing 10 years later,
00:11:20.480
Dante will meet Beatrice at the top of Mount Purgatory, and she or her character will actually guide
00:11:27.760
him through the nine spheres of heaven into the Imperium, where he'll have a face-to-face
00:11:33.440
vision of God. Dante's celestial journey in Paredizo is in many ways a journey of the mind,
00:11:41.600
of what he called La Mente en Amorana, the mind and love.
00:11:48.000
The enamored mind takes the student's lamp up to the stars, where it seeks to consider the cosmic
00:11:54.640
order to which all things, including its own fervent desire for knowledge, be long.
00:12:00.240
The enamored mind is in love with the divine mind that created space, time, matter, spirit,
00:12:09.600
and the whole cosmic spectacle above our heads with its great crystalline spheres embedded
00:12:16.080
one within the other, all nine of which in Dante's medieval cosmology, turned in perfect intersecting
00:12:24.560
circles around the Godhead. Since the universe is the visible manifestation of the mind that
00:12:31.840
engendered it, one has only to open one's eyes and consider the stars to become enamored with it.
00:12:38.560
In the famous last line of the divine comedy, Dante refers to the love that moves the sun and the
00:12:45.920
other stars, enamored the love that binds creation to creator, creator to creation,
00:12:52.640
and the student's mind to the divine mind. Thus we can introduce one more term here,
00:12:59.680
Cosmophilia. Cosmophilia in our time takes a different form than it did in Dante's.
00:13:07.840
We love the universe not for its harmonies, but for its wild,
00:13:13.360
wayward, overwhelming energies, its bottomless chaos, and nuclear rage. We love it as a sublime monster.
00:13:22.720
What has changed? Only the way we understand it. With our physical eyes, we see the same night sky
00:13:32.240
as Dante did, yet our vision of it is completely different, because human vision is not the same thing
00:13:39.760
as animal eyesight. That's a proposition that comes to you from yours truly,
00:13:45.920
and if you need a reference to it, or to the term chlorophilia, I refer you to my book Gardens
00:13:52.800
and essay on the human condition published in 2008.
00:13:56.160
So human vision is not the same thing as animal eyesight. Why? Because vision is cognitive,
00:14:04.480
synthetic, and historical, in addition to being ocular and organic.
00:14:10.080
When Dante joins us to open our eyes to see the glory of the heavenly constellations,
00:14:17.040
he meant above all our mental eyes, through which the order of the cosmos becomes apparent to
00:14:24.560
the informed, knowledgeable viewer. The circular motion of the heavens was visible only to a
00:14:32.000
mind that understood its geocentric mechanics. What this tells us, and here is another proposition I offer
00:14:40.560
up to the brigade, what this tells us is that human vision sees with the pale,
00:14:46.640
extra-missive light of intelligence. We emit a light when we look,
00:14:52.160
the same light that shines in the student's lamp, or in the student's mind,
00:14:58.400
when he or she turns on that lamp. That's why we could say that lamp light love,
00:15:04.400
when it turns toward the night sky, in fact illuminates the stars and helps them shine.
00:15:11.760
I cannot stress enough here the cognitive aspect of human vision, or the degree to which
00:15:20.240
our historically evolving frameworks alter and reorganize our perception. Pre-determining what
00:15:27.440
we see, as well as what we don't see when we open our eyes. To say it again, vision is linked to
00:15:36.160
understanding, and understanding is linked to the age into which we're born. We no longer belong to
00:15:44.720
the age of gods, hence we no longer see Zeus in the lightning, or Dionysus in the vine, or
00:15:52.240
an nipius in the river, or nymphs in our ponds. Today we see biomass, not Artemis in the earth's woodlands,
00:16:02.400
and Poseidon for us is H2O with 35 parts per thousand of sodium chloride.
00:16:09.040
In some, our historical worlds are the lens through which the phenomenon appears.
00:16:17.440
And what this means is that all the types of love I've discussed so far. Biophilia, chlorophilia,
00:16:25.600
bibliophilia, and cosmophilia have amormundia or world love as their foundation and center of gravity.
00:16:34.800
How so?
00:16:36.720
Without a world to house us, a person is what King Lear called unaccommodated man,
00:16:45.920
a poor bear-forked animal. Without a world to live in, we could not love the plant life around us,
00:16:54.320
since chlorophilia needs a human place to take root and flourishing. Without a world to draw away from,
00:17:02.160
we could not withdraw into the intimacy of a book in lamplight. Our books, after all,
00:17:10.080
our edited, published, distributed to bookstores, housed in libraries, and handed down from generation
00:17:18.800
to generation. All books presuppose a world. The same holds true for cosmophilia. Without a world,
00:17:28.080
we cannot relate to the larger universe within which our history unfolds in time.
00:17:35.840
I could phrase this thought differently and say, for a universe to exist, we have to have an idea of it
00:17:42.800
because there is no universe independent of its idea. Matter may exist independently of ideas,
00:17:51.120
but not the unified totality of all that is. That totality is first and foremost a human concept.
00:18:00.720
A human concept in turn requires a mind and the human mind in its turn requires a world to learn in
00:18:08.640
and to think in. And finally, our worlds require amor Mundi
00:18:15.680
because it is human love and human love alone that builds our worlds and assumes responsibility
00:18:24.480
for their perpetuation. Stay tuned friends, more about world love in a moment.
00:18:40.400
[Music]
00:19:03.680
We all practice world love in one form or another in our daily lives. It's why we vote,
00:19:09.680
why we follow the news, why we take up causes, and why we send children to school.
00:19:14.960
If you were to know with certainty that the human world was going to come to an end the day you died,
00:19:21.520
the rest of your life would become meaningless. The ultimate bastion of meaning is the endurance
00:19:29.200
of the world after our death. Only a bare, forked animal can survive the termination of the world.
00:19:37.680
Philosophers have thought and theorized about the world.
00:19:40.880
Shopenhauer's main work is called the world as will and representation.
00:19:46.160
Martin Heidegger speaks about the worldhood of the world.
00:19:50.560
Wittgenstein begins his tractatus with the proposition that the world is all that is the case.
00:19:57.360
Yet when it comes to love of the world, which keeps worlds and being, there is hardly a philosopher
00:20:05.120
or thinker we can turn to for insight. Apart from Hannah Adent, who put the term "amor moondian"
00:20:12.000
desurculation, the only thinker known to me who offers a minimal philosophy of world love is
00:20:19.920
Jumbatista Vico, the 18th century Neapolitan thinker, and author of the new science.
00:20:26.640
By the way, keep an eye out for an entitled opinions show on Vico. I'm hoping we can bring you one
00:20:33.360
soon. I can't believe I've never done a show on Vico over these past many years since he's the thinker
00:20:40.240
who has had the biggest impact on my own work. But maybe that's why I haven't done a show on him
00:20:45.600
yet because he's too important to me. In any case, there is one passage and only one passage in
00:20:52.800
Vico's new science that is directly pertinent to Amor moondian, yet it's a golden one.
00:21:01.360
It's a passage in which Vico describes the way love and world co-evolve as human societies move
00:21:08.800
in stages from savagery to enlightened. In section 341, Vico, using the Italian verb "amare" writes,
00:21:18.880
"Man in the bestial state loves his own welfare, having taken wife and begotten children,
00:21:28.000
he loves his own welfare, along with that of his family, having entered upon civil life,
00:21:34.560
he loves his own welfare along with that of his city." When its rule is extended over several
00:21:40.720
peoples, he loves his own welfare along with that of the nation. When the nations are united by
00:21:47.360
wars, treaties of peace, alliances, and commerce, he loves his own welfare along with that of the
00:21:53.840
entire human race. In all these circumstances, man loves principally his own utility.
00:22:01.360
We find here that self-love becomes Amor moondian without ever surrendering its self-directed utility,
00:22:11.040
self-directed impulse. In Vico's scheme, love of the world actually arises only after self-love
00:22:19.920
extends its circle beyond family to include members of a polity, that is to say in the third,
00:22:27.840
fourth, and fifth stages described by Vico, namely city, nation, and empire.
00:22:34.960
Love is a binding power and world's come into being when an individual or a family's interest
00:22:43.840
combined with other individuals and families' interests to create institutional forms of togetherness
00:22:50.800
out of self-centredness. This process of expansion extends the egoic core of love from the private
00:22:59.520
into the public realm. In so doing, it gives rise to the sentiment of a shared world,
00:23:06.960
a common world. Cities and nations become possible only when self-love sublates into a commitment
00:23:14.960
to the common good. Without such sublation, there would be no world love, and without world love,
00:23:22.880
there would be no world at all. People would not die for their country or city state if the roots
00:23:30.240
of Amor Mundi do not run deep in human communities. Yet history reminds us time and again
00:23:36.880
that Amor Mundi can collapse back into private or tribal self-love at any moment along the way.
00:23:43.760
The great insight of the Vico passage I cited is that the larger the spheres of inclusion
00:23:51.040
get the more diffuse becomes the love that holds them together. Thus the bonds of tribe tend to
00:23:58.000
be stronger than those of city while civic bonds tend to be stronger than those of nation.
00:24:03.040
The good news is that as societies become more complex and law-governed,
00:24:08.480
institutions do most of the binding work that love had done previously.
00:24:14.000
Empires do not depend on love as much as principalities and city states do.
00:24:21.920
Yet we must never assume that any polity, however institutionally sound or organize,
00:24:28.080
can do without a considerable quotient of Amor Mundi on the part of its citizens.
00:24:33.600
To love the human race as a whole is a tall order, yet any cosmopolitan or international
00:24:42.320
world order depends upon a majority of its citizens committing themselves to that ideal,
00:24:49.680
to that form of expansive, Catholic love of the human. In fact,
00:24:55.040
the major question facing us today is whether love of the human world as a whole.
00:25:00.640
In all this diverse social, cultural, and political instantiations can possibly hold its own
00:25:08.400
against the reactive counter pressures of nation love, not to mention the more adivistic forms of
00:25:15.200
tribal. Another major question facing us today is whether it's possible to love a world that,
00:25:22.560
despite itself, is destroying the earth we dwell on.
00:25:26.320
The destructive forces of our contemporary global world, with all their technopolitical
00:25:33.840
machinery and will to power, these forces are threatening our future survival,
00:25:41.200
as biological as well as worldly beings, which means that they are thoroughly at odds with the
00:25:48.880
inner core of self-love from which all world love springs.
00:25:52.480
It's this disjunction, this out of jointness between self-love and Amor Mundi that threatens to
00:26:02.880
transform world love into a form of world-loathing.
00:26:10.080
There is a great deal of world-loathing in the world today and often for good reason,
00:26:14.800
yet nothing is more dangerous than to give into it.
00:26:19.280
World-loathing only hastens the unworlding of the world that creates such revulsion in us these days.
00:26:28.000
I suspect that the main unabout impulse behind a lot of environmental activism these days
00:26:37.200
is not only to save the planet, but to save the world that is threatening the planet.
00:26:42.240
In other words, to save the world from itself so that we might be able to love it once again.
00:26:49.280
So I will leave you with one more proposition.
00:26:53.200
Only Amor Mundi has the power to render the world we live in today worthy of love again.
00:27:02.400
If we withdraw our love from the world, the world is lost and with it the only home we have here on earth.
00:27:10.000
One need not love the people of the world. One need not love the world's laws or reality.
00:27:18.240
One need not love the direction the world is heading. Yet you must still love the world itself
00:27:25.280
if only because it's your world and it needs you now or the never.
00:27:32.000
So much depends upon a red wheelbarrow, said William Carlos Williams.
00:27:37.760
Yet a lot more depends upon our resolve to keep the world in being,
00:27:42.640
to resist the temptation to load it and to find a way to regenerate the saving power of Amor Mundi.
00:27:50.880
I'm Robert Harrison for Entitled Opinions. Thanks for listening.
00:27:56.080
[Music]
00:28:06.080
[Music]
00:28:16.080
[Music]
00:28:26.080
[Music]
00:28:36.080
[Music]
00:28:46.080
[Music]
00:28:56.080
[Music]